|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 943
|
Federer is 76-32 in singles finals (70.37%) in his career.
Federer has lost to the following players at least twice in finals: Nadal (12), Nalbandian (2), Djokovic (3), and Murray (2). After Shanghai 2010, Federer had lost 6 out of his 8 previous finals. Since Shanghai 2010, Federer has gone 15-4 in finals. Since 2005, Federer has lost 5 finals to players not in The Big Four. Nadal is 50-21 in singles finals (70.42%) in his career. Nadal has lost to the following players at least twice in finals: Federer (6), Davydenko (3), Murray (2), and Djokovic (7) After Tokyo 2010, Nadal had won 43-55 of his previous finals. Since Tokyo 2010, Nadal has gone 7-9 in finals. Since 2005, Nadal has lost 5 finals to players not in The Big Four. |
|
|
|
| McEnroeisanartist |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by McEnroeisanartist |
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,706
|
Federer definitely has picked up the pace in finals the last 2 years.
20 slams and 90 titles is a big possibility for Maestro! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,289
|
It's awkward how the 7 from Djokovic were all from 2011+2012.
|
|
|
|
| underground |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by underground |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,981
|
Quote:
Djokovic in Nadal's. Rock paper we know already
__________________
regards, RJ |
|
|
|
|
| Russeljones |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Russeljones |
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
G.O.A.T.
|
Man what killer stats, a big, serious thanks man.
__________________
"Of course it's happening inside your head Harry... why should that mean that it's not real?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 18,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
And......?
__________________
Hoodjem - ''AHA!!! That's what TMF stands for Triumphant Muscles Forever.'' *** TMF, the ultimate Ken Rosewall ****. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,277
|
I wonder what Federer's record is when he plays Rafa in finals. Both overall and in slams, its bound to be disgraceful.
|
|
|
|
| RAFA2005RG |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by RAFA2005RG |
|
|
#10 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,277
|
Quote:
Rafa leads Djokovic 6-3 at the slams (and Djokovic only has a positive h2h at the AO). Rafa has won their last 3 encounters (including their last slam encounter). Rafa definitely owns Djokovic, no question about it. |
|
|
|
|
| RAFA2005RG |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by RAFA2005RG |
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,168
|
In slam finals, Nadal leads 6-2. If you include all their finals, Nadal leads 13-6 (so Nadal leads 7-4 in the non-slam tournament finals). Yep, disgraceful.
|
|
|
|
| 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,277
|
|
|
|
|
| RAFA2005RG |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by RAFA2005RG |
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,168
|
|
|
|
|
| 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,595
|
Enjoying a conversation with yourself NSK??
__________________
Intellectuals solve problems, Geniuses prevent them RAFA2005RG- "If he (Rafa) lost Roland Garros it would be like death." |
|
|
|
| RF20Lennon |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by RF20Lennon |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wales
Posts: 6,884
|
Quote:
__________________
"You used to be able to disagree with people and still be friends." - Clint Eastwood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 18,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,168
|
|
|
|
|
| 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
|
|
#18 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wales
Posts: 6,884
|
But he still lost them.
__________________
"You used to be able to disagree with people and still be friends." - Clint Eastwood |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,168
|
Djokovic beat Nadal 7 times in a row in a timespan lasting less than a year. So he dominated Nadal for a very short period of time. But it doesn't matter; Nadal still leads 6-3 in slams and 19-14 overall, one win away from tying the Sampras-Agassi H2H, and at AO 2013 he has the golden opportunity to beat Djokovic at all four slams and extend his dominance over Djokovic.
Advantage Nadal. Whereas Federer has been dominated by Nadal for his entire career, not just for a short period. |
|
|
|
| 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,168
|
By the way, I hope Federer is pointing to the exit in that avatar, since that's the way he's heading. Although, personally, I don't want Federer to retire, since I'd like Nadal to finish up his career having beaten Federer in the final of all four slams, and have at least a 4-0 hard-court slam H2H lead, including 4-2 at Wimbledon (if Federer goes deep at Wimbledon, which is unlikely) and 2-0 at the US Open. One more win at Roland Garros would be nice too, making it a career bagel (6-0).
Last edited by 6-1 6-3 6-0 : 10-06-2012 at 08:29 AM. |
|
|
|
| 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by 6-1 6-3 6-0 |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|