• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Miscellaneous > TW Questions/Comments
Reload this Page Playtesters: New PK frame feedback?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-17-2012, 11:52 AM   #1
JGads
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,228
Default Playtesters: New PK frame feedback?

Hey guys, I realize you likely won't be doing much in the way of official reviews and such on these sticks, but the descriptions of some of the new Pro Kennex offerings indicate you guys might have had a swing or two with them ("Our playtesters found that the frame offered..."). Just curious if any of you have any initial thoughts on some interesting looking new frames, particularly the Pro Kennex Black Ace Mid 2012 version (lighter swingweight, slightly added stiffness and thickness?) and the Q5 offerings, which by spec appear to be slightly stiffer, maybe more powerful offerings of the 5G/7G/Ki5 series?

Just wondering if any of you have any thoughts on these frames, particularly how they might compare to their predecessors (the Ace Mid to the previous Ace Mid; the Q5 light and heavy versions feel and ball action compared to 5G/7G/Ki5)... Or maybe they're more comparable to other sticks in a different line?

The Black Ace Mid and PK 7G are two of my all time favorite sticks, so I'm wondering about these PK newbies since they aren't up for demoing quite yet.

Cheers..
__________________
42

Last edited by JGads : 09-17-2012 at 11:55 AM.
JGads is online now   Reply With Quote
JGads
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JGads
Old 09-23-2012, 02:59 PM   #2
ced
Semi-Pro
 
ced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JGads View Post
Hey guys, I realize you likely won't be doing much in the way of official reviews and such on these sticks, but the descriptions of some of the new Pro Kennex offerings indicate you guys might have had a swing or two with them ("Our playtesters found that the frame offered..."). Just curious if any of you have any initial thoughts on some interesting looking new frames, particularly the Pro Kennex Black Ace Mid 2012 version (lighter swingweight, slightly added stiffness and thickness?) and the Q5 offerings, which by spec appear to be slightly stiffer, maybe more powerful offerings of the 5G/7G/Ki5 series?

Just wondering if any of you have any thoughts on these frames, particularly how they might compare to their predecessors (the Ace Mid to the previous Ace Mid; the Q5 light and heavy versions feel and ball action compared to 5G/7G/Ki5)... Or maybe they're more comparable to other sticks in a different line?

The Black Ace Mid and PK 7G are two of my all time favorite sticks, so I'm wondering about these PK newbies since they aren't up for demoing quite yet.

Cheers..
A lot of us would also be interested in your opinion as to how the Q5 compares to the Qtour you just finished reviewing.
__________________
I am entirely made of flaws, stiched together with good intentions.....www.weplaytennis.com
ced is offline   Reply With Quote
ced
View Public Profile
Visit ced's homepage!
Find More Posts by ced
Old 09-24-2012, 01:33 PM   #3
TW Staff
Administrator
 
TW Staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,447
Default

I will try and hit the Q5 with the QTour this week side by side. However, I might not be able to get out with them until Thursday.
Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse
TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/
Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse
TW Staff is offline   Reply With Quote
TW Staff
View Public Profile
Visit TW Staff's homepage!
Find More Posts by TW Staff
Old 09-24-2012, 02:28 PM   #4
ced
Semi-Pro
 
ced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TW Staff View Post
I will try and hit the Q5 with the QTour this week side by side. However, I might not be able to get out with them until Thursday.
Chris, TW
Great ... will be anxiously awaiting your opinion.
__________________
I am entirely made of flaws, stiched together with good intentions.....www.weplaytennis.com
ced is offline   Reply With Quote
ced
View Public Profile
Visit ced's homepage!
Find More Posts by ced
Old 09-24-2012, 06:02 PM   #5
JGads
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,228
Default

Chris, as a lover of Mids you should have a hit with the updated 2012 Black Ace Mid if you're able. Stellar frame.
__________________
42
JGads is online now   Reply With Quote
JGads
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JGads
Old 09-24-2012, 07:11 PM   #6
athleticstennis
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ced View Post
Great ... will be anxiously awaiting your opinion.
I am also will be eagerly awaiting for your opinion as a lover of PK frames.
athleticstennis is offline   Reply With Quote
athleticstennis
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by athleticstennis
Old 09-27-2012, 02:18 PM   #7
TW Staff
Administrator
 
TW Staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,447
Default

I hit the Q5 315 today side by side with the QTour.

I'll start with the 315. I really like that racquet. It comes around very quickly, yet feel pretty solid. I was getting a lot of spin with it and it felt better and better the faster I swung. I liked the comfort, too. On the feel front, it felt pretty modern. I could feel the frame breathe more than with a traditional box beam racquet. I wouldn't say it was overly hollow as the kinetic provided a dampened feel, but it is definitely more modern in its feel.

Out of the two, I preferred the QTour. I like the classic feel. The response is smooth and the feel is plush. I find great directional control with it and it is just closer to the racquets I'm enjoying right now such as the Prestige MP and C10 Pro.

Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse
TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/
Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse
TW Staff is offline   Reply With Quote
TW Staff
View Public Profile
Visit TW Staff's homepage!
Find More Posts by TW Staff
Old 09-27-2012, 09:17 PM   #8
JGads
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TW Staff View Post
I hit the Q5 315 today side by side with the QTour.

I'll start with the 315. I really like that racquet. It comes around very quickly, yet feel pretty solid. I was getting a lot of spin with it and it felt better and better the faster I swung. I liked the comfort, too. On the feel front, it felt pretty modern. I could feel the frame breathe more than with a traditional box beam racquet. I wouldn't say it was overly hollow as the kinetic provided a dampened feel, but it is definitely more modern in its feel.

Out of the two, I preferred the QTour. I like the classic feel. The response is smooth and the feel is plush. I find great directional control with it and it is just closer to the racquets I'm enjoying right now such as the Prestige MP and C10 Pro.

Chris, TW
So I'm guessing what you mean by the frame 'breathing' more than a box beam is that it's not as full... and modern meaning a tad more hollow than older offerings? I think that's what you mean. Cheers, Chris, for taking a spin and giving some feedback on a PK frame. I'll suggest one last time that you take one of the new PK Black Ace Mids out for a try -- I have a C10 as well (the Mac Pro Stock), and I was digging the IG Prestige MP you like as well, but this Ace trumps them for me right now -- more full feel/less wobble than the C10 and Prestige, and more plow than the IG MP though not quite the forgiveness of the extra square inches but it's a minimal difference. Really awesome frame.
__________________
42
JGads is online now   Reply With Quote
JGads
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JGads
Old 10-03-2012, 10:58 AM   #9
danix
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 500
Default

I appreciate the ability to get feedback more quickly than waiting for a full review.

I bought the QTour on faith, and loved the classic feel and power I was getting. But, in addition to bothering my elbow, it started bothering my shoulder, something that hasn't been an issue for several years. Its promise of a player's stick that didn't hurt was unfulfilled, for me (note that other feedback indicates people love it and it doesn't hurt them).

I switched back to the Ki5 and although I hate playing with it due to lack of feel and power, it doesn't hurt me, which is now my top priority.

The biggest question is not how the Q5 compares to the Tour, it's how it improves on the Ki5, if in fact it does. The biggest difference is the polarized Kinetic system (with the beads in 4 small pockets at 10/2 and 5/7 roughly). In terms of both lab and real world experience, how do the two compare?

I have a feeling I'm going to have to cough up another $180 to find out...
danix is offline   Reply With Quote
danix
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by danix
Old 10-05-2012, 04:02 PM   #10
TW Staff
Administrator
 
TW Staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,447
Default

Sorry to hear you had arm issues with the racquet. The arm issues you mentioned could be simply due to the change in weight and balance, and that change aggravated your arm. The QTour is flexible and has plenty of mass to absorb shock, plus we had four very different players hit it, and all raved about the comfort -- consider we hit it with poly strings, too.

I remember when I started testing racquets, my arm went numb after a month due to the constant change in weight/balance. I just increased my stretching/training and used ice until my body got used to the constant change.

Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse
TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/
Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse
TW Staff is offline   Reply With Quote
TW Staff
View Public Profile
Visit TW Staff's homepage!
Find More Posts by TW Staff
Old 10-06-2012, 03:13 PM   #11
JGads
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danix View Post
I appreciate the ability to get feedback more quickly than waiting for a full review.

I bought the QTour on faith, and loved the classic feel and power I was getting. But, in addition to bothering my elbow, it started bothering my shoulder, something that hasn't been an issue for several years. Its promise of a player's stick that didn't hurt was unfulfilled, for me (note that other feedback indicates people love it and it doesn't hurt them).

I switched back to the Ki5 and although I hate playing with it due to lack of feel and power, it doesn't hurt me, which is now my top priority.

The biggest question is not how the Q5 compares to the Tour, it's how it improves on the Ki5, if in fact it does. The biggest difference is the polarized Kinetic system (with the beads in 4 small pockets at 10/2 and 5/7 roughly). In terms of both lab and real world experience, how do the two compare?

I have a feeling I'm going to have to cough up another $180 to find out...
Danix, have you tried the 7G? It's softer feeling than the Ki5, so the arm should be fine, but has more power as well, which you're looking for. You may have a small adjustment to the extra length but it sounds like it could be what you and your arm are looking for.
__________________
42
JGads is online now   Reply With Quote
JGads
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JGads
Old 10-06-2012, 09:23 PM   #12
danix
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JGads View Post
Danix, have you tried the 7G? It's softer feeling than the Ki5, so the arm should be fine, but has more power as well, which you're looking for. You may have a small adjustment to the extra length but it sounds like it could be what you and your arm are looking for.
Never been a fan of extended lengths other than my beloved Volkl CX9.
Might be worth a demo, thanks. About to try the Q5 tomorrow.
danix is offline   Reply With Quote
danix
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by danix
Old 10-08-2012, 06:46 AM   #13
ced
Semi-Pro
 
ced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TW Staff View Post
I hit the Q5 315 today side by side with the QTour.
... ... ... ... ...

Out of the two, I preferred the QTour. I like the classic feel. The response is smooth and the feel is plush. I find great directional control with it and it is just closer to the racquets I'm enjoying right now such as the Prestige MP and C10 Pro.

Chris, TW
Thanks, Chris, I was expecting this and it backs up my feelings to the point I just ordered my third Qtour !!
__________________
I am entirely made of flaws, stiched together with good intentions.....www.weplaytennis.com
ced is offline   Reply With Quote
ced
View Public Profile
Visit ced's homepage!
Find More Posts by ced
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Miscellaneous > TW Questions/Comments
Reload this Page Playtesters: New PK frame feedback?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:02 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse