|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,859
|
Quote:
The digest calls for top down on the Roddick when you opt for 2 pc. The Digest also calls for bottom up on the Pure Storm for 2 pc. and top down for 1 pc. so the numbers don't really follow as it would be one way for 1 pc. and another for 2 pc.That in itself throws that numbering out the window. The Pure Storm is a natural for a 1 pc job, since the mains end at the top. I would string the Pure Storm Tour as top down no matter if 1 or 2 pc, as the beginning tie off is on a cross, I would use a starting clamp to begin,and then eventually tie it off as listed on the appropriate cross, as thats the best explaination why the Digest would have a 2pc. as bottom up for the Pure Storm Tour, for those who do not wish to use, or have a starting clamp. Last edited by jim e : 12-02-2010 at 02:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 698
|
Well, the USRSA agrees with onefromcov. The presence of a tie off hole that permits you to tie a starting knot on a main is the sole indicator of where to begin your crosses for a 2pc stringing. Therefore, according to them, the following Babolat racquets that can be strung 1pc top to bottom should be strung bottom to top when doing a 2 pc stringing. (Maybe before replying you might want to open up the Digest and have a look).
Drive Z 110 Cortex Drive Z OS NS Drive OS Pure Drive 110 Cortex Pure Drive 112 Pure Storm Pure Storm GT Pure Storm MP Team Pure Storm Team Pure Storm Tour Pure Storm Tour + Pure Storm Tour + GT Pure Storm Tour GT XS 109 Y105 Y109 Y112 Y118 |
|
|
|
| rufusbgood |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by rufusbgood |
|
|
#23 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
Quote:
Irvin
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 144
|
Thanks for all of your input ....I did ignore the numbering and I did and will continue to string two piece starting the crosses from the head..... By the way after playing with an 03 tour for the past few years the babolat roddick pure drive plus has been a refreshing change .....thanks again everyone
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 14,875
|
After listening to how Jim E strings Pure Storm Tours, I have been doing that racket 2 piece top down for 9 months or more now without any issues. It's much easier doing it that way with a starting clamp in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,859
|
Quote:
(Is just what I was saying as well, as I always used a starting clamp and strung top down on those Babolat racquets that have a tie off on a cross string) This is the USRSA response to me on this issue: "Babolat recommends installing 2-piece crosses starting from the head. But, this requires a starting clamp because the tie-off at the head is to be tied to a cross. If you do not have a starting clamp, Babolat allows the crosses to be installed starting from the throat". Last edited by jim e : 12-03-2010 at 09:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
^^ That is the same thing Babolat told me, except they said the reccomend all their rackets be strung two piece.
Irvin
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|