ROUND 2!!! The GOAT bracket (00's) - the definitive pro popularity contest

[gunnd5000]

Hey

You are voting on who would win a match between player1 and 2, 3 and 4, 5 and 6 , and 7 and 8 in their prime or just upon who your favourite player in the match up is

After a fair time for voting (when there is a clear winner in each match up) or one week the poll will be closed

Please do not vote for 2 players in the same match up as voting will be public and both your votes discarded!

Match-ups (in draw format)

Federer [1] vs Djokovic
Safin vs Hewitt [4]
Roddick [3] vs Del Potro
Nalbanndian vs Nadal [2]


Seedings were based upon a mixture of year end top 10 finishes and grand slam titles

Other threads
Round 1
00’s part 1: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375304
00’s part 2: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375306
90’s part 1: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375308
90’s part 2: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375309
80’s part 1: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375312
80’s part 2: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375314
60/70’s part 1: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375316
60/70’s part 2: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375317

Round 2

00's: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375815
90's: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375820
80's: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375822




Previous round results

Nadal vs Davydenko 37-13
Nalbanndian vs Murray 30-17
Soderling vs Delpotro 13-33
Roddick vs Costa 44-2
Federer vs Gaudio 61-1
Kuerten vs Djokovic 21-34
Safin vs Johansson 53-1
Hewitt vs Gonzales 41-13


any questions ask

60/70’s part 1: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375316

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
still open for voting due to close ties

[gunnd5000]

60/70’s part 1: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375316

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
still open for voting due to close ties

[tenis1]

Originally Posted by gunnd5000

60/70’s part 1: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=375316

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
still open for voting due to close ties

As many said before pairings are incorrect and false. There is no [point continuing with this failed attempt.

[gunnd5000]

Originally Posted by tenis1

As many said before pairings are incorrect and false. There is no [point continuing with this failed attempt.

haters gonna hate and despite you keep telling me you are not going to participate you keep voting?

deal with it lifes not fair, wonder what happens when you get an unfair draw in an actual tournament? :P

[tenis1]

Originally Posted by gunnd5000

haters gonna hate and despite you keep telling me you are not going to participate you keep voting?

deal with it lifes not fair, wonder what happens when you get an unfair draw in an actual tournament? :P

The thing is you are completely clueless how to make correct and fair seeding and made these poll that make no sense whatsoever and will show nothing. It is not about fair or not it is about doing the right thing. And you are doing totally wrong thing here as I proved in the round 1 poll thread exposing it with facts and arguments. Still you kept these ridiculous false seeding just to push couple of your favorite players to the later rounds. Quite comical actually.

Roddick seeded #3 for the 00 decade. . With that you just proved you know nothing about tennis.

If you check I voted for all options in the polls just to sabotage them within my power.

[niff]

Lol at Federer

[gunnd5000]

Originally Posted by tenis1

The thing is you are completely clueless how to make correct and fair seeding and made these poll that make no sense whatsoever and will show nothing. It is not about fair or not it is about doing the right thing. And you are doing totally wrong thing here as I proved in the round 1 poll thread exposing it with facts and arguments. Still you kept these ridiculous false seeding just to push couple of your favorite players to the later rounds. Quite comical actually.

Roddick seeded #3 for the 00 decade. . With that you just proved you know nothing about tennis.

If you check I voted for all options in the polls just to sabotage them within my power.

most consitant high preformer of the 00's is federer followed by nadal then roddick, there is no debate here!

underlined stuff made me lol, sorry sherlock you caught me, my secrete agenda has been revealed!

facts and arguement, all you gave me was bunch of how many slams players won, which shows there ability in best of 5 set matches and fitness. In my opinion you sound like maybe a part time slam supporter or an ignorant poster to the value of masters titles, YEC, and top 10/8 status. Just my two cents

[tenis1]

Originally Posted by gunnd5000

most consitant high preformer of the 00's is federer followed by nadal then roddick, there is no debate here!

LOL don't be ridiculous. Roddick has no place being seeded #3 for the decade. You did that just to eliminate Djokovic early and push Roddick to the place where he does not belong. Hence your polls are huge fail.

Please stop spamming the board with them.

[gunnd5000]

Originally Posted by tenis1

LOL don't be ridiculous. Roddick has no place being seeded #3 for the decade. You did that just to eliminate Djokovic early and push Roddick to the place where he does not belong. Hence your polls are huge fail.

Please stop spamming the board with them.

you have 93 posts and about 10-15 are just you posting about my bias seeding. gimme a break this was just meant to be a luagh for posters and not some political factual serious, be all and end all, definitive arguemnt to who the greatest player ever is. THE TITLE IS IRONIC because we cant answer this question and no matter what happens in this poll it makes no difference now stop posting this rubbish on my threads

thanks
gunnd.

[tenis1]

Originally Posted by gunnd5000

you have 93 posts and about 10-15 are just you posting about my bias seeding. gimme a break this was just meant to be a luagh for posters and not some political factual serious, be all and end all, definitive arguemnt to who the greatest player ever is. THE TITLE IS IRONIC because we cant answer this question and no matter what happens in this poll it makes no difference now stop posting this rubbish on my threads

thanks
gunnd.

No what I am posting is not rubbish. Your threads and polls are rubbish. I told you already, you did a terrible job (either because being malicious or having no clue about tennis or both) when creating these polls. I have given you the arguments and proven you wrong. However you still put Djokovic vs Federer now while pushing Roddick as #3 seed. Simply ridiculous. Sorry when you do something like this that makes no sense you should expect that people will criticize you for this.

[niff]

Roddick has 1 slam + 3 finals in the 00s
Djokovic has 1 slam + 1 final in the 00s
*shrug*

[gunnd5000]

Originally Posted by tenis1

No what I am posting is not rubbish. Your threads and polls are rubbish. I told you already, you did a terrible job (either because being malicious or having no clue about tennis or both) when creating these polls. I have given you the arguments and proven you wrong. However you still put Djokovic vs Federer now while pushing Roddick as #3 seed. Simply ridiculous. Sorry when you do something like this that makes no sense you should expect that people will criticize you for this.

yawn my only big mistakes were missing ferrero out and the 80s draw. you keep posting the same arguemnts and now im getting bored. clearly my seeding cant have been that bad i mean all the match ups are close anyway, im sorry if you like djokovic and he isnt looking like he will go through and you dont rate roddick and he might, but so is life. Grow up its an internet forum not an offical statistical and techniqual annalysis of players carears. I appreciate you taking the time to care enough about djokovic to post these comments though. Its good to know that tennis has great fans who will follow their player to the end

[gunnd5000]

Originally Posted by niff

Roddick has 1 slam + 3 finals in the 00s
Djokovic has 1 slam + 1 final in the 00s
*shrug*

yeah its another fair point however to be fair djokovic has 2. I just dont see the case to seed him as he hasnt really been around long and its difficult to judge a carear based on 3 years of really good preformance. Also roddick wins the head to head with and also hewitt and maybe safin I think I'de need to check so i dont see any real reason to seed him in a different postition.

Another point is kuten was perhapse misplaced but with only 4 seeds stuff happens like that and you deal with it Guys just trolling and sucesfully too

[GoaLaSSo]

I don't see what the problem is...

I think its a fun idea!

[niff]

I do like a bit of Safin v Hewitt

[gunnd5000]

Originally Posted by niff

I do like a bit of Safin v Hewitt

you voted safin and he's edging it by a whisker at the moment

[gunnd5000]

ohh and whoopinstick voted for both nalbandian and nadal? so unless he replies and says who he wants to vote for his vote is disrgarded on the nalbandian vs nadal match-up

[lawrence]

voted hewitt to bring it even. but safin is awesome. tough one

[Tennis sensation]

My votes are
Federer
Safin
Roddick
Nadal

[gunnd5000]

Originally Posted by Tennis sensation

My votes are
Federer
Safin
Roddick
Nadal

mine are fed hewitt roddick nalbandian(nothing against rafa just more of a nalby guy )