• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Pros' Racquets and Gear
Reload this Page Andy Roddick Frame :)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 4 of 4 « First < 23 4
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-02-2010, 05:17 PM   #61
BobFL
Hall Of Fame
 
BobFL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PONG View Post
Did you catch this from the match last night ?? Id throw it on **** !!!
Nope. This is older paintjob. Roddick is using GT paintjob atm....
Btw, this racquet is not for sale
BobFL is offline   Reply With Quote
BobFL
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BobFL
Old 09-05-2010, 06:47 AM   #62
kevoT
Semi-Pro
 
kevoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 748
Default

awww I wanted one
kevoT is offline   Reply With Quote
kevoT
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kevoT
Old 10-05-2010, 08:29 PM   #63
tiochaota
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 433
Default

is it really a 27.5 inch length racket?
tiochaota is offline   Reply With Quote
tiochaota
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tiochaota
Old 10-06-2010, 09:29 AM   #64
safinator
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 284
Default

Thanks Bob for sharing th pics and info with all the community. I've seen a lot of Fed's stick info around there, but the Roddick's are not so current.
Sincerely I am very surprised that he uses such a light raq in professional understanding, but perhaps with his serve style (shortened movement) and his strockes that are also quite short, the little weight makes easier to accelerate the raquet in such a short distance...
safinator is offline   Reply With Quote
safinator
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by safinator
Old 10-06-2010, 09:31 AM   #65
PED
Legend
 
PED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,193
Default

I think from the Pro specs I've seen over the years that alot of the pro specs are from 345g to 350g-especially the current lot. That's probably right in the middle spec wise of what most of them use.
__________________
You have my name, come find me. Just leave your nonsense out of this thread.
PED is offline   Reply With Quote
PED
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by PED
Old 10-06-2010, 12:55 PM   #66
Seth
Professional
 
Seth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 1,154
Default

For those experienced with customization, if one wanted to weigh/balance a stock PDRGT+ to match Roddick's, where and how much lead tape would be used?

I understand it won't be the same because of his being the swirly frame and silicon in the handle, but it would be fun to try anyway.
__________________
Get in where you fit in.
Seth is online now   Reply With Quote
Seth
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Seth
Old 10-06-2010, 01:26 PM   #67
whomad15
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 556
Default

I find it interesting that the top players racquets are all specced very similar (while different)
from other posts,
Federer is 364g, 6points headlight,
Roddick is 365g with 6points headlight (extended racquet)
Nadal is 335g, 3points headlight, the oddball being 30g lighter and more head heavy than the other two
whomad15 is offline   Reply With Quote
whomad15
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by whomad15
Old 10-06-2010, 01:48 PM   #68
PED
Legend
 
PED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth View Post
For those experienced with customization, if one wanted to weigh/balance a stock PDRGT+ to match Roddick's, where and how much lead tape would be used?

I understand it won't be the same because of his being the swirly frame and silicon in the handle, but it would be fun to try anyway.
You're looking at getting to 345g static and a balance of 33cm.

If you add 8g of lead under the bumper of the pdr plus, that will give you a static of 345 and a balance of 32.9cm. That's pretty spot on.

I will tell you that it will swing pretty heavy like that though: that puts the swing weight at 364.

I've got mine at 340g and a balance of 32.6cm and it's a nice compromise: you can really whip them fast but there's still alot of hurt on the ball with the weight.

Remember that Arod is modding up a regular PD. I did a similar setup on my 2 apd pluses: 15g in the handle and 8g under the bumper: that put me at 32.6cm balance and 342g.(NOTE: you can do the exact same thing if you end up with the PD in a trade) You can use two 1/4oz fishing weights, you can pop them under the trap door of the butt and use some cotton to keep them quiet: your cost: $1.50 at walmart Then just put the lead under the bumper and you're done.

The difference is that the weight on my apd's is now really polarized at the tips and it comes around a bit quicker than the pdr. But, the PDR feels more solid IMO.
__________________
You have my name, come find me. Just leave your nonsense out of this thread.

Last edited by PED : 10-06-2010 at 01:52 PM.
PED is offline   Reply With Quote
PED
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by PED
Old 10-06-2010, 08:39 PM   #69
LPShanet
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tiochaota View Post
is it really a 27.5 inch length racket?
Yes, it is.
LPShanet is offline   Reply With Quote
LPShanet
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LPShanet
Old 10-06-2010, 09:17 PM   #70
decades
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

how do you convert 6pts hl on a 27.5 stick to what it would be equivalent to on a 27 in stick? is it .982 * 6 ???
  Reply With Quote
decades
Old 10-07-2010, 08:20 AM   #71
LPShanet
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by decades View Post
how do you convert 6pts hl on a 27.5 stick to what it would be equivalent to on a 27 in stick? is it .982 * 6 ???
That depends on what you mean by "equivalent". The point system for balance is really just an expression in inches. So 6 points head light is 3/4" head light. This means that the balance point is 3/4" below the middle of the frame. On a 27" frame, that would be at 12.75", since the middle is 13.5". So the question is whether you're trying to find the same mathematical point on the 27.5" frame (which is fairly easy math), or whether you're trying to make the two frames feel exactly the same, which is much more fuzzy and subjective.
LPShanet is offline   Reply With Quote
LPShanet
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LPShanet
Old 10-18-2010, 10:27 PM   #72
BobFL
Hall Of Fame
 
BobFL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,699
Default

One spec was missing so here it is: Swingweight = 360
BobFL is offline   Reply With Quote
BobFL
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BobFL
Old 10-19-2010, 01:47 AM   #73
ART ART
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobFL View Post
One spec was missing so here it is: Swingweight = 360
Hi Bob,

How did you measure Rodick racket swing ?
ART ART is offline   Reply With Quote
ART ART
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ART ART
Old 10-19-2010, 07:07 AM   #74
BobFL
Hall Of Fame
 
BobFL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ART ART View Post
Hi Bob,

How did you measure Rodick racket swing ?
Babolat RDC
BobFL is offline   Reply With Quote
BobFL
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BobFL
Old 10-19-2010, 03:02 PM   #75
ART ART
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobFL View Post
Babolat RDC
Let's put it all:

Balance point: 13inches or 330mm
Weight: 12.1oz or 345grams
Swingweight = 360

Is this correct Bob?

Cheers
ART ART is offline   Reply With Quote
ART ART
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ART ART
Old 10-21-2010, 07:18 PM   #76
BobFL
Hall Of Fame
 
BobFL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ART ART View Post
Let's put it all:

Balance point: 13inches or 330mm
Weight: 12.1oz or 345grams
Swingweight = 360

Is this correct Bob?

Cheers
Yest it is! Just want to add that the length is 27.5"...
BobFL is offline   Reply With Quote
BobFL
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BobFL
Old 03-21-2011, 08:00 PM   #77
Fuji
Hall Of Fame
 
Fuji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada, Eh?
Posts: 4,444
Default

Sorry for reviving an old thread, but I am curious, did anyone ever find out what that foam was in the frame? I am quite curious as to what it is!

-Fuji
__________________
I believe what he says are nuggets of truth. And I collect them. And I store them in the lock-box of my soul. -JD
Fuji is offline   Reply With Quote
Fuji
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Fuji
Old 11-12-2012, 05:46 AM   #78
MauRod
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 20
Send a message via Skype™ to MauRod
Default

getting back to life this forgotten thread, what about the stiffness?
MauRod is offline   Reply With Quote
MauRod
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by MauRod
Reply
Page 4 of 4 « First < 23 4

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Pros' Racquets and Gear
Reload this Page Andy Roddick Frame :)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:34 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse