|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,083
|
where do you rank federer on the list as one of the greatest claycourters of all time? he only won 1 french open, but he lost to nadal in the semis or finals 4 other times. if nadal wasnt there, he could have 5 french opens. would you rate him above kuerten, brugera, courier who have more titles? i might rate him at least the lendl/wilander range who have 3 each. what do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,016
|
He's number 3 right now behind Nole and Nadal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: states
Posts: 2,768
|
no way novak is better than fed.
__________________
rdis 93 with lux adrenaline rough/syn gut @ 58/56 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lyon, France.
Posts: 2,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,184
|
1. Nadal
2. Borg 3. Lendl 4. Wilander 5. Kuerten 6. Villas 7. Federer Open era only.... |
|
|
|
| Gonzo_style |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Gonzo_style |
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,184
|
|
|
|
|
| Gonzo_style |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Gonzo_style |
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 446
|
imo, federer is a much better claycourter than lendl and wilander.
|
|
|
|
| Mighty Matteo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Mighty Matteo |
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lyon, France.
Posts: 2,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,184
|
|
|
|
|
| Gonzo_style |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Gonzo_style |
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,585
|
Somewhere from 8-15 all time. Most likely just outside the top 10 all time at 11th or 12th. Open Era alone I would rank him 6th behind Nadal, Borg, Lendl, Kuerten, Wilander in that order. There is no argument whatsoever for him being higher than 6th in the Open Era, but one could argue him being lower than Muster or Courier, and thus arguably lower than 6th.
|
|
|
|
| NadalAgassi |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by NadalAgassi |
|
|
#14 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 609
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,585
|
|
|
|
|
| NadalAgassi |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by NadalAgassi |
|
|
#16 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 609
|
Lol Bleacher report.
You their tennis writers are worse than their MMA writers. And that's quite a statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,585
|
No I dont. I ranked them 1st and 4th in the Open Era on clay, and Nadal 1st all time. Cant go any higher.
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
| NadalAgassi |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by NadalAgassi |
|
|
#18 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 609
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,823
|
Top 15, definitely, top 10, probably. Never really gave it too much thought, though.
|
|
|
|
| Prisoner of Birth |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Prisoner of Birth |
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,569
|
i'm actually writing a piece where i'm using bleacher report as an example of publications not doing tennis writing justice. lawl
__________________
88 |
|
|
|
| paulorenzo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by paulorenzo |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|