|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 114
|
Both racquets have very close spec, anyone hit with both and appreciate sharing thoughts regarding comfort, power and playing characteristics.
Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 133
|
Without getting into a super long breakdown, I'll try to give you the main points.
*Disclaimer - I currently play with the P1 but almost bought the Slazenger. The P1 is more spin-friendly and powerful. The P1 is great from the baseline and good at net. The Slazenger is the best volley frame I've ever used. Precise, precise, precise. However, it might be the stiffest frame I've ever considered purchasing. Ultimately, my shoulder and forearm said too stiff. Serve and volleyers should love the Slazenger. All court players seem to love the P1. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,326
|
i think the slaz would play more like the pure drive and the pro one more like a prestige
__________________
wowzers |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 133
|
Quote:
Again, the Slazenger is a volleyers' dream, something I never found with the Pure Drive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 399
|
JMcQ
Have you ever played with Wilson 6.1 95s? I currently play with N95 but have been looking for something less demanding racquet to change. I just bought a P1 off this board and am hoping that would be my answer. If you can comment, I would really appreciate it. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,232
|
Quote:
Pro1: IMO swings much heavier than specs indicate. Easier pop on groundstrokes, more forgiving, sweetspot felt bigger. The P1 was definately more comfortable.
__________________
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=442896 http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=7236557&postcount=3 |
|
|
|
|
| Hi I'm Ray |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Hi I'm Ray |
|
|
#7 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 104
|
I've only had one string in this racquet, it's the Luxilon Big Banger ALU. And this racquet is too powerful for my game. I really struggle keeping the ball inside the baseline. So I'm surprised that some find this under powered on ground strokes. Does hit a big serve and is very solid at net, like others have stated.
No experience with the donnay. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Staten Island
Posts: 2,722
|
Quote:
Not big on P1, but I would chose it over the Slaz just because I'm more of a baseliner and don't play much doubles. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37eQtn3Hlb0
__________________
HEAD Graphine Speed Pro 12.3oz Last edited by Anton : 10-19-2012 at 01:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Clearwater,Florida
Posts: 331
|
I took both out for a demo and ended up purchasing 3 of the Slazengers. Now that I think back, I couldnt really find a fault with the Donnay. I purchased the Slazenger because I played better overall with it. To each their own but I find more than enough power with it on groundstrokes. Hitting a much heavier ball deeper in the court with ease. My serve has always been decent and earned some free points but my ace count has risen dramatically since the switch to the Slazenger. As others have mentioned it volleys incredibly well. As for the stiffness, Ive had wrist issues in the past and have yet to have a single twitch of pain from using it and Im using full bed of Beast XP in it.
|
|
|
|
| gamerx52986 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by gamerx52986 |
|
|
#10 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 114
|
I have tennis and golfer elbow, seems like P1 or Radical Pro could be the choice. Thank you guys for your input!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|