|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 935
|
People always bring up Fed-Roddick first in these threads, but it's a bit unfair because Andy has a better record against Roger than quite a few Top 20 players, as horrid as it is. Though they haven't had the same career in terms of titles and big matches, look at Ferrer (no wins) and Soderling (who has only one win against Roger, despite often having been trumpeted as a danger player against Fed).
Also, despite the lopsided results, most of those Roddick slam finals were more competitive than a lot of Roger's non-Nadal finales. Wimbledon '04, U.S. Open '06 and (especially) Wimbledon '09 were great matches, with Roddick winning five sets total, unfortunately for him three couldn't come in one tournament. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,979
|
Sampras - Ivanisevic
Loved them both but watching Goran lose always hurt.
__________________
regards, RJ |
|
|
|
| Russeljones |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Russeljones |
|
|
#23 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 398
|
17-12, Nadal leads. What's you problem? Don't know much about tennis? When you want tp speak about the things you know nothing about, you can always visit the ATP site with its massive data array, and look much more intelligent that you really are.
|
|
|
|
| MariaRafael |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MariaRafael |
|
|
#24 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 700
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Federererer |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Federererer |
|
|
#25 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,153
|
I think it's 19-14, and Nadal is one win away from making the Nadal-Djokovic rivalry mirror the Sampras-Agassi H2H (which was 20-14). The US Open final would be a great place to do that.
|
|
|
|
| 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
|
|
#26 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,482
|
Quote:
Gerulaitis beat Connors more often than not from the 1979 Masters onwards (FO 1980, CO 1982, Belgian Open 1982)
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70´s and 80´s" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 784
|
Agassi's 11-2 record over Jan-Michael Gambill, with the latter only winning three sets across thirteen meetings and winning one of the matches on a retirement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Puerto y Galgo....
Posts: 12,294
|
Did anyone mention Santoro vs Safin?
__________________
#1 Nadal fan : Surfaces are perfect the way they are. Funny how every time Fed loses, the surface is at fault. How about: the player is at fault? |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 18,385
|
Quote:
Edberg was just a nightmare matchup for Muster in every way, because Muster loved to go toe-to-toe in baseline wars and he liked to go through opponents as he wasn't as good with passing shots. Edberg would always hover around the net, hitting away volleys, and being a right nuisance It speaks volumes about Muster's fighting ability that he came close to winning a few of the matches, including one on grass at 1996 Queen's Club. However, I firmly believe that Muster would have beaten Edberg on clay in 1995-1996, but they didn't meet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 18,385
|
Goran had his moments over Sampras. I'm think of 1992 Wimbledon, 1993 Rome and 1996 Miami.
Last edited by Mustard : 08-02-2012 at 10:19 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 922
|
fed-hewitt is more a casualty o history than anythin else
2000-2003: hewitt dominated fed 2003-2005: goderer dominated hewitt at the same time that he was dominating every1 since 2005, hewitt has been a cripple with ankle, hip, toe problems. yet he has performed much better against fed than he did in the middle period o their rivalry - usually takes a set or at least pushes fed 2 a tiebreaker or two. when hewitt is fit, they usually have quite competitive matches kinda get the feeling that if hewitt had stayed in peak fitness til after fed took his finger off the god button, their rivalry would look a lot more competitive Last edited by TeflonTom : 08-02-2012 at 10:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 922
|
there are some pretty awful rivalries out there.
borg was the worst. v gerulaitis he was 17-0 and v vilas he was 17-5. watchin borg steamroll the tour in the 70s must have been borin as hell sampras-courier has gotta be one of the worst for two greats o the game. sampras led courier 16-4, even dusted him up on clay a coupla times agassi-ferreira is prolly one of the biggest dominations ever over a top 10 player. agassi not only leads 11-0, but ferreira only ever won 1 set against him. even more impressive since ferreira was 6-7 against sampras becker-edberg is my fav H2H rivalry, just cos its so schitzophrenic. becker leads edberg 25-10 but trails 3-1 in grand slams |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|