Anybody notice Djokovic's game hardly goes south during a match?

[jackson vile]

Originally Posted by celoft

If Nole's ROS had been this stable since 2008, as well as he knowing he was allergic to gluten four years ago, the Serbian could very well have 10-11 slams by now instead of just 5.

He really didn't need all of that, if he had it as easy as Federer he would have all those slams for sure. J/K

[dudeski]

Originally Posted by jackson vile

He really didn't need all of that, if he had it as easy as Federer he would have all those slams for sure. J/K

LOL All your hate is still not going to change the fact that Federer is the GOAT with 16 slams and many other amazing records. LOL

Originally Posted by jackson vile

He really didn't need all of that, if he had it as easy as Federer he would have all those slams for sure. J/K

Wake me up when Djoker or Nada do that.

They won't.

Originally Posted by Manus Domini

So you're saying that he would have won virtually every slam since 08 if he found out he was allergic to Glutton then?

I'm sorry, that just does not compute.

Eh, after AO 2008 and before AO 2011, 11 slams took place. If Djoker wins half of those, he would have 10 or 11 now.

[devila]

number of slams prove nothing about federer. if djoker had played sampras, laver and borg, there would be no harping and whining about federer's best level compared to them all. to top it all, federer didn't deal with physical problems as sampras and djoker did. federer didn't play tie after tie of davis cup for years then he lost his first tough match to john isner. LOLOLOL
imagine if he played more dc; roddick would've outlasted him in 2004 and 2009 wimbledons.

[Apun94]

Originally Posted by marcub

I beg to differ.
Fed went AWOL for two entire sets and came back to life in the 5th.
And to book that return on teh 1st match point solely on luck is robbing the man down of the guts to throw in an insane ROS like that.

You don't seem to realize the pressure of two back to back match points - both on Fed's serve.

You may be right, but I truly believe that he had lost that match when he was down 2 match points and so did Jokovic. Come to think of it, if Jokovic had messed that return up, everybody wudve criticized him for trying to go for such a big shot on match point. But it went in so everybody praised him for that. He took a risk, luck was on his side and he survived.
Another thing is that the reason Fed went AWOL was becuz Jokovic started playing CRAZY and desperate tennis when down 2 sets. Jokovic shud be given credit for THAT, not for surviving 2 match points. Jokovic definitely needed luck at that time...

[devila]

do some research before discrediting the goat djoker.
Jelena - On the match ball, against Federer..you tried..the most difficult shot, and Novak responds- How come? We practiced that shot for years.

sycophant fans destroyed fed's tennis attitude.