• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > General Pro Player Discussion
Reload this Page Can Nadal complete 16 slams or more?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: What it be folks
It could very well happen, time will tell 92 54.76%
Ain't going to happen, every year I claim his career is over 76 45.24%
Voters: 168. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Page 1 of 18 1 2311 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2010, 09:30 AM   #1
jackson vile
Legend
 
jackson vile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,560
Default Can Nadal complete 16 slams or more?

If Nadal wins on sunday, he will be setting a very strong trend suggeting that he very well may be able to lock down at least 2 slams a year.

Nadal would only need to win 2 slams a year for 4 years to match Roger.

We have to consider that ;
1) Every time people say it is over for Rafa, he comes back better and badder.
2) Nadal still has room for improvement, very scary thought, and continues to do so
3) Consider Aggasi who played many years with severly F'ed up back, I believe that Nadal will play until he dies and that is the only force that can stop him
4) Nadal could skip all hard court games and play for a very long time on the natural surfaces where he dominates
__________________
GOAT = Novak > Fedal
jackson vile is offline   Reply With Quote
jackson vile
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jackson vile
Old 07-03-2010, 09:33 AM   #2
muzza123
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackson vile View Post
Nadal would only need to win 2 slams a year for 4 years to match Roger.
Doesn't sound like an "only" job, however you wish to word it!
muzza123 is offline   Reply With Quote
muzza123
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by muzza123
Old 07-03-2010, 09:35 AM   #3
Rippy
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: England
Posts: 3,640
Default

Those poll options are rather silly, aren't they? Should just be "yes" and "no".

The second poll option lumps people who just don't believe he'll be able to do it with those who claim his career is over every year, so will result in less people choosing it if they don't agree with both the statements it makes.
Rippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Rippy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Rippy
Old 07-03-2010, 09:42 AM   #4
jackson vile
Legend
 
jackson vile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rippy View Post
Those poll options are rather silly, aren't they? Should just be "yes" and "no".

The second poll option lumps people who just don't believe he'll be able to do it with those who claim his career is over every year, so will result in less people choosing it if they don't agree with both the statements it makes.
Neither one is absolute, listen; things aren't absolute and this poll is well... rather polarizing.
__________________
GOAT = Novak > Fedal
jackson vile is offline   Reply With Quote
jackson vile
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jackson vile
Old 07-03-2010, 09:49 AM   #5
meg0529
Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 5,199
Default

I really wish there were more options here. 16 or more, he'd have to be really luck to win, like all other players drop dead lucky. If Wimby and US happen this year :: fingers crossed:: then 11-12 are totally viable. With Rafa it's difficult to tell!
meg0529 is offline   Reply With Quote
meg0529
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by meg0529
Old 07-03-2010, 09:50 AM   #6
muzza123
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackson vile View Post
Nadal would only need to win 2 slams a year for 4 years to match Roger.
Furthermore, last I checked Roger is still active on the Tour, so whilst Nadal may continue to acquire Majors, so might Rodge.

Less of these type of threads please!
muzza123 is offline   Reply With Quote
muzza123
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by muzza123
Old 07-03-2010, 09:51 AM   #7
kanamit
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,872
Default

Can we stop overhyping Nadal please? He'll retire the greatest clay courter ever, but he'll never even win a US open. He'll be one of the greats, no doubt, but break the grand slam record? Give me a break. It will require him to match his peak year for years and years more, when now he's having knee issues earlier despite having to play fewer and fewer tournaments.
kanamit is offline   Reply With Quote
kanamit
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kanamit
Old 07-03-2010, 09:53 AM   #8
jones101
Hall Of Fame
 
jones101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 3,794
Default

I think 12 is deinitely viable, 16 is a LONG way off, but woth Rafa, like Fed, anything is possible.
jones101 is offline   Reply With Quote
jones101
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jones101
Old 07-03-2010, 09:53 AM   #9
muzza123
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kanamit View Post
Can we stop overhyping Nadal please? He'll retire the greatest clay courter ever, but he'll never even win a US open. He'll be one of the greats, no doubt, but break the grand slam record? Give me a break. It will require him to match his peak year for years and years more, when now he's having knee issues earlier despite having to play fewer and fewer tournaments.
Well summarised.

And Roger hasn't retired yet FFS!!!
muzza123 is offline   Reply With Quote
muzza123
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by muzza123
Old 07-03-2010, 09:57 AM   #10
cucio
Legend
 
cucio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tonginchik
Posts: 6,426
Default

The real question is, can Gulbis?
__________________
Fan of the fans.
cucio is offline   Reply With Quote
cucio
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by cucio
Old 07-03-2010, 10:04 AM   #11
samboy01
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 503
Default

Federer is done.

Nadal will be in double digits very soon. After that, the sky is the limit!

I see him ending with:

3 AO
8 FO
4 WB
1 UO

That's 16 slams. Add the fact that he would have more master series than Federer, the gold medal AND a convincing head-to-head against him especially in grandslam finals. And there you have it: Nadal is GOAT

Federer fans, I know that Nadal is younger, fiercer and making a move, please don't stab him
samboy01 is offline   Reply With Quote
samboy01
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by samboy01
Old 07-03-2010, 10:07 AM   #12
Rippy
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: England
Posts: 3,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackson vile View Post
Neither one is absolute, listen; things aren't absolute and this poll is well... rather polarizing.
It still seems fairly silly to me to have a poll option that, in order to agree with it, you have to claim Nadal's career is over every year. That's obviously going to cause less people to choose that option.
Rippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Rippy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Rippy
Old 07-03-2010, 10:11 AM   #13
Berundi
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 521
Default

Who won the gold medal at the 1980 and 1984 Olympics?
Berundi is offline   Reply With Quote
Berundi
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Berundi
Old 07-03-2010, 10:23 AM   #14
miyagi
Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
Default

Poll options are immature, Nadal is my favourite player but I don't think he can get to 16 and even if he does I doubt Faderer will be retiring on 16.

I would happy with anything over 10 and extastic at any over 12!
miyagi is offline   Reply With Quote
miyagi
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by miyagi
Old 07-03-2010, 10:40 AM   #15
akv89
Hall Of Fame
 
akv89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackson vile View Post
If Nadal wins on sunday, he will be setting a very strong trend suggeting that he very well may be able to lock down at least 2 slams a year.

Nadal would only need to win 2 slams a year for 4 years to match Roger.

We have to consider that ;
1) Every time people say it is over for Rafa, he comes back better and badder.
2) Nadal still has room for improvement, very scary thought, and continues to do so
3) Consider Aggasi who played many years with severly F'ed up back, I believe that Nadal will play until he dies and that is the only force that can stop him
4) Nadal could skip all hard court games and play for a very long time on the natural surfaces where he dominates
And every time people say Rafa is back and better than ever, he gets injured/exhausted/loses form etc. Can we please put an end to this cycle?
akv89 is offline   Reply With Quote
akv89
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by akv89
Old 07-03-2010, 10:57 AM   #16
pvaudio
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,467
Default

The poll options are so asinine. Nadal will not get close to doubling his slam total. His body simply will not work long enough.
pvaudio is offline   Reply With Quote
pvaudio
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pvaudio
Old 07-03-2010, 10:58 AM   #17
meg0529
Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 5,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akv89 View Post
And every time people say Rafa is back and better than ever, he gets injured/exhausted/loses form etc. Can we please put an end to this cycle?
Amen to that!
meg0529 is offline   Reply With Quote
meg0529
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by meg0529
Old 07-03-2010, 11:03 AM   #18
JustBob
Professional
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,462
Default

When Federer was setting a strong trend, people were predicting 20-22 slams. Considering that Nadal is prone to injury and that the competition is getting tougher, I believe that 12 is a realistic number.
JustBob is offline   Reply With Quote
JustBob
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JustBob
Old 07-03-2010, 11:05 AM   #19
fundrazer
Professional
 
fundrazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,388
Default

^^Yeah akv89 makes a good point. We don't know if Nadal is going to have any more injuries. It's not like his knees will magically remain healthy for the rest of his career.

Another thing, some people used to think Roger would get 20+ slams. Then 2008 happened and some thought he wouldn't win another slam. From USO 08 to now he has picked up 4 slams. Nobody knows for sure whats going to happen in the future. There might be a new wunderkind to challenge the top 10, maybe even Donald Young could enter the goat discussion...lol
fundrazer is offline   Reply With Quote
fundrazer
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by fundrazer
Old 07-03-2010, 11:07 AM   #20
drakulie
Talk Tennis Guru
 
drakulie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: FT. Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 23,906
Default

If nadal was healthy, he would already have won more than 20 slams. So yes, once he gets healthy, he will never lose again...... even after he dies.
__________________
Head Stringer @ the LTC, Babolat Star 4 Stringer
http://www.youtube.com/user/drakulie
drakulie is offline   Reply With Quote
drakulie
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by drakulie
Reply
Page 1 of 18 1 2311 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > General Pro Player Discussion
Reload this Page Can Nadal complete 16 slams or more?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse