• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Pros' Racquets and Gear
Reload this Page Kuerten with yt Radical MP
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 5 of 5 « First < 34 5
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2010, 12:34 PM   #81
Azzurri
Legend
 
Azzurri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Next door to Elisha Cuthbert.
Posts: 7,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vsbabolat View Post
Early on in the Max200G production Light, Light Medium, and Medium were available. Shortly after only Light was available.
when did they first come out? I began using them in 1985ish (late Fall) if I recall. I guess then at the time I was not able to have a choice.
__________________
"I may come across as a Pete-hater, but I'm not. I have utmost respect for his abilities" Fed_Rulz 2011
Azzurri is offline   Reply With Quote
Azzurri
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Azzurri
Old 12-16-2010, 12:37 PM   #82
vsbabolat
Legend
 
vsbabolat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azzurri View Post
when did they first come out? I began using them in 1985ish (late Fall) if I recall. I guess then at the time I was not able to have a choice.
The Max200G came out in 1982.
__________________
Babolat ruined VS Gut and Tonic Gut with BT7. Why change a gut string that had been perfect for 135 years? It's now overpriced garbage.
vsbabolat is offline   Reply With Quote
vsbabolat
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by vsbabolat
Old 12-17-2010, 06:11 PM   #83
Azzurri
Legend
 
Azzurri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Next door to Elisha Cuthbert.
Posts: 7,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vsbabolat View Post
The Max200G came out in 1982.
I did find some information and indeed they had been in 3 weight versions. now I am going to be on the lookout for a lighter version. Do you happen to know what sticker code i should look for?
__________________
"I may come across as a Pete-hater, but I'm not. I have utmost respect for his abilities" Fed_Rulz 2011
Azzurri is offline   Reply With Quote
Azzurri
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Azzurri
Old 12-17-2010, 07:58 PM   #84
vsbabolat
Legend
 
vsbabolat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azzurri View Post
I did find some information and indeed they had been in 3 weight versions. now I am going to be on the lookout for a lighter version. Do you happen to know what sticker code i should look for?
Light or "L".
__________________
Babolat ruined VS Gut and Tonic Gut with BT7. Why change a gut string that had been perfect for 135 years? It's now overpriced garbage.
vsbabolat is offline   Reply With Quote
vsbabolat
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by vsbabolat
Old 12-17-2010, 08:03 PM   #85
Azzurri
Legend
 
Azzurri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Next door to Elisha Cuthbert.
Posts: 7,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vsbabolat View Post
Light or "L".
I will check my 200g that I have. any chance all the racquets after were L versions?
__________________
"I may come across as a Pete-hater, but I'm not. I have utmost respect for his abilities" Fed_Rulz 2011
Azzurri is offline   Reply With Quote
Azzurri
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Azzurri
Old 02-28-2011, 04:19 PM   #86
Big John
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 138
Default

Ok, trying to summarise all of this.. From my small experience with tgk frames, they may well come from the same mold as the retail racquets (but may not), are often made from lighter materials to come out lighter than the retail to allow them to be siliconed and leaded up to exactly what the player needs (makes a substantial difference from what I can see) and they can flex differently (amount of flex and places they flex) than the retail and this may be increased when they are weighted up?

Obviously there are a large number of longer TGK's around too, clearly going to play very differently from the retail. Extending retail racquets often makes them too heavy for many recreational players to use from my experience.

Currently using tgk 238.1's and pro stock flexpoint prestige paintjobs that come out much lighter than the retail and when leaded up at 12 play completely differently than the retail at a lighter overall weight but with much more head heavy balance.

Have I got this right please?
Big John is offline   Reply With Quote
Big John
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Big John
Old 03-06-2011, 11:54 PM   #87
LPShanet
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,619
Default

Mysterious double post. Sorry guys.
LPShanet is offline   Reply With Quote
LPShanet
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LPShanet
Old 03-06-2011, 11:55 PM   #88
LPShanet
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big John View Post
Ok, trying to summarise all of this.. From my small experience with tgk frames, they may well come from the same mold as the retail racquets (but may not), are often made from lighter materials to come out lighter than the retail to allow them to be siliconed and leaded up to exactly what the player needs (makes a substantial difference from what I can see) and they can flex differently (amount of flex and places they flex) than the retail and this may be increased when they are weighted up?

Obviously there are a large number of longer TGK's around too, clearly going to play very differently from the retail. Extending retail racquets often makes them too heavy for many recreational players to use from my experience.

Currently using tgk 238.1's and pro stock flexpoint prestige paintjobs that come out much lighter than the retail and when leaded up at 12 play completely differently than the retail at a lighter overall weight but with much more head heavy balance.

Have I got this right please?
Most of your info is basically correct. However, you've got the analysis a little bit wrong with respect to extended length versions. First off, they aren't really "extended", they simply cut them off longer when finishing the frames, as the racquet comes off the line much longer than stock, and they then choose what length they want it to be. More importantly, extended frames aren't much heavier at all then standard length, since the amount of added material is minimal. However, the added length does affect the balance, flex and swingweight, so they do have a different feel, and may seem harder to get around. However, with a little adjustment period, there is absolutely no reason why most recreational players couldn't get used to them...it's not that big a deal, it's more of a matter of preference, and whether the added length will give the particular person any benefit.
LPShanet is offline   Reply With Quote
LPShanet
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LPShanet
Old 03-10-2011, 12:57 PM   #89
JT_2eighty
Hall Of Fame
 
JT_2eighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,025
Default

This thread is full of so much awesomeness, I can't begin to describe.

Thank you all for brightening up my rainy afternoon!

Needs more high-rez pics too.
__________________
Austrian PT280s, for almost 20 years.
Have yet to find something new with this buttery feel and precision.
JT_2eighty is offline   Reply With Quote
JT_2eighty
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JT_2eighty
Old 03-10-2011, 04:38 PM   #90
marosmith
Professional
 
marosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lafayette, Or
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vsbabolat View Post
Sure they can. They can go out and buy a YT Radical MP and if they know Guga's spec customize it to match his frame.
so are you saying TGK rackets have youtek, or microgel, or liquidmetal technology? my understanding is not only are they lighter, but have a different weight distribution, and are all graphite/filler but no D30 etc...

If that is the case, how can you say they are the same as retail? Just the mold and drill pattern are the same.
__________________
3 Head PT57a 12.4 oz. 9 pts HL. 1HBH. Pair of PT167a for the wife.
marosmith is offline   Reply With Quote
marosmith
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by marosmith
Old 03-10-2011, 04:42 PM   #91
Doubles
Hall Of Fame
 
Doubles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Approaching the net
Posts: 3,406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marosmith View Post
so are you saying TGK rackets have youtek, or microgel, or liquidmetal technology? my understanding is not only are they lighter, but have a different weight distribution, and are all graphite/filler but no D30 etc...

If that is the case, how can you say they are the same as retail? Just the mold and drill pattern are the same.
The mold, drill pattern, and flex are the same. As far as I'm concerned it's the same racket. There is nothing special about using a TGK other than that you are able to better customize it to your liking. Personally I think that the Radical is light enough to allow you to do so, without buying a $299 racket...
__________________
All aboard the Gulbis bandwagon!
Doubles is offline   Reply With Quote
Doubles
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Doubles
Old 03-10-2011, 04:55 PM   #92
marosmith
Professional
 
marosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lafayette, Or
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doubles View Post
The mold, drill pattern, and flex are the same. As far as I'm concerned it's the same racket. There is nothing special about using a TGK other than that you are able to better customize it to your liking. Personally I think that the Radical is light enough to allow you to do so, without buying a $299 racket...
You think the flex is the same? There is a thread somewhere showing the TGK had different levels of stiffness from the RDC machine testing and some models specifically are the same mold but softer or stiffer for example.
__________________
3 Head PT57a 12.4 oz. 9 pts HL. 1HBH. Pair of PT167a for the wife.
marosmith is offline   Reply With Quote
marosmith
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by marosmith
Old 03-11-2011, 08:38 PM   #93
marosmith
Professional
 
marosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lafayette, Or
Posts: 981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doubles View Post
The mold, drill pattern, and flex are the same. As far as I'm concerned it's the same racket. There is nothing special about using a TGK other than that you are able to better customize it to your liking. Personally I think that the Radical is light enough to allow you to do so, without buying a $299 racket...
But you didn't answer the question about what the composition of the racket is.
__________________
3 Head PT57a 12.4 oz. 9 pts HL. 1HBH. Pair of PT167a for the wife.
marosmith is offline   Reply With Quote
marosmith
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by marosmith
Old 03-11-2011, 09:16 PM   #94
pug
Semi-Pro
 
pug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 490
Default

At this point in his career I would not be surprised at all if it was a stock racquet weighted to his liking.
__________________
Clean zone adrenaline causes this: an increased availability of speed, yet slowed down speed, relaxed speed..........KB
pug is offline   Reply With Quote
pug
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pug
Reply
Page 5 of 5 « First < 34 5

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Pros' Racquets and Gear
Reload this Page Kuerten with yt Radical MP

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:13 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse