Poor Murray,got destroyed once more,LOL! - Page 2

Mun · 08-01-2010, 04:36 PM

This is a good thread. It's nice to see someone else having the balls to start threads like this telling the truth like it is.
I've been reading the same stuff about Murray for 2 years- he is young, he will get better, versatility, blablabla...- he is overrated, period.
Murray playing agressive tennis yet again LOL! The brit pusher has not changed, he thinks he's doing fine, ok...23 y.o. and no majors yet, 1 year without a title that matters and now choking against a top 20 player. at least i hope he keeps beating Fed in masters series.

Head Youtek · 08-01-2010, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckethead

Maybe you didn't see how many great shots and bold shot Sam was hitting and Murray was just chasing balls and getting points with Sam's UE.If Murray had 3 winners of his forehand was much.Querrey hit winners after winners,which is better than to be defending and winning on people's mistakes.The result doesn't show how the match was played.

Mabey you didnt see how many unforced errors sam had though still like sam but was rooting for murray.

aldeayeah · 08-01-2010, 05:32 PM

Murray played OK for the first two sets, and he almost won.

Just a note: the game in which Murray was broken in the third, Sam hit no winners. It was all UEs from Murray - 2 easy volleys and 2 forehands in a neutral rally.

Think about that before rewriting history.

RyanRF · 08-01-2010, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bablu

I would hardly call it destroyed , especially when he was down matchpoint. He did play really well though and I was quite impressed.

Just another one of those instances when Murray wasn't aggressive enough, that 3rd set was quite passive from him.

I was there live today, and I basically saw the same thing.

In the first set and a half, Murray's defensive play worked well and Sam donated a lot of points. However, as soon as Sam started to pick things up in the second set, Murray did not change his level of intensity at all.

HunterST · 08-01-2010, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kimosabi

Shouldn't this be in the spoilers section? I had work all day and am currently watching it taped on my DVR and then log in to the forum and immediately see "Murray got destroyed" right on the main page. WTF.

No kidding. Luckily I watched the match live, but the thread is pretty inconsiderate. Maybe if the point of the thread had some substance and wasn't solely for someone to gloat it would be different.

08-01-2010, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckethead

you guys just don't get it.
If a player is hitting all the winners and making you run and almost die on the court,for me this is destroying weather the result is close or not.
I am done with this argument.
Long live the pushers,LOL.

Using your logic, Mahut "destroyed" Isner at Wimby...

Tennis_Monk · 08-01-2010, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kimosabi

Shouldn't this be in the spoilers section? I had work all day and am currently watching it taped on my DVR and then log in to the forum and immediately see "Murray got destroyed" right on the main page. WTF.

Not really. Do you seriously expect to not to know results and yet post in this forum.

LOL

It happens all the time and it cant be policed and enforced. For every thread that is deleted, dozen others come up.

Btw, how long should people wait? may be poster should wait Till you (not exactly you but someone like you) go home, have a dinner, stroll the park, may be play a set or two, couple of beers and the finally till you finish watching the DVR' match in two-7 days?

If you wanted to not know the results, you know what to do. stay off internet news sites, media , forums until you are ready.

Feña14 · 08-01-2010, 05:55 PM

Murray has been strange all week, one moment he was playing great whilst the next he could hardly win a point.

Congratulations to Sam, but i'd still back Murray to take him in New York if they play.

Limpinhitter · 08-01-2010, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckethead

Does anybody want more proof that Murray will never win a GS??
Her has no weapons whatsoever.Querrey made him run from one side to the other like a dog in training.At the end of the match He was very tired and what running like a crazy headless chicken did for him?
A few extra points,but not a match.
There are only more and more players beating him and people still say that he has chance to win multiple majors with that serve ,forehand and volley skills.
I don;t think it is possible to chance Murray's 15 y.o forehand anymore.
The pusher got what He deserved.Querrey hit through him,hit him off the court.

It was one match. Querrey played over his head and Murray had an off day. So what?

Spider · 08-01-2010, 07:51 PM

LOL Murray got destroyed when he had a match point in this match, a match he didn't even try to win? Talk about "destroying" someone. He was hardly trying to win it. When they plan at a slam, we say how badly Murray destroyed Querrey.

fundrazer · 08-01-2010, 08:01 PM

zzz buckethead's silly troll posts aren't funny or interesting. Nobody was destroyed here, both played a good competitive match and it just so happened that Sam was better today. Although it's a recurring story in Murray's career, he runs into more aggressive players and can't find a way to win.

JohnnyCracker · 08-01-2010, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kimosabi

Shouldn't this be in the spoilers section? I had work all day and am currently watching it taped on my DVR and then log in to the forum and immediately see "Murray got destroyed" right on the main page. WTF.

Hello, genius! This IS the spoiler section. You are in the Pro Match RESULTS and Discussion section.

norbac · 08-01-2010, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyCracker

Hello, genius! This IS the spoiler section. You are in the Pro Match RESULTS and Discussion section.

The thread was originally posted in General Players Discussion.....

Virginia · 08-01-2010, 10:24 PM

I agree with the sentiments, irrespective of this match's results. Murray does not have the mental wherewithal to win a slam.

THUNDERVOLLEY · 08-02-2010, 01:33 AM

"Had," and the "coulda, woulda" arguments do not matter. Murray lost and could not think his way aound/turn up his game to defeat Sam--one of the points of this thread.

Rippy · 08-02-2010, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THUNDERVOLLEY

"Had," and the "coulda, woulda" arguments do not matter. Murray lost and could not think his way aound/turn up his game to defeat Sam--one of the points of this thread.

Nobody is disputing Murray lost; of course he did. People are disputing he was "destroyed" which is in the thread title.

Fedex · 08-02-2010, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckethead

So what are the excuses for Murray losing the match then??LOL

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mun

This is a good thread. It's nice to see someone else having the balls to start threads like this telling the truth like it is.
I've been reading the same stuff about Murray for 2 years- he is young, he will get better, versatility, blablabla...- he is overrated, period.
Murray playing agressive tennis yet again LOL! The brit pusher has not changed, he thinks he's doing fine, ok...23 y.o. and no majors yet, 1 year without a title that matters and now choking against a top 20 player. at least i hope he keeps beating Fed in masters series.

Buckethead. What excuses are you talking about?
I've been saying in the match thread Murray is really struggling.
Read before you make ignorant comments.
Mun. Where are you from and how old are you?
Does your mummy know you are wasting time writing crap on forums instead of doing your homework?
You are a complete moron if you think cheap gloating is a good thread.
Email me if you think you and Buckethead have balls, that's if they've even dropped yet.

rovex · 08-02-2010, 02:35 AM

Sam blew Murray off the court in the third set, but saying that i thought Murray performance dipped as well

Fedex · 08-02-2010, 02:39 AM

Buckethead. I tried emailing you there to let you know what personality disorder you have but you've blocked people sending emails.
As Mun says you have some balls.

callmethedoctor · 08-02-2010, 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spider

LOL Murray got destroyed when he had a match point in this match, a match he didn't even try to win? Talk about "destroying" someone. He was hardly trying to win it. When they plan at a slam, we say how badly Murray destroyed Querrey.

Oh, yeah, he wasn't trying to win the title, he didn't care. That's why he was screaming, breaking his racket, and cutting himself, "LOL."

08-01-2010, 07:51 PM	#30
Spider Hall Of Fame Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK Posts: 2,251	LOL Murray got destroyed when he had a match point in this match, a match he didn't even try to win? Talk about "destroying" someone. He was hardly trying to win it. When they plan at a slam, we say how badly Murray destroyed Querrey. __________________ Andy Murray

08-01-2010, 10:24 PM	#34
Virginia Professional Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Auckland, New Zealand Posts: 1,469	I agree with the sentiments, irrespective of this match's results. Murray does not have the mental wherewithal to win a slam. __________________ See my racquet collection at www.80s-tennis.com/pages/virginia-crawford.html and my addition to the Borg collection of the now rare Donnay Diamant.

08-02-2010, 02:39 AM	#39
Fedex Hall Of Fame Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Dundee Posts: 4,127	Buckethead. I tried emailing you there to let you know what personality disorder you have but you've blocked people sending emails. As Mun says you have some balls. Last edited by Fedex : 08-02-2010 at 02:41 AM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode