|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dallas,TX
Posts: 52
|
I just want one last opinion before I place my order. I am a 3.5 to 4.0 player and I am currently using the Head microgel monster. Unfortunately demoing isn't really and option for me. I want a low to medium power racquet as I want to generate my own power but get a little help from the racquet so I don't have to "swing all the way". I want a racquet that has a little more directional control but still without lowering the power. As for spin I do like to slice and use topspin as I am primarily working on a more "spin" game. Don't know too much about racquets but if there's just slight differences in the description above ill be happy to customize it. So is the Wilson Prostaff 6.1 100 right for me? All replies thanks in advance!
__________________
"Gotta Step it up!!" |
|
|
|
| BoomstickTPH |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BoomstickTPH |
|
|
#2 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,163
|
Quote:
Best thing is to look for a great racquet and play into it. If you are putting out dough, get the 90, you can get the same amount of spin and power, but it will be from your mind and not the racquet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dallas,TX
Posts: 52
|
Thanks for the reply. But I am primarily looking for 100sq head size as I don't really think I could handle the 90 in. Headsize as it will be to small for me. If I add some weight or customize it do you think it'll improve it to my style of play? Thanks
__________________
"Gotta Step it up!!" |
|
|
|
| BoomstickTPH |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BoomstickTPH |
|
|
#4 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 294
|
get the PS 100. I have one and I enjoy playing with it. It has that low-medium power you're looking for and you can customize it with lead tape at any point you need more stability or plow through. I string mine with a multi at almost 60lbs and it is arm friendly and has all the spin one can ask for if they swing correctly. its a really solid racket
|
|
|
|
| RollTrackTake |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by RollTrackTake |
|
|
#5 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dallas,TX
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
__________________
"Gotta Step it up!!" |
|
|
|
|
| BoomstickTPH |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BoomstickTPH |
|
|
#6 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dallas,TX
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
__________________
"Gotta Step it up!!" |
|
|
|
|
| BoomstickTPH |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BoomstickTPH |
|
|
#7 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,163
|
Quote:
If you insist on a bigger head, just get a large Bab and topspin everything, forget placing shots. I will say this, the K-Factor 95, I have one is great, not what I prefer as I have to "find" the sweetspot, but it's a great racket. Most of the top line racquets are fine, with exception, in my opinion to the ps 100, it's like it wasn't thought out, the head is floppy, weird, doesn't fit the BLX idea of solid hitting, that's just me. One last thing, I'm just telling you, people will tell you this and that on this forum, but a 90 makes you find the sweetspot and AIM each time, you may hate it for a month, but trust me you'll love it and improve your game with a smaller head. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dallas,TX
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
__________________
"Gotta Step it up!!" |
|
|
|
|
| BoomstickTPH |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BoomstickTPH |
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,805
|
It's a nice frame that does everything pretty well and is perfectly suited to customization. It has rare feel for a 100 square inch racquet. There is nothing Babolat about it. You can learn some things by using racquets not suited to your level of play - like 12.5 ounce 90 square-inch frames, for example - but it's probably better to choose a stick that fits your game as it is now, and then add lead tape to make it suit your game even better as you advance your skills and figure out what racquet characteristics enhance or complement those skills.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dallas,TX
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
__________________
"Gotta Step it up!!" |
|
|
|
|
| BoomstickTPH |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BoomstickTPH |
|
|
#11 |
|
New User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: In Transit, HQ
Posts: 8
|
It sucks that you cannot demo a racquet. I'd never buy one without trying one out first. You know that TW has a Demo Program, right?
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/demoprogram.html Anyway, I'm on the smaller head size camp. I think most people can pretty easily adjust to 95 sq. in. racquets or smaller. But ultimately, it's up to you and how the racquet feels in your hand. Which is why I highly recommend demoing a racquet first. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 979
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| sunof tennis |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by sunof tennis |
|
|
#13 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Boston
Posts: 887
|
I started with a 90" racquet and now I can use any size racquet that they make now. The problem with using a bigger racquet early on is that you will never be comfortable switching to a smaller model in the future. Unfortunately, there aren't a lot of small novice to intermediate level racquets on the market anymore. So I recommend that you find a 95" and train yourself to hit the middle of the stringbed. The feeling of a clean shot on one of these frames is very gratifying. And the nice thing about lower powered racquets is that they allow you to take a full stroke now and deliver more power when you're used to them later. You might want to take a look at this:
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/desc...LOP-DB2HL.html From there, the racquet finder button will give you a long list of similar racquets.
__________________
sharp < > lucid |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 9,957
|
Quote:
The bold part above exactly fits this racquet. http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Dunl...NLOP-DB4H.html
__________________
The smart man thinks he knows a lot; the wise man is aware that he knows little. Last edited by hoodjem : 10-09-2012 at 04:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ohio/Florida
Posts: 1,068
|
I love this frame I been using it since May the head pro in Maui showed me the frame and I've loved it ever since do some searches hear people complain about it that has never even use the racket
|
|
|
|
| guitarplayer |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by guitarplayer |
|
|
#16 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 120
|
I am a 3.5-4.0 long time Aeropro (original) user. I had been hitting a Prestige Pro recently and loved the solid feel and extra control. I was struggling with the Prestige being a little too unforgiving for me.
I had no intention of trying a 6.1 100 but hit it when a friend was demoing several racquets. I really liked it and ended up buying one. It has the similar solid feel of the Prestige, probably because of the foam filled handle. As others mentioned, it is light. I added about an ounce of weight and love it. Great pop on serves, excellent control, very stable, very solid feeling and much more forgiving than the Prestige. I get excellent spin and find it much easier to flatten out the ball when needed compared to the Aeropro. I also find that it looks, feels and swings like a smaller racquet. It is longer / narrower than most 100's which is probably deceptive. The main downside mentioned by most is the light weight. This obviously is an easy fix with some lead tape. You have the added bonus of being able to set it up with the exact balance that you like. Last edited by monomer : 10-09-2012 at 04:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,965
|
If you have to ask people, maybe you should keep looking. I think you should start trusting yourself on what makes you feel comfortable.
|
|
|
|
| cork_screw |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by cork_screw |
|
|
#18 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 105
|
IMO the 100 sounds like a good fit for your playing level.
Really nice versatile racket. Too light if you are playing against really heavy hitting competition, but otherwise great.
__________________
Babolat AeroPro Drive RG '12 SE, Dunlop Biomimetic F3.0 Tour, Gamma Razor 98, Slazenger Pro Braided (TW reissue), Yonex RDS-001 98 & VCore 97 (310g) |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ohio/Florida
Posts: 1,068
|
I added a little lead under the grip of mine. Wonderful frames. Great control, great spin, great feel, great touch, perfect weight as a starting point to customize if necessary.
![]() |
|
|
|
| guitarplayer |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by guitarplayer |
|
|
#20 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: In Transit, HQ
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
Also, if you like the way the PS100 feels, then you'll LOVE the way the PS95 feels. I used a 110 all through the 80s and early 90s. Then when I started working at a racquet club in 1995, I was able to demo about 20 different racquets (Wilson, Prince, Dunlop). I fell in love with the PS Classic 6.1 95. It helped that I was playing 4 hours of tennis a day, but it only took a couple of weeks to get used to the new size. 2 years ago, I switched to the PS90. This was a lot harder to adjust to than the 110 -> 95 adjustment, mostly because I'm a lot older now, and I only play once a week. But I absolutely love the feel of the PS90. I also have the nCode 6.1 95, which I pull out every now and then. I hit a lot better with the 95, but I love playing with the 90 much more. Much greater playing satisfaction. There's nothing quite like the feeling of hitting the sweet spot and ripping a forehand down the line. Maybe hitting a driver straight down the middle of the fairway 300 yards comes close. I've only done that like 10x in my lifetime (golf) whereas I hit a ripping groundstroke about 10x in one tennis session. I'm not saying that you need to get something smaller. Simply that you shouldn't automatically rule them out just because of the head size. Try one. You might like it. If you don't, then you can get something bigger.
__________________
Wilson BLX Pro Staff Six.One 90 Wilson nCode nSix-One 95 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|