|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 124
|
So I've heard this a few times from some great tennis minds, even some on this forum. That when you want to hit that winner, high speed, still topspin, low trajectory winner, to make your grip more western and have the racket face closed a little bit more on contact. It will be a fast forehand, but stay in because of it already being low and the topspin. It looks to me like Djokovic does this. Does anybody intentionally tilt the racket head slightly closed at the point of contact when ripping into a forehand winner? Or not fundament in your opinion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,568
|
Quote:
After a while all becomes a familiar feel and you still come out and rally to reinforce that feeling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 288
|
It is fundamental.
__________________
If you cannot set a good example, you will have to serve as a sad reminder. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 124
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,568
|
Quote:
Topspin FH/bh shot is produced by a good mix of low2hi, forward motion and some racketface closedness. If you remove any component, the other components will go out of whack and your shot will be very erratic. Don't let anybody tell you that you can do without any one component. And that's my 2 long paragraphs in a sea of posts dedicated to this phenomenon called topspin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,393
|
The swing path of the modern forehand has a higher vertical vector and to compensate for the extra lift, you tilt the racquet face. You also tilt the racquet face against topspin, because it pushes the racquet back and you tend to spray them high if you don't adjust the downward tilt accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,841
|
Everyone is doing it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,066
|
If you swing faster, you have to compensate with more spin, which means a closed racketface, yes.
If you want the ball to go faster, but flatter, you can slow your swing a bit, hit the ball flatter, and the ball goes faster. This requires a different setup, more body turn, closed to neutral stance, flatter swingpath, something you need to practice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,144
|
One thought: Be careful when thinking of your attempted winners as anything much different from your regular strokes. To hit with good pace and a good margin for error, you want to churn out enough topspin whenever you need it so that you (and the rest of us, too) can keep the ball down on the court. If you're thinking of going all in and doing something different whenever you try for a "winner", you might be trying to overcook it or come up with a miracle too often. Instead of winners, too many of those "different shots" can become errors.
Yes, definitely experiment with the idea of closing down your racquet face and taking a reasonable full swing through the ball. If that becomes your "rally mode" of hitting, you will have a better command of your topspin (and pace) more often. Eventually your "winners" will often be nothing more than those regular rally shots that you hit through open court once you get an opponent out of position. |
|
|
|
| fuzz nation |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by fuzz nation |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 124
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,568
|
Quote:
That really depends on one's skill and strategy at the time. Guys like Djokovic and Nadal frequently seemly go for 100% quite often, usually when there's a clear winner opportunity in sight (and they could afford to lose the point if they messed up). A good example of this is Djokovic vs Fed in the US Open semi (2010?) where he went all out and came back from multiple match points, and Fed complained that Djokovic played recklessly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,066
|
I doublt the pros really swing anything past 90%, which would be about 200% for us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,066
|
The point is, pros seldom miss as badly as us.
We swing 100%, shanking constantly when we do. Pros can shank, but it's probably more due to bad bounce or lazy read than an uncontrolled, furious swing. That's what. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,568
|
It's not about comparing us and pros.
I only pointed it out for the OP when he said "I find in tennis you can never swing as hard and fast as you can." It's very possible [for pros] to swing out of the mind that even confounds their fellow players, as in the Djokovic/Fed match. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 124
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,066
|
Cool, hope it holds up in match play.
Most of us are strong enough to hit winners if we can stand within a foot of the baseline. We need to hold back some to get the ball in, or hit heavy loopy topspin shots that use lots of energy. I'd rather hold back some, hit flatter, swing slower, and conserve some of my energy, but that's just me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 124
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|