|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,462
|
I realized that I THOUGHT I understood it all, but apparently I don't.
Can some explain the various terms to me: spring-assisted, cone lock, swivel, etc...? Swivel I'm pretty sure I get (as opposed to glide bar). What is cone lock? If your base clamps are cone lock does that imply they are NOT spring assisted? I emailed Mutual Power asking if my machine could be upgraded to spring-assisted base clamps, and the reply was that they ARE spring assisted. Maybe I am a complete idiot and using them wrong (entirely possible!) The MP web site says: // I get this part Adjustable width linear ball bearing string gripper. // I get this part 2 diamond-coated spring assisted aluminum alloy thumb-adjustable swivel tennis clamps. // I don't get this part Easy operate cone lock swivel clamping system with durable carbon-steel handle. I thought that if it was cone lock, it was NOT spring assisted? My understanding is screwed up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,881
|
cone lock clamps: (look at base of clamp) theyre harder to use than spring assisted.
http://www.eagnas.com/flex840.html spring assisted: (look at base) almost no torque at all needed to lock it into base. http://www.eagnas.com/com910.html basicaly cone lock is sticks sticking out lol while spring looks different. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,881
|
yep cone lock means not spring assisted lol. And spring assisted are the best. I wouldnt buy a machine without one due to some people complaining about cone lock and wanting to upgrade which will cost 200$ id rather spend a bit more and get it all in one bundle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
Interestingly, I don't know why I want to try spring assisted, except to maybe "find out what I'm missing," b/c to be honest, the cone lock hold well and actually require very little force. Maybe it's all in my head. Actually, if anything I would say I'd almost prefer self-centering mounts over the spring assisted base clamps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,881
|
lol i wouldnt if you don't do a high volume of tennis rackets why would you want self centering mounts? I'd rather make something that last around half an hr more enjoyable than something that only lasts a minute or less. I mount my racket on a gamma progresion 602 in less than a minute. So why does it matter? spring assisted clamps to go!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,881
|
all this talk bout stringing makes me want to go string right now
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
But getting the racquet centered properly (which I am anal about) is a little annoying. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Laker Land
Posts: 3,638
|
The Eagnas and MP Cone locks are the same thing. It's a screw/bolt with a repositionable lever. Even the later model are just bolts without the ability to reposition.
You do want the Switch action or lever action base clamps over the Cone Lock. Don't ask me why they call it a Cone Lock, but it's a bolt with T-nut. As for spring asisted, there is a spring in the repositionable levers, but it just pushed the lever down to lock in to the bolt. You pull it to reposition.
__________________
Machines: Gamma 6004 2-point w/ Wise 2086 & Babolat Sensor Dual |
|
|
|
| Lakers4Life |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Lakers4Life |
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,881
|
it takes like a minute why do u care if you don't do high volumes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
Switch action doesn't use a bolt with T-nut? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,462
|
I can't really pinpoint why, but I'm feeling some buyer's remorse with the MP Titan 7700.
I don't know why, b/c I can't really find anything wrong with it. The cost wasn't bad and the machine seems to be exactly as advertised. It's almost like I'm just now realizing that I want features I didn't know I wanted. I didn't think I cared about SC mounts or spring-action base clamps or 3-tooth clamps. But I was coming from an SP Swing (drop weight with flying clamps), so I didn't really KNOW that those features were indeed important to me. It's unfortunate, b/c I stand firm that the Titan 7700 is a fine decision for anyone who want a machine with ITS features. It's just that I'm realizing (after the fact) that I actually wanted DIFFERENT features. It's not a knock against the machine; it's me not realizing what I really wanted. I feel stuck now. I shouldn't though -- it's still much more pleasant to string on than my SP Swing was. What to do... what to do... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,881
|
How much did you get the machine for? Then again you would have to pay way more for the features you wanted. Self centering mounts if generally found in machines over $1000 for those who are really looking at stringing high volumes of rackets. I still didnt buy my machine but i am considering the Revo 4k. The only thing it doesnt have that you were talking about is the self centering mounts. But why would i want to pay double the machine for self centering mounts when i won't be stringing a lot of rackets. It's a quite minute set up and not worth it. Revo 4k comes in 3 tooth, spring assisted and is a very rough machine :P That's why ive been reseaching so much so that i purchase a machine that i don't regret. Then again, think about the price you'd have to pay for self centering mounts, adn if the cone lock is not a big deal, then don't worry about it. For those comlpainging it is a big deal :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
That's a feature I didn't want to compromise on. I paid $670 for the machine (which included shipping). I ruled out Eagnas just based on feedback on these forums, but I'm second guessing that a little bit, honestly. Looks like that Combo 910 has just about everything I wanted (maybe it doesn't have SC mounts), but it's upright, with spring-assisted base clamps, and even has a disc break (the MP is a screw break, but does seem to hold perfectly well, even for O3 racquets). But the Eagnas is cheaper.... perhaps I should not have ruled that particular model out just b/c it was Eagnas, since it seems to get mostly positive reviews. Ah well, what can I do... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,881
|
You'd feel remorse for basically any stringing machine thats not the babolat star 5 or a stringing machine thats $1000+ if it really matters then raise your budget. Why does it have to be an upright? Revo is perfect in my opininon. Has everything you want except non SC mounts but still mounting should not take more than a minute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Laker Land
Posts: 3,638
|
Quote:
![]() or this: ![]() Cone locks are like this: ![]() Switch action sort uses a T-Nut to hold hold it down, but it's preset.
__________________
Machines: Gamma 6004 2-point w/ Wise 2086 & Babolat Sensor Dual |
|
|
|
|
| Lakers4Life |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Lakers4Life |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,881
|
table lol???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,462
|
It's just personal preference and what I find to be convenient.
The same way you can't live without spring assisted clamps. While that's a nice-to-have in my mind, I'm more or less fine with my cone lock clamps. The lack of SC mounting annoys me more, but it sounds like it doesn't bother you. We're just different in what criteria is important to us, which is fine -- to each his own. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,133
|
imo, stand mount is the only way to go when stringing...
regarding your buyer's remorse...i've used both the cone lock & spring loaded base clamps...spring loaded is a little more convenient and saves a few secs/pull, but i would be fine w/ either honestly. at least you have fixed clamps. if you had flying clamps, you'd have serious buyer's remorse. your MP Titan is a fine machine & will serve you well for many, many years...my suggestion is just use if for a few years then sell it & upgrade to something better. u can practice perfecting your technique & consistency on a "inferior" machine. when you upgrade to a high end model, your string jobs will just be better. happy stringing. Last edited by mad dog1 : 04-24-2010 at 04:24 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|