• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Pros' Racquets and Gear
Reload this Page sharapova's racquet in RG2010
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-01-2010, 04:26 AM   #21
vsbabolat
Legend
 
vsbabolat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,390
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themitchmann View Post
Prince didn't mess up her arm...she did. In case you didn't notice, she swings as hard as she can at every single ball.

She's played with a stiff racquet her whole careeer...why would a stiff racquet bother her now?

I hope that her "testing" is truly just testing...
From a competitors website:
First, let us clearly state that shoulder injuries and possible causes are outside of our area of expertise. We have studied and possess a solid understanding of tennis elbow, but shoulder issues are a different animal.

With that duly noted, Maria Sharapova is currently attempting to comeback from serious shoulder surgery (rotator cuff). We have read reports that only now, AFTER the surgery, the Sharapova camp is examining her equipment. The results will not be surprising to those who read our blog entries and tweets.

A review of Maria’s racquet has found the the Prince O3 and Speedport frames Maria was using have some undesirable specifications from a health perspective. As a result, it has been reported that Maria has switched from her previous racquet to a different Prince racquet. The report indicates the weapon Sharapova now weilds is less stiff than her previous frame and is a standard 27″ in length. It is reported her previous racquet was 27 1/2″ in length.

We have whined long and hard about the high stiffness ratings of the frames Prince has been producing. From our perspective, the majority of Prince’s newer frames offer undesirable specs from an arm health perspective. We believe a healthy frame has a flex rating in the mid 60′s or lower, is a standard length (27″), weighs approx. 11oz or greater, and offers a head light balance. The flex rating is the only specification that can not be modified through customization and thus we believe is the first spec to consider when evaluating racquets.

Team Sharapova is wisely reportedly reviewing her string setup as well. Previously Maria was using the Babolat Hurricane as her main strings with a natural gut cross. The Hurricane is a stiff and unforgiving poly-based string, similar in that respect to the Luxilon ALU. Her stringer has moved her to Luxilon M2 mains with a natural gut cross. While we applaud the effort to review the equipment and make this change, we would suggest going with the natural gut in the mains and a newer generation soft poly-based string in the crosses for added control.

It is impossible to know the exact cause of Maria’s injury, but we do know that stiff strings and a stiff frame such as she was using do transmit extra shock to the body. Over time, it is the shock that causes the body to break down and promotes injuries.

Look at the photo above. Even the professionals do not strike the ball squarely on each hit. In the shot above, Maria is striking the ball in the upper 1/3 rd of the hitting area. Any shot not centered is going to create extra shock. It is only wise to examine your equipment, (frame and strings), to determine if it helps to absorb this shock or if it promotes the transfer of the shock to the body.

It is possible that the cumulative effect of shock contributed to or possibly caused Maria’s injury. It is wise of her team to now examine her equipment and switch her to a frame and string set up that will help prevent excessive shock from reaching her body.


It certainly looks to me that the HEAD racquet is helping Sharapova. She is serving much better again. Had a chance against Henin on clay, Maria's worst surface.
__________________
Babolat ruined VS Gut and Tonic Gut with BT7. Why change a gut string that had been perfect for 135 years? It's now overpriced garbage.

Last edited by vsbabolat : 06-01-2010 at 04:30 AM.
vsbabolat is offline   Reply With Quote
vsbabolat
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by vsbabolat
Old 06-01-2010, 04:23 PM   #22
themitchmann
Hall Of Fame
 
themitchmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,024
Default

^^Valid points stated in the blurb. I agree with the statement regarding the overall stiffness of the stringbed. I think shifting to a more arm friendly string/racquet combo should have happened a long time ago.

My major issue here is with all of the Prince haters that are blaming everything on the racquet...

And again, look at how she swings at the ball. She goes for broke on almost every shot. Any tension in the arm/grip will surely result in more problems when she's swinging that hard/fast.
__________________
Prince Rebel 95
PTR Certified Pro / USRSA Certified MRT
themitchmann is offline   Reply With Quote
themitchmann
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by themitchmann
Old 06-01-2010, 05:44 PM   #23
marosmith
Professional
 
marosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lafayette, Or
Posts: 967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themitchmann View Post
^^Valid points stated in the blurb. I agree with the statement regarding the overall stiffness of the stringbed. I think shifting to a more arm friendly string/racquet combo should have happened a long time ago.

My major issue here is with all of the Prince haters that are blaming everything on the racquet...

And again, look at how she swings at the ball. She goes for broke on almost every shot. Any tension in the arm/grip will surely result in more problems when she's swinging that hard/fast.
Her shoulder surgery makes her more suceptible to injuries. Medical science shows that injury issues with the joints will go from high to low- in other words if the shoulder breaks down, the next to go is the forearm, wrist, hand, fingers etc...

My guess is that the stiff frame and strings probably also caused injury to her shoulder.

I guess you could blame her injuries on her playing style, but if the racket doesn't suit her playing style why wouldn't she change rackets? Do you think it makes more sense for her to change her playing style??

If Prince is telling the truth on their tweet maybe this will lead them to make a real soft players racket instead of the junk they have been producing of late.

If not Head will get her and I almost gaurantee you her elbow issues will go away for good (unless she goes to full poly).

Also, her form, compared to almost all rec players, is very good. So to say that her form is bad is sort of like saying theirs is better then hers because they don't get shoulder injuries, or elbow injuries etc...

Well, that's not the case, she just plays more, and hits more, over a period of many years and the stiff frame is taking its toll.
__________________
3 Head PT57a 12.4 oz. 9 pts HL. 1HBH. Pair of PT167a for the wife.
marosmith is offline   Reply With Quote
marosmith
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by marosmith
Old 06-02-2010, 03:47 AM   #24
themitchmann
Hall Of Fame
 
themitchmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marosmith View Post
I guess you could blame her injuries on her playing style, but if the racket doesn't suit her playing style why wouldn't she change rackets? Do you think it makes more sense for her to change her playing style??

If Prince is telling the truth on their tweet maybe this will lead them to make a real soft players racket instead of the junk they have been producing of late.

If not Head will get her and I almost gaurantee you her elbow issues will go away for good (unless she goes to full poly).

Also, her form, compared to almost all rec players, is very good. So to say that her form is bad is sort of like saying theirs is better then hers because they don't get shoulder injuries, or elbow injuries etc...

Well, that's not the case, she just plays more, and hits more, over a period of many years and the stiff frame is taking its toll.
1.) My point is that she should have evaluated her equipment earlier on in the process. I said nothing about her changing her playing style.

2.) Again, your comment regarding Prince is what frustrates me about these boards at times. To call their frames "junk" is simply unreasonable. Many manufacturers have been successful with stiff racquets (though I would personally like to see some more frames with lower stiffness ratings in the Prince line-up).

3.) A switch in racquets will probably be beneficial, regardless of what brand she is using. If she changes Prince models or layups, she may not need to move to a different manufacturer.

4.) And I am only speculating regarding the stiffness of her racquet. Pro stock racquets are obviously not the same as what most of us will she from standard retailers.

5.) I did not criticize her form: I merely stated an observation. I don't think you can deny that she swings hard at almost every ball. My point is that if she carries any tension in her arm during the swing/contact, she will certain run the risk of more damage.

6.) Her form is significantly better than most rec players (many of whom do suffer from injuries do to poor form). To say that I inferred otherwise is false.

7.) I agree that he injuries may be a result of overuse/repeated use. That type of injury is incredibly prevalent in tennis (both pro and rec).
__________________
Prince Rebel 95
PTR Certified Pro / USRSA Certified MRT
themitchmann is offline   Reply With Quote
themitchmann
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by themitchmann
Old 06-02-2010, 03:49 AM   #25
bsandy
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,991
Send a message via MSN to bsandy Send a message via Yahoo to bsandy
Default

I thought this was simple . . .

The softer Radical Pro allows her to use softer strings and not be too powerful.

. . . Bud
__________________
My girlfriend told me if I bought another tennis racquet she'd leave me -- Darn I'm going to miss her.
bsandy is offline   Reply With Quote
bsandy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by bsandy
Old 06-02-2010, 04:21 AM   #26
themitchmann
Hall Of Fame
 
themitchmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bsandy View Post
I thought this was simple . . .

The softer Radical Pro allows her to use softer strings and not be too powerful
I think that's a part of it.
__________________
Prince Rebel 95
PTR Certified Pro / USRSA Certified MRT
themitchmann is offline   Reply With Quote
themitchmann
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by themitchmann
Old 08-12-2010, 03:47 PM   #27
RafaPan
New User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 36
Default

Is there any way we could merge these threads?
RafaPan is offline   Reply With Quote
RafaPan
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by RafaPan
Reply
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Pros' Racquets and Gear
Reload this Page sharapova's racquet in RG2010

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:51 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse