|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 204
|
What's the difference between them?
May you classify them in overall? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,469
|
Unless the color really irks you, go with the original. Pure is slightly softer, but falls in every other category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 111
|
I had a reel of the pure 17 replaced bc the string would keep snapping during stringing. If I'm lucky to finish the string job, the string would break if hit anywhere near the grommets. The replacement reel wasn't any better. The only usable solution for me is to string it in the cross at low 40's. Reading the reviews, the original doesn't have this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,469
|
^^^ This is not true. The original is notorious for this issue. I'm actually more surprised that it still continues with the pure.
http://www.stringforum.net/board/arc...hp/t-1311.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 204
|
You mean "the original" as poly plasma? Not understading
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,469
|
Yeap, original as in Poly Plasma. He was saying that the Plasma Pure was bad at premature breakage, but for a long time SPPP was known to have the same problem. That's why I said I was surprised it was still happening with Plasma Pure.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|