|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 26
|
Hi everyone,
This is the first time I'm posting in the string forum. I've been on the message boards for a while but mostly just for selling racquets. Anyways, it looks like guy/poly for the Wilson BLX 90 frame is supposed to be the cream of the crop setup for this racquet, but at the same time, whether it's cost-effective is another story. I was thinking of trying Technifibre NRG2 mains with MSV Co Focus crosses. Does anyone have any experience with this particular setup and if not, does anyone have any good suggestions for a multi/poly blend for this racquet that I should try? Thanks for your help, seems like we have quite a few people on this board that have a lot of insight. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
Since you're considering NRG2 mains, I'll try to break it down for you. Yes, the price of most gut is double that of NRG2. But you'll end up with a stringbed that will easily last you 4x that of NRG2 in terms of durability and playability. And if you're willing to take a chance and look beyond brand names, there are gut out there that cost the same as NRG2. But, if you must stick with multi for whatever reasons, I'd recommend Head RIP Control. It was my go-to multi's until I discovered gut. Great pocketing, comfortable (though some may call it a dead/mute string), great tension maintenance, and durable for a multi.
__________________
Wilson BLX Six.One Tour 90. 374g, 8pts HL, SW=355 (according to TW's calculator) |
|
|
|
|
| Say Chi Sin Lo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo |
|
|
#3 |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 58
|
TW is selling a relatively cheap gut/poly hybrid for $20 called "Becker BB Hybrid Natural-Poly String." It's one of the strings on my list to test sometime early next year (don't know if I want to test full gut or this hybrid first). I say if you're going to spend a little over $20 for two sets of string anyway, you might as well give a prepackaged, $20 gut/poly hybrid a try. You might like it!
|
|
|
|
| WilsonWand12 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by WilsonWand12 |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
__________________
Wilson BLX Six.One Tour 90. 374g, 8pts HL, SW=355 (according to TW's calculator) |
|
|
|
|
| Say Chi Sin Lo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo |
|
|
#5 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 111
|
Speaking of economical pre-packaged natural gut / poly hybrids, Klip X-Plosive is also $20.
__________________
Wilson Pro Staff 6.0 85. |
|
|
|
| lawrencejin |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by lawrencejin |
|
|
#6 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,475
|
Multi/poly is, IMO, the biggest waste of money in all of string setups. Gut/poly lasts longer and plays better, poly/multi gives more spin and control, poly/poly is self explanatory as is any other full bed. Using a synthetic in place of natural gut in a mains hybrid just doesn't work. Tried it many times and it just doesn't have the elasticity to work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,578
|
I liked my NXT Max mains and SPPPP crosses and thought it worked well. However, I think gut/poly is a much better setup. You will get more power and spin - possibly more spin than all-poly depending upon the setup. With the small head size of the BLX 90, you should maintain excellent control.
In the end, I think gut-poly (I use ToughGut) is much more economical than any multi/poly because it lasts much longer (and few, if any multis last longer than NXT Max). Last edited by NLBwell : 10-23-2012 at 08:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 26
|
Hey guys, thanks for the feedback, I knew I'd get some good responses here! So I had a spare half set of Wilson NXT lying around this morning and I just blended it with Babolat Duralast (a really cheap poly) and I'm going to test it out. I didn't get a chance to read your posts before I did it, but no biggie.
My friend has a Head Radical at my house now with Babolat VS mains and RPM Blast crosses and just the sound alone of hitting it on my hand is different from the blend that I put in, so I definitely feel that there will be a difference in feel for guy/poly and multi/poly setups. I guess I'll find out soon enough... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 26
|
Do you guys think that it makes a difference whether you have a cheap gut vs. an expensive gut in the mains for the gut/poly setup, and what do you all think of this MSV Co Focus? I'd just like to choose a good blend that isn't going to break the bank...thanks!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,016
|
I'm using a Solinco Tour Bite 18 main and Head RIP Control 17 cross and it is working great for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
Does expensive brand name gut play better? Yes of course, but does it play twice as well? I'm not certain about that. With inexpensive gut, it's a bit of a gamble because the quality control is not there. As much as half of your order could have imperfections that'll lead to pre-mature breakage. But once it's on the frame, cow collagen is cow collagen more or less. Before anyone goes after me for saying cow collagen is collgen blah blah. I acknowledge brand name gut plays better, but not twice as well as the price suggests.
__________________
Wilson BLX Six.One Tour 90. 374g, 8pts HL, SW=355 (according to TW's calculator) |
|
|
|
|
| Say Chi Sin Lo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo |
|
|
#13 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 26
|
Why do you put the poly on the mains? I thought the way to go was to put the gut on the mains for better playability? I can understand if you want more durability to put the poly on the mains...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
One more thing I want to add about these econo-gut, most if not all of them were never designed to withstand 55lbs, and they warn you of it too. So if you're looking to string tighter than 55lbs, you're going to have to pay for the big boys gut. While paying twice as much for brand name gut and their quality control may sound ridiculous, there is something to be said about a peace of mind. When you know the gut wont snap in the machine, or snap pre-maturely, that's worth the investment to some people. I have had several sets snap on me in the machine, or 2hours into playing, it's certainly annoying. But I also know how much I paid for them. While I do believe cow collagen is cow collagen, I also believe in the notion of what you get is what you pay for.
__________________
Wilson BLX Six.One Tour 90. 374g, 8pts HL, SW=355 (according to TW's calculator) Last edited by Say Chi Sin Lo : 10-24-2012 at 04:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Say Chi Sin Lo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo |
|
|
#16 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
To me, double the cost isn't worth it. I string my own frames so I end up saving a lot of "batched" sets.
__________________
Wilson BLX Six.One Tour 90. 374g, 8pts HL, SW=355 (according to TW's calculator) |
|
|
|
|
| Say Chi Sin Lo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo |
|
|
#18 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
I tried the NXT/Durablast blend that I mentioned earlier, strung at 50/52 and it felt like a board, not even better than a full poly Durablast blend. I probably strung it too tight. I saw that thread where Chris from TW strung his racquet with full poly at 30 lbs and apparently it played great. I can see that, since I have always been a proponent of stringing low for poly, even before I even came to this board, because it just tames the stiffness of the string. How does co-poly differ from traditional monofilament poly strings? I know there's a difference in feel but what provides that difference in feel? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|