Federer's mid 2000s era vs Rafa, Novak and Muzza's era... (Poll inside)

[Tennis_Maestro]

Thought I'd put this debate to bed since I jus had a face-palm moment in another thread.

Originally Posted by Cesc Fabregas

You're a joke, so what if Djokovic is 25 there is no guarantee he's going to catch Federer's hardcourt slam count as of now Federer is the best. Federer's era wasn't great but this era is a joke as well.

Refer to the bold, nothing else please, make your vote and state your reason if you wish to do so. Thanks.

[Cesc Fabregas]

Federer's prime was pretty weak in terms of great players but there was good depth 5-15, this era has a strong top 4 but after that it's all down hill from there.

[Tennis_Maestro]

Originally Posted by Cesc Fabregas

Federer's prime was pretty weak in terms of great players but there was good depth 5-15, this era has a strong top 4 but after that it's all down hill from there.

The part in bold < That is all it takes to deprive a person from winning several Grandslams and therefore that is the deciding factor for the top guys. Not for one minute saying Federer would not be sitting easily on double figures by now .... but ..........