|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 531
|
I like the KLIP Legend Tour a lot - and it comes in wicked BLACK.
__________________
Big Kahuna (5.0 SoCal) Head YOUTEK IG Extreme Pro 2.0 | Pacific Classic Gut 17g mains/MSV Co-Focus Poly 18g crosses 50/46 | Yonex Poly Tour Pro 125 46 |
|
|
|
| The Big Kahuna |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by The Big Kahuna |
|
|
#23 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 552
|
Quote:
Finally got a set of Co-focus 1.18 and strung it up on the crosses at 47. Believe it or not this is the 4th cross of strung on the same VS mains! (I know some people think this is nuts, but I'm not a string breaker and my stringing machine has a 6 pt clamping system so the hoop is very stable when I cut the crosses out, I can get a lot of life out of the gut mains by just replacing the crosses every 10 days or so). The mains had minimal notching but I made sure to weave the cross so the it overlapped in the same pattern as the previous crosses so it would use existing notches. If I did a fresh stringing I'd do VS at 56 and poly cross at 50 but knowing the mains had probably dropped into the upper 40's by now I strung the cross a little lower. Anyway, played 4 sets of doubs and a set of singles today with it. Felt great! Probably a little crisper than the Silverstring I'd been using. I have another frame recently strung with VS and Silverstring and really the two felt pretty similar. Especially towards the end of hitting today after the MSV had broken in a little. Great combo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: T-dot
Posts: 1,765
|
Quote:
__________________
Head MGPMs: Pacific Classic Gut 1.25 x MSV Co-Focus 1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: T-dot
Posts: 1,765
|
Cool. How many hours do you reckon you get out of your mains on average?
__________________
Head MGPMs: Pacific Classic Gut 1.25 x MSV Co-Focus 1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 552
|
Quote:
I strung the VS mains of this frame on Aug 1st @ 54lbs. Started with Lux Ace crosses, probably played only about 6-8 hrs before deciding I didn't like the crosses and stopped playing that frame. Aug 10 cut out the crosses and redid with SPPP 16g that someone gave me. I hated the feel of SPPP in this stick (EXO3 Tour) and the 16g felt terrible to me so probably on 2 hrs with that. Aug 16th I replaced the crosses with WC Silverstring and really liked that string as a cross. Probably played 25 hrs with that before cutting out the crossed and trying the MSV. Put. 4 hrs in with that yesterday. So that's about 35-40 hrs. And since I'm liking the MSV I can see sticking with it until it goes dead. Maybe another 10-20 hrs? Who knows, maybe longer. So I can see getting 50-60 hrs out of my gut mains. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: T-dot
Posts: 1,765
|
Update - 14 hours
There's not much to say other than playing with this is a real pleasure and a treat. Since about the 6 hour mark, the spin has been fantastic. I'm not sure how much of it is due to the Barry Bonds-style setup, but I sure hope that when properly done most of it is still there. Playing for the better part of an hour in moist to wet conditions 1 1/2 weeks ago has definitely reduced the mains' ability to slide back: while it's not very severe I'm now finding that I have to nudge them into place every 20 mins or so. I'm also finding that they appear to be notching faster, especially just outside the sweetspot -- so I've now put in 3 string savers. To what extent this is due to the exposure to moisture rather than natural wear is unclear to me. Possibly relevant to their longevity is the fact that under tension they look about the same thickness as the 1.18 crosses. Other than that, they really are wonderful to play with. String movement: minor Power: excellent Spin potential: excellent to outstanding* Arm friendlines: excellent Feel: excellent Fraying: virtually none Notching: minor overall, moderate at a few intersections Durability: keeps on truckin'
__________________
Head MGPMs: Pacific Classic Gut 1.25 x MSV Co-Focus 1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: T-dot
Posts: 1,765
|
Quote:
In all honesty it's a bit tough to answer because I've used different gauge mains with each of them. Overall I think I prefer the 18g if only because I prefer the thinner gauge mains that are with it. If durability becomes an issue, I'll try 16L mains with 18g crosses. Under tension I reckon that the mains will stretch and be more like 1.22-1.25 in thickness while the crosses will stay about the same.
__________________
Head MGPMs: Pacific Classic Gut 1.25 x MSV Co-Focus 1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 126
|
Smasher08,
After following both of your playtest threads I think I am ready to give it a shot with the gut/ cofocus 17 1.18 Before I string it up I was wondering if you could help me with the tensions. I know there is no way to know specifically for my racket, but just looking for general guidelines. Right now I string up my OS at 65 lbs with gut. I find the gut to be just a bit too powerful after it settles in. Since I will be crossing the gut with cofocus, should I leave the main gut tension the same? My thinking is that the crosses would help tame the power of the gut. Do you find this to be true in this setup? If I leave the gut tension the same should the tensions be 65 lb gut mains/ 62 cofocus crosses? I'm stringing it in these higher tensions because of my racket being an OS. I've read that polys are not meant to be strung so high. If I string cofocus up at 62 lbs, will I be killing the string? This is my first experiment with poly. Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 552
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 126
|
Quote:
However, thanks for confirming that the poly at such a high tension wouldn't work. I really do want to try this setup, but I'm afraid that if I drop the gut mains into the mid 50s in this OS, I wouldn't have control at all, even while using poly crosses. But then again, I have never used poly before so I really have no clue. Another thing to point out is that I have an eastern forehand and hit low to high through the ball (agassi) as opposed to whipping it with topspin (Rafa). Because of my swing type, should I just forget about trying this setup? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: T-dot
Posts: 1,765
|
Quote:
I'm stringing my gut mains 1 lb under the minimum recommended range -- and the poly crosses 4 lbs under -- without any problems. Sure, balls that would've gone 6 feet out now go 15, but I'm also getting a lot more spin, touch, feel, and power as well -- not to mention how arm-friendly it is. Factor in the fact that I'm also hitting more winners and high bouncing shots, and I find that the pros far outweigh the cons. I find that gut strings at low tensions don't act how synthetics would at the same lbs, so don't be too afraid to try it out.
__________________
Head MGPMs: Pacific Classic Gut 1.25 x MSV Co-Focus 1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 126
|
The range is 55 to 70.
What would you recommend? |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: T-dot
Posts: 1,765
|
Bottom-ish of the range.
Just remember: the whole point of this setup is to get lots of controllable power (ie power + spin). If you find you're hitting too flat, you may need to make a small adjustment or two so that you're generating more top. EDIT: Having thought about this further, I wanted to add a caveat since I don't want to give you bad advice: if you have a late 80s style OS racket to go with late 80s style swings, what are you looking for by switching to a more modern style string setup? If you purely just want to tame the power of full bed gut, why not just increase their tension? This string setup is very complementary to more modern swings: open stance eastern to semi-western forehands with Federer- or Djoker-like swing paths. So, for example, if you put one of these hybrids in McEnroe's racket, I'm not entirely sure that he'd benefit that much from it. But then again, Sampras seems to love full-bed poly in one of his new Babolats. So go figure. I wish I could offer you more certainty, but you're caught between two extremes here: (1) at higher tensions the stringbed locks up and you don't get as much spin because spin is dependent on the mains deflecting and then snapping back into place on impact, and (2) there is such a thing as too low wherein if you don't generate enough top you'll be launching moon shots. Of all the reviews I've read of gut-poly hybrids, I don't think anyone has reported using an OS racket before, so realistically you're probably going to be something of a guinea pig here. The risk of going too high is that while you may think it's ok you won't be getting the full benefits of spinniness. So my advice would be to go low, bottom-ish of your range, and then if it's still too powerful try putting in some string savers. That said, if you're not interested in potentially having to adjust your swings to generate more spin, then you should probably just stick to full bed gut and string it higher.
__________________
Head MGPMs: Pacific Classic Gut 1.25 x MSV Co-Focus 1.18 Last edited by Smasher08 : 09-18-2011 at 08:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 126
|
Thanks for the edit.
What you have described is the tough part for me of figuring out string setups. I'm still in my early 30s, so I grew up playing tennis during the Agassi, Chang, Courier, and Sampras era. So basically, this is the style I was coached, which is to hit through the ball going low to high. I think my grip is between eastern and semi-western. Back then, the only guy I saw hit with a western grip was a foreign exchange student from Spain who played on my high school team. I know I'll always be a flatter hitter (does not mean no topspin, just not rafa type topspin) because of the way I learned to play tennis, but I would like my string setup to give me the spin when I need it, namely for consistency during rallys and extra spin to put away the short balls. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: T-dot
Posts: 1,765
|
Quote:
First off, I don't think these strings will be durable enough for rafa-style swings, and second, you'll certainly benefit somewhat given what you said at the end there. The copoly crosses should definitely take off at least some of the power you experience from gut crosses and you'll probably notice more spin in any event. But you should probably start low, near the bottom of your range, if only because you potentially stand to gain the most benefits from low tensions. Good luck -- and please post your reviews!
__________________
Head MGPMs: Pacific Classic Gut 1.25 x MSV Co-Focus 1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 126
|
I know you can only give a general recommendation, but how does this tension sound?
I string synthetic guts at 65 lbs. Recently I strung some Performaxx whispertouch 1.2 gut at 65 and it was more powerful, yet manageable. I have been wanting to try out Pacific Classic and read here that it was lower powered for a gut. If I were to go Pacific Classic 17 main and Cofocus 1.18 cross do you think 63/58 would be low enough? Or should I go lower? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|