• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Is Djokovic now in the tier with Becker, Wilander, Edberg?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 2 of 13 < 1 2 3412 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2012, 12:33 AM   #21
5555
Professional
 
5555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jean pierre View Post
Vilas...
Vilas was never No. 1. Not even for only one week.
5555 is offline   Reply With Quote
5555
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by 5555
Old 02-04-2012, 12:44 AM   #22
NadalAgassi
Legend
 
NadalAgassi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,652
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abmk View Post
another clueless statement from the clueless kiki ...

Djokovic >>>>> Vilas

Djoker's era is weak ???????? LOL, that's as much as a joke as Vilas's draws to win the AOs were !!!! ha ha .....

Vilas had one "legit" GS win, in a full field ....USO in 77 ....... FO 77 win was only because borg didn't play ..... And of course Vilas' AO wins were against joke, weakened fields ....

Djoker has beaten either/both of federer/nadal in his GS wins ......5 of them, all against full fields .......
For once we agree on something. Vilas is basically a 1 slam winner really. One could argue Djokovic was a better player even before 2011 began. Now he is in a whole other planet from Vilas.
__________________
TMF on Jan. 2011- Serena is washed up for good, TMF in Oct. 2009- Nadal has won his final slam, TMF in 2011- Woz will beat Serena at U.S Open
NadalAgassi is offline   Reply With Quote
NadalAgassi
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NadalAgassi
Old 02-04-2012, 01:37 AM   #23
jean pierre
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5555 View Post
Vilas was never No. 1. Not even for only one week.
Everyone knows that in 1977, Vilas was the world champion, like said the magazine World Tennis. ATP ranking was absurd at this period : the number one in 1977 was Connors, who didn't win a Grand Slam !
jean pierre is offline   Reply With Quote
jean pierre
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jean pierre
Old 02-04-2012, 01:40 AM   #24
jean pierre
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NadalAgassi View Post
For once we agree on something. Vilas is basically a 1 slam winner really. One could argue Djokovic was a better player even before 2011 began. Now he is in a whole other planet from Vilas.

It's possible to say anything, but Vilas won 4 Grand Slams. On two opposite surfaces : grass and clay (even 3 surfaces because european clay and american clay are very different). Djokovic, Becker, Edberg, McEnroe, Sampras never did.
jean pierre is offline   Reply With Quote
jean pierre
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jean pierre
Old 02-04-2012, 01:45 AM   #25
jean pierre
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 529
Default

... and you can see here that Vilas's volley is much better than Djoko's volley.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjXvN1p79Gc

Ok, I know Marks was totally unknown. But he did a great tournament, played a fantastic tennis, and beated Arthur Ashe in semi-final after saving a match point. He was like Verkerk, Lewis, Pecci ... One tournament players.
jean pierre is offline   Reply With Quote
jean pierre
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jean pierre
Old 02-04-2012, 01:54 AM   #26
Talker
Hall Of Fame
 
Talker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,343
Default

Djokovic still has a ways to go.
To his credit is winning against both Nadal and Fed where Fed is still a major force and Nadal is in his prime.

If Djokovic wins RG it will give him a career slam and four in a row, a few more weeks as #1 and probably enough for year end #1.
A short amount of time but huge stats for over a year with no end in sight.
Talker is offline   Reply With Quote
Talker
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Talker
Old 02-04-2012, 02:13 AM   #27
5555
Professional
 
5555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jean pierre View Post
ATP ranking was absurd at this period : the number one in 1977 was Connors, who didn't win a Grand Slam !
It's possible to say anything, but Vilas was never No. 1
Quote:
Everyone knows that in 1977, Vilas was the world champion, like said the magazine World Tennis
In 1977, Tennis Magazine (France) ranked Borg #1. Lance Tingay of the London Daily Telegraph and Rino Tommasi of Rome's Tennis Club magazine also rated Borg first. ATP awarded Borg "Player of The Year". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World-n...layer_rankings
5555 is offline   Reply With Quote
5555
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by 5555
Old 02-04-2012, 02:25 AM   #28
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abmk View Post
another clueless statement from the clueless kiki ...

Djokovic >>>>> Vilas

Djoker's era is weak ???????? LOL, that's as much as a joke as Vilas's draws to win the AOs were !!!! ha ha .....

Vilas had one "legit" GS win, in a full field ....USO in 77 ....... FO 77 win was only because borg didn't play ..... And of course Vilas' AO wins were against joke, weakened fields ....

Djoker has beaten either/both of federer/nadal in his GS wins ......5 of them, all against full fields .......
You are so clueless about Vilas...well, 2 more years of Djokovic vs Nadal, and tennis will sound as exciting as a FISHING contest...jajajajaja
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 02-04-2012, 02:31 AM   #29
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jean pierre View Post
Vilas is more more more charismatic than Djoko, Vilas is a legend, and he's better too. He won on clay and on grass, he won 62 tournaments, he makes incredible records in 1977 : tournaments won in one year (14), and matches won consecutively (46). I think that saying "because borg didn't play" is absurd : who knows ? + that's not Vilas's problem.
About AO, a lot of people say that Vilas wins are not great victories, beacause he didn't beat top ten players, and especially Borg or Connors. I think it's absurd too. First, AO is a Grand Slam, you have to win several matches in 5 sets, so it's a great tournament. Second, it's not Vilas's problem if Borg and Connors prefered staying with their families for Christmus, while Vilas trained 7 hours/day on australian grass with only Ion Tiriac. And third, Vilas beated in AO great grass players of this era, like McNamara, Chris Lewis (Wimbledon finalist), Amaya ... And in 1978, it's not his fault if Marks beated Ashe in semi-final (it's sure that Vilas-Ashe would be a greater final than Vilas-Marks). And, last point, on january 75, in the Masters, on australian grass, Vilas beated Borg, Nastase and Newcombe !!
... and more important, during Vilas playing years he had to face: Connors,Borg,Mc Enroe,Newcombe,Gerulaitis,Nastase,Orantes,Panatta, Laver,Ashe,Smith,Kodes,Rosewall,Lendl,Tanner and a few ones...

Djokovic rivals other than Nadal and Fed, just suck, they never even dreamed of winning something bigger than a Masters Series.Weakest competitive era since Tilden and the 4 Mousketeers...
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 02-04-2012, 02:34 AM   #30
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NadalAgassi View Post
For once we agree on something. Vilas is basically a 1 slam winner really. One could argue Djokovic was a better player even before 2011 began. Now he is in a whole other planet from Vilas.
Yes, they live in 2 planets.Vilas that one called " Golden era" and Djokovic that one called " weakest competitive era".True.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 02-04-2012, 02:43 AM   #31
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jean pierre View Post
... and you can see here that Vilas's volley is much better than Djoko's volley.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjXvN1p79Gc

Ok, I know Marks was totally unknown. But he did a great tournament, played a fantastic tennis, and beated Arthur Ashe in semi-final after saving a match point. He was like Verkerk, Lewis, Pecci ... One tournament players.
Pecci was much more than a one shot guy.Great record along 1979-1981.great matches with Vilas, one specially at Washington (7-6,6-7,6-6 Pecci retired with cramps)

Vilas was a weak volleyer during his time, but would be superstar volleyer today...Djokovic and volley donīt fit in the same sentence.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 02-04-2012, 03:17 AM   #32
jean pierre
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5555 View Post
It's possible to say anything, but Vilas was never No. 1

In 1977, Tennis Magazine (France) ranked Borg #1. Lance Tingay of the London Daily Telegraph and Rino Tommasi of Rome's Tennis Club magazine also rated Borg first. ATP awarded Borg "Player of The Year". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World-n...layer_rankings
Yes, and french Tennis Magazine received a lot of letters from their readers who didn't understand this ranking. For World Tennis (which was the reference at this era), Tennis de France, Le livre d'or du tennis, Eugene L. Scott (Gros plans sur le tennis), Michel Sutter ... Vilas was n°1. And ATP should recognize today the "mistake".
jean pierre is offline   Reply With Quote
jean pierre
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jean pierre
Old 02-04-2012, 04:56 AM   #33
5555
Professional
 
5555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jean pierre View Post
Yes, and french Tennis Magazine received a lot of letters from their readers who didn't understand this ranking. For World Tennis (which was the reference at this era), Tennis de France, Le livre d'or du tennis, Eugene L. Scott (Gros plans sur le tennis), Michel Sutter ... Vilas was n°1. And ATP should recognize today the "mistake".
Can you find one reliable source which claims that Vilas was undisputed No. 1? There many reliable sources which claim that Djokovic is undisputed No. 1 http://www.anywhere.me/gresult?sourc...ed 2011&page=1
5555 is offline   Reply With Quote
5555
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by 5555
Old 02-04-2012, 05:31 AM   #34
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,501
Default

Vilas won 2 of the 3 majors, reached the final of the 4 th and the semis of the 5 th (Masters).results wise, he deserved the nš 1 spot.

Itīs like 1989, with Becker winning 2 of the big 3 ( and being sf at the third, the FO) and yet, Lendl, who didnīt win a major, ended up ranked nš 1.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 02-04-2012, 05:35 AM   #35
jean pierre
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
Vilas won 2 of the 3 majors, reached the final of the 4 th and the semis of the 5 th (Masters).results wise, he deserved the nš 1 spot.

Itīs like 1989, with Becker winning 2 of the big 3 ( and being sf at the third, the FO) and yet, Lendl, who didnīt win a major, ended up ranked nš 1.
That's true. Nobody can seriously say that Vilas is not the world champion in 1977. It's totally absurd.
jean pierre is offline   Reply With Quote
jean pierre
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jean pierre
Old 02-04-2012, 05:46 AM   #36
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,501
Default

In any case, Vilas played more years than 1977...

He was always a factor, from 1974-1979 in any GS, except Wimbly...played several times the USO sf and FO sf, was beaten in 2 FO finals by his nemesis Bjorn Borg, who also defeated him at the 1976 WCT Finals, after Vilas beat the swede, 2 years early, at the Kooyongīs Masters.

Vilas never did well enough at Wimbledon, but he didnīt have the talent to adjust to ultra fast Londonīs grass, while he had a month or so to prepare for Australian Openīs Grass...

from 1979 to 1983, Vilas was not one of the favourites to win a slam title, but I remember seeing him play extremely well in the first half of 1982 ( FO finalist, USo and Masters SF, winner of 4 or 5 TMS, beating handiliy Connors,Lendl in venues like Milan,Rotterdam,Madrid and Montecarlo)

all in all, one of the best representatives of the golden era.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 02-04-2012, 06:01 AM   #37
jean pierre
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
In any case, Vilas played more years than 1977...

He was always a factor, from 1974-1979 in any GS, except Wimbly...played several times the USO sf and FO sf, was beaten in 2 FO finals by his nemesis Bjorn Borg, who also defeated him at the 1976 WCT Finals, after Vilas beat the swede, 2 years early, at the Kooyongīs Masters.

Vilas never did well enough at Wimbledon, but he didnīt have the talent to adjust to ultra fast Londonīs grass, while he had a month or so to prepare for Australian Openīs Grass...

from 1979 to 1983, Vilas was not one of the favourites to win a slam title, but I remember seeing him play extremely well in the first half of 1982 ( FO finalist, USo and Masters SF, winner of 4 or 5 TMS, beating handiliy Connors,Lendl in venues like Milan,Rotterdam,Madrid and Montecarlo)

all in all, one of the best representatives of the golden era.

Very good post. I agree. Vilas is a real legend. The only real disappointment in his career is the French final against Wilander. He should win that match, and his fifth and last Grand Slam. He was unlucky, because he has a set point in the second set. But he lost.
But from 1973 to 1983, he was in the top ten, and even in the top five. Played a lot of great matches. He was also a fantastic Davis Cup player, even if Argentina didn't win the Cup : but Vilas in Buenos Aires won fantastic matches against McEnroe, Noah ... Fantastic period for the tennis. He did a come back in 1992, at 40 years, won a few matches and was in the top 400 ! Vilas loves the tennis.
jean pierre is offline   Reply With Quote
jean pierre
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jean pierre
Old 02-04-2012, 06:01 AM   #38
hoodjem
Legend
 
hoodjem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 9,964
Default

I really liked Vilas's clay-court game (and I loved his Head racquet). On my OAT-list, I have Vilas behind Djokovic already: Vilas at no. 31 and Djokovic at 25.

Djokovic can easily move up; Vilas can only go down.
__________________
The smart man thinks he knows a lot; the wise man is aware that he knows little.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote
hoodjem
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by hoodjem
Old 02-04-2012, 06:07 AM   #39
abmk
G.O.A.T.
 
abmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: India
Posts: 11,447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
You are so clueless about Vilas...well, 2 more years of Djokovic vs Nadal, and tennis will sound as exciting as a FISHING contest...jajajajaja
oh then enlighten me, oh wise one , which part did I get wrong about Vilas' GS victories ......

The joke AO fields or borg missing the FO ?

LMAO !

Face it , djoker >>>>>> vilas .....Only in your la la land of nostalgia, Vilas is close to Djoker , not in the land of reality ...
__________________
Becker,Edberg and Sampras would baggel him ( federer ) on fast indoor or grass more often than not. - the one and only kiki

Last edited by abmk : 02-04-2012 at 06:11 AM.
abmk is offline   Reply With Quote
abmk
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by abmk
Old 02-04-2012, 06:10 AM   #40
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abmk View Post
oh then enlighten me, oh wise one , which part did I get wrong about Vilas' GS victories ......

The joke AO fields or borg missing the FO ?

LMAO !

Face it , djoker >>>>>> vilas .....only in your la la land of nostalgia, Vilas is even close to Djoker , not the land of reality ...
What drugs do you take, young babies, to endure a Djokovic vs Nadal match? Any suggestion?
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Reply
Page 2 of 13 < 1 2 3412 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Is Djokovic now in the tier with Becker, Wilander, Edberg?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:07 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse