|
|
#1 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Francisco Fog
Posts: 401
|
I was looking at my friends string job and noticed that 2 of the knot tails were pointing down instead of up. I wonder how you tie and pull the knot down when it's mounted, instead of up when the and the advantages of this method? Depending on the direction of the string come thru next to your tie off string, i think it ties off more naturally if it is down.
Has anyone seen this or do this method?
__________________
USPTA P1, 5x Head TGK 237.2, Technifibre NRG2 16, 55LBS Gamma 2pt 6004 with Wise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Big Rapids, MI
Posts: 203
|
If you could take a picture it would help us identify the knot that they used. I haven't heard of a knot that naturally points down after being tied off before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
It is all in how you tie and pull the tail. If you go through the loop toward the frame and pull toward the frame the tail lays against the frame.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,470
|
OP, here is a Wilson Pro knot as taught via YouTube by Sir Irvin above this post:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Francisco Fog
Posts: 401
|
pvaudio, I wasn't asking in how to do a wilson pro knot. I was asking about the advantages of doing it from the bottom instead of the top, based on the side the string lays naturally next to your tie off string.
I figured out how to do it and it does knot easier.
__________________
USPTA P1, 5x Head TGK 237.2, Technifibre NRG2 16, 55LBS Gamma 2pt 6004 with Wise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
When pulling from the top it is easier to get the knot tighter against the frame I would think. Actually I have never really tried it the other way so I am not positive.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Francisco Fog
Posts: 401
|
Irvin, it depends on the direction of the string you're tying off on. The easiest way to explain is the difference between the 2 mains tie off. Main string on one side has the opening for the string to come thru opposite the other side. With the grip pointing down, the main tie off on the right naturally ties off with the tail pulling up. The opposite would be true for the other side. It's weird at first to tie a knot from under but it makes sense once its done.
__________________
USPTA P1, 5x Head TGK 237.2, Technifibre NRG2 16, 55LBS Gamma 2pt 6004 with Wise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
I don't tie any knot from under the frame.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,470
|
Quote:
![]() I also do not understand what "grip pointing down" means. You can string a racquet either way you wish to unless you've got a certain few in which case you'd end up doing your crosses reversed (the Babolat Y1xx series off the top of my head) Last edited by pvaudio : 06-18-2012 at 05:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 596
|
I'm guessing he means mounting the racquet on the stringer with "the grip pointing down". I always mount with the grip up. No idea why, just a habit I developed when I started stringing.
__________________
Head YouTek Prestige MP (18x20) - Wilson Nat Gut 17/MSV Co-Focus 1.18 (55/54) - Gamma X-Els |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
Which way the grip points can't have anything to do with how the knot looks. It is all in how it is tied and pulled.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Francisco Fog
Posts: 401
|
Irvin,
I never used to tied a knot from under the frame either. I tried it by reversing the loop from under and it does make sense for outside main (or second to outside) tie off. It isn't necessary with example pvaudio posted because the main tie off is on top and the angle of the tie off string out of the grommet isn't as sharp against the frame since it isn't on an outside main.
__________________
USPTA P1, 5x Head TGK 237.2, Technifibre NRG2 16, 55LBS Gamma 2pt 6004 with Wise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
Sorry I don't see it. I am going to continue the way I am doing it.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,470
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,859
|
The only time I will tie a knot from underneath the racquet is when the cross string tie off is on a cross string that is very close to the end main string and there is very little room, and that end main string that is there is right on top of that cross string for its weave, then I will tie backwards from underneath as you can rock the loop of the knot across the main and then cinch back over that main to snug it up nice.This is only time I can see why someone would tie a knot from under the racquet.
I know Irvin would understand this as he made a video where he plans on the proper weave on racquets that have this issue where the weave on the tie off would have the end main going under that cross string that way he can tie from top and cinch it back and forth across that end main, where for me I don't plan that to happen as it does not matter to me as I can tie from under as easy as on top so it makes no difference how the weave is. Knot that it makes any difference anyways. Last edited by jim e : 06-21-2012 at 04:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Francisco Fog
Posts: 401
|
I'll post a picture when I get a chance.
pvaudio, you're right you can't tie off a main string on the last main. That wouldn't make sense since that is the last pull for the mains. I meant to say the throat side main tie offs instead of top side.
__________________
USPTA P1, 5x Head TGK 237.2, Technifibre NRG2 16, 55LBS Gamma 2pt 6004 with Wise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,470
|
That still didn't answer my question since the rads and 6.1s I string tie off at the throat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Francisco Fog
Posts: 401
|
So what is your question?
__________________
USPTA P1, 5x Head TGK 237.2, Technifibre NRG2 16, 55LBS Gamma 2pt 6004 with Wise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,470
|
You are saying that there is a time where tying knots underneath the racquets are either necessary or make a lot of sense to do. You said it doesn't apply when the tie offs are at the head, which means that racquets which tie off at the throat apply. I string those more commonly than anything but my own, and I've never tied off underneath the racquet. I'm just asking what aspect of it makes it necessary to tie off underneath the frame if the mains end at the throat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Desert
Posts: 2,996
|
I see no reason to tie a knot from underneath.
All finishing knots start with OUT(over, under, through). On one side of the frame you go over to the left. On the other side you go over to the right. See the above picture.Post#9 One tail points right, the other, left.
__________________
Neos 1000, Eagnas Combo 810(home),Prince 5000(work) Member USRSA |
|
|
|
| fortun8son |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by fortun8son |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|