Tipsarevic: " Junior Boy will crush Serena Williams"

[mistik]

Originally Posted by tistrapukcipeht

I don't know why some of you is saying all this BS about Tipsarevic, He can choke as much as He can, still the level He plays and played against Ferrer (the best match of the tournament up to now) is a level to double bagel Serena and any WTA player if he wanted.

Sorry, but it is the absolute truth that any high level Jr can run over Serena and/or any WTA player, that simple.

Would they play with lighter balls (WTA) or heavier balls (ATP)?

The one thing ı guess you dont want to understand that women doesnt have any obligation to compete with men in sports.Tips ordinary player that no one will remeber once he retires.Serena historical player in women game.

[tistrapukcipeht]

Originally Posted by mistik

The one thing ı guess you dont want to understand that women doesnt have any obligation to compete with men in sports.Tips ordinary player that no one will remeber once he retires.Serena historical player in women game.

Still, what he achieved is harder than what Serena achieved, to win on ATP is very different from WTA, WTA is almost as good as Boy's Jrs Slam.

I understand that women don't have to compete with men of course, but men should get paid double of what women get paid, just because of how much harder it is.

Honestly I don't care about Serena, her personality is ugly, bogus and anything related to her is to be scorned.

[yemenmocha]

Agree junior could do it

[Tcbtennis]

Originally Posted by tistrapukcipeht

Still, what he achieved is harder than what Serena achieved, to win on ATP is very different from WTA, WTA is almost as good as Boy's Jrs Slam.

I understand that women don't have to compete with men of course, but men should get paid double of what women get paid, just because of how much harder it is.

Honestly I don't care about Serena, her personality is ugly, bogus and anything related to her is to be scorned.

Since Serena will be cashing her $1.9M check and Vika will be cashing her $950,000 check I guess that a Boy's junior slam isn't as good. Tipsarevic is upset because he will never cash a check that size because Djokovic, Nadal, Federer and Murray win all the big tournaments. So instead of working harder and finding a way to get past these guys he decides to pick on the "weaker" sex. He and Simon would have more credibility if they actually won something greater than an ATP250 on a consistent basis.

In the tennis history books the names of Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova will be there. The name of Janko Tipsarevic will be forgotten and his "epic" match (or choke) against Ferrer won't even be an afterthought.

[mistik]

Originally Posted by Tcbtennis

Since Serena will be cashing her $1.9M check and Vika will be cashing her $950,000 check I guess that a Boy's junior slam isn't as good. Tipsarevic is upset because he will never cash a check that size because Djokovic, Nadal, Federer and Murray win all the big tournaments. So instead of working harder and finding a way to get past these guys he decides to pick on the "weaker" sex. He and Simon would have more credibility if they actually won something greater than an ATP250 on a consistent basis.

In the tennis history books the names of Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova will be there. The name of Janko Tipsarevic will be forgotten and his "epic" match (or choke) against Ferrer won't even be an afterthought.

The thing is ı am not all that against what Simon brings on the table.If men tennis is more popular (which they are now) they deserve to win more money.However junior boy would beat Serena is a stupid stuff from Tipsarevic not even deserve a discussion.

[THUNDERVOLLEY]

Originally Posted by Tcbtennis

Tipsarevic is upset because he will never cash a check that size because Djokovic, Nadal, Federer and Murray win all the big tournaments. So instead of working harder and finding a way to get past these guys he decides to pick on the "weaker" sex. He and Simon would have more credibility if they actually won something greater than an ATP250 on a consistent basis.

Agreed. They come off as the typically bitter sexist whining about a field which is not responsible for either loser suffering from an utter lack of talent, no audience appeal or their apparent failure to work on beating the top players---but that's too much to ask, so they concentrate the ill feelings caused by their own feelings of insignificance on the WTA with go-nowhere theories or fantasties dripping with (among several things) career butthurt.

In the tennis history books the names of Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova will be there. The name of Janko Tipsarevic will be forgotten and his "epic" match (or choke) against Ferrer won't even be an afterthought.

True--Tipsaravic is of no importance now--or at any other time in his career. He may as well be a weekend park player for he has about as much chance of being a legend--or just win several majors as said park player.

[TennisCJC]

OK, I don't think the fact that Simon or Tispy can beat top WTA players means the men deserve more money.

The only arguments for different money is 1. do fans pay more $ to see men's or women's match, and 2. men do play 5 sets vs 3 sets at GS.

If fan interest is roughly equal and men only played 3 sets or women played 5 sets; then equal $ is fine by me.

But, let's get this straight Jack Sock would blow Serena off the court. A bad serving day for Jack would be like Serena's best serving day, and the serve is Serena's biggest weapon. The rest of the game would be an even bigger advantage to Sock. His forehand is harder, has more spin/movement and even more consistency due to the spin. His backhand is his weakess shot and would be equal to Serena's. He beats her 6-2, 6-2.

[mellowyellow]

Originally Posted by TennisCJC

The only arguments for different money is 1. do fans pay more $ to see men's or women's match, and 2. men do play 5 sets vs 3 sets at GS.

What you see in the matches is only part of the equation. Think about how much more training has to go on for the entire year to be able to play the way they do. Their is clearly more time and effort put in mentally and physically in the mens than the womens. You do not see men "taking time" to pursue other interest and half as-sing it through a modified schedule. This is where the men that say this come from, then on top of that its at the tourneys where that needed extra work to perform is not even rewarded, the 5 set slams. Is total BS and anyone that thinks equal pay is fair at slams considering these facts is drinking their bathwater.

[Vrad]

Originally Posted by Tcbtennis

Since Serena will be cashing her $1.9M check and Vika will be cashing her $950,000 check I guess that a Boy's junior slam isn't as good. Tipsarevic is upset because he will never cash a check that size because Djokovic, Nadal, Federer and Murray win all the big tournaments. So instead of working harder and finding a way to get past these guys he decides to pick on the "weaker" sex. He and Simon would have more credibility if they actually won something greater than an ATP250 on a consistent basis.

In the tennis history books the names of Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova will be there. The name of Janko Tipsarevic will be forgotten and his "epic" match (or choke) against Ferrer won't even be an afterthought.

Well said. Honestly, what sort of paychecks do you think Tipsarevic and Simon would be collecting if it wasn't for Federer, Nadal, Murray and Djokovic? Peanuts. The stands would be empty.

Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Clijsters, would fill far more seats than either of these 2 clowns. It is hilarious that they have the gall to complain about other people's undeserved earnings.

[West Coast Ace]

Originally Posted by Vrad

Well said. Honestly, what sort of paychecks do you think Tipsarevic and Simon would be collecting if it wasn't for Federer, Nadal, Murray and Djokovic? Peanuts.

Huh? By that pathetic attempt at Logic, today's Big 4 would be making peanuts because after the 90's guys retired all the fans would have disappeared. Fail.

[Milan]

Junior will easily beat Serena, everyone knows it.

As for the money question, Men deserve more money for the sole reason that fans attend their tournaments almost twice as much. Men and women are two separate events and should be regarded as such.

[Tcbtennis]

See, Murray took it to Djokovic and beat him and collected his $1.9M prize. That's all Tipsarevic needs to do now.

[THUNDERVOLLEY]

Originally Posted by Tcbtennis

See, Murray took it to Djokovic and beat him and collected his $1.9M prize. That's all Tipsarevic needs to do now.

Never going to happen. You could lock Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Murray in a cell for the two weeks of the USO (or any major) and he would still fail.

That is the one constant in his meaningless career.

[5point5]

Just to put things into perspective for you guys. Drunk, smoking, and past his prime beating both the Williams sisters.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karsten_Braasch

[drakulie]

Once again, attendance woes at Rogers cup for WTA:
http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Tennis/WTA.../20087486.html

and last year, the men had to help sell tickets for the womens matsers:

http://espn.go.com/tennis/story/_/id...t-andre-agassi

[Vcore89]

It is a known fact at the AO at that time. The sisters (we aren't supposed to call them by their names) thought themselves that they are at the men's level (not top level but...)...and so they got what they wanted from an unfit guy who overheard them (again, we aren't suppose to call them by his name; yes, he is German.) at that time and thus the easy spanking.

...thereafter, the sisters never said anything about beating men or boys for that matter till this day.

[MaxT]

Originally Posted by Seany

If she served well, it's be difficult to break her, no matter who you are, even Djokovic or Fed, doesn't matter what gender you are if there are 120+ mph serves smack on the tee...

If she didn't serve well on the other hand, most likely would be 6-0 6-0

Apart from that, Tipsy is completely right as it regards to every other WTA player.

What kind of if is that? Who can hit 120 on the tee consistently? If that, she can be No.1 on the ATP too.

[chatt_town]

I think men should make more but not because it's more popular, but because they play more(3 out of 5 sets). If we gauge it based on which is more popular all it would take is for 10 or 15 more nice looking women that can actually play to get on tour and wear some of those short skirts and they would be more "popular". So it's going to be hard to gauge what's more popular. It needs to be based on who plays and how much they play. As far as the conversation about how Serena would do against some man is rediculous to even have.

Originally Posted by mistik

The thing is ı am not all that against what Simon brings on the table.If men tennis is more popular (which they are now) they deserve to win more money.However junior boy would beat Serena is a stupid stuff from Tipsarevic not even deserve a discussion.

[jamesblakefan#1]

The joke just writes itself - Tipsarevic has to wake sleeping fan during his match.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2xO1...layer_embedded

Stands look quite full BTW...

[luvly]

Lol that was funny. Silly line judge.