• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Top 10 women players of all time at this point- where would you place Serena
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 7 of 13 « First < 56 7 89 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-2012, 01:00 AM   #121
Gizo
Professional
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,055
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
Peal Hingis owned the field.Peak Henin did not
Peak Hingis owned one of the worst fields in women's tennis history in 1997. Peak Henin owned a good quality women's field in 2007. I'm not saying that 2007 was one of the strongest years in the history of women's tennis or anything, but it was clearly a much stronger yield than the incredibly weak 1997.

In 2007 Henin won 2 slams out of the 3 that she played in and the YEC, won 63 matches out of 67, and in 14 tournament appearances won 10 titles, finished as a runner-up once and a losing semi-finalist the other 3 times.

She had winning h2hs that year against every single other member of the top 10 apart from Hantuchova who she never played in 2007, and all 15 of the other top 20 players that she played.

That's what I call owning the field.
Gizo is offline   Reply With Quote
Gizo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Gizo
Old 10-30-2012, 02:40 PM   #122
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizo View Post
Peak Hingis owned one of the worst fields in women's tennis history in 1997. Peak Henin owned a good quality women's field in 2007. I'm not saying that 2007 was one of the strongest years in the history of women's tennis or anything, but it was clearly a much stronger yield than the incredibly weak 1997.

In 2007 Henin won 2 slams out of the 3 that she played in and the YEC, won 63 matches out of 67, and in 14 tournament appearances won 10 titles, finished as a runner-up once and a losing semi-finalist the other 3 times.

She had winning h2hs that year against every single other member of the top 10 apart from Hantuchova who she never played in 2007, and all 15 of the other top 20 players that she played.

That's what I call owning the field.
Hingis played much more all time greats than Henin.henin never play Seles or Graf.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 10-30-2012, 09:17 PM   #123
Alexandros
Professional
 
Alexandros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
Hingis played much more all time greats than Henin.henin never play Seles or Graf.
Henin played Serena. 1 more =/= much more
Alexandros is offline   Reply With Quote
Alexandros
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Alexandros
Old 10-31-2012, 04:30 PM   #124
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexandros View Post
Henin played Serena. 1 more =/= much more
So did Hingis.Both played the 2 Williams.maybe Clijsters and old Davenport can be regarded as great opponents for Henin.maybe Capriati and Sharapova.But, except the russian, all of them played also against Martina.Hingis also had multislammers like Graf,Seles,Pierce,Sanchez,Novotna,Martinez...
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 10-31-2012, 11:13 PM   #125
abmk
G.O.A.T.
 
abmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: India
Posts: 11,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
So did Hingis.Both played the 2 Williams.maybe Clijsters and old Davenport can be regarded as great opponents for Henin.maybe Capriati and Sharapova.But, except the russian, all of them played also against Martina.Hingis also had multislammers like Graf,Seles,Pierce,Sanchez,Novotna,Martinez...
novotna/martinez were not multi-slammers , but whatever suits you
__________________
Becker,Edberg and Sampras would baggel him ( federer ) on fast indoor or grass more often than not. - the one and only kiki
abmk is online now   Reply With Quote
abmk
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by abmk
Old 10-31-2012, 11:14 PM   #126
abmk
G.O.A.T.
 
abmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: India
Posts: 11,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
Hingis played much more all time greats than Henin.henin never play Seles or Graf.
seles post stabbing was a very good player, but not "great" ....hingis didn't face peak seles who totally dominated from 91-93 ......
__________________
Becker,Edberg and Sampras would baggel him ( federer ) on fast indoor or grass more often than not. - the one and only kiki
abmk is online now   Reply With Quote
abmk
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by abmk
Old 11-01-2012, 02:12 PM   #127
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abmk View Post
novotna/martinez were not multi-slammers , but whatever suits you
I was adding the slams of them all, of course, I know that those players were not multislammers.Maybe, it was a language mistake, or maybe you just want to understand what suits you...

BTW, Hingis owned Seles, stabbed or not.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 11-01-2012, 04:45 PM   #128
BTURNER
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: OREGON
Posts: 2,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
I was adding the slams of them all, of course, I know that those players were not multislammers.Maybe, it was a language mistake, or maybe you just want to understand what suits you...

BTW, Hingis owned Seles, stabbed or not.
Do you mean 'would have owned' ?

Last edited by BTURNER : 11-01-2012 at 04:49 PM.
BTURNER is offline   Reply With Quote
BTURNER
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BTURNER
Old 11-02-2012, 03:21 AM   #129
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,476
Default

Osborne vs Navi would have been fantastic
Just like Hingis vs Lenglen, Mandlikova vs Bueno or Connolly vs Graf
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 11-02-2012, 11:35 PM   #130
Gizo
Professional
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,055
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
Hingis played much more all time greats than Henin.henin never play Seles or Graf.
Henin played Seles 7 times, including at the 2001 Aussie Open and 2002 Wimbledon. They had a decent set of matches against each other.

The Seles that was on the tour during Hingis's dominance of the tour in 1997 was not only post stabbing Seles, but had become a further emotional and physical wreck after her father was diagnosed with stomach cancer that year.

And Hingis lost 2 out of her 3 matches against a post-prime Graf. Plus she never had to play Graf in 1997 and her dominance coincided with Graf's long absence from the tour.

I assumed that Hingis would have won more WTA titles that Henin, but checking the stats they both won 43 titles, so Hingis didn't even have the edge there. Hingis was a great player but more of a interim and 'filler' world no. 1 keeping the seat warm in-between the Graf and Williams sister eras.
Gizo is offline   Reply With Quote
Gizo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Gizo
Old 11-03-2012, 03:00 PM   #131
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizo View Post
Henin played Seles 7 times, including at the 2001 Aussie Open and 2002 Wimbledon. They had a decent set of matches against each other.

The Seles that was on the tour during Hingis's dominance of the tour in 1997 was not only post stabbing Seles, but had become a further emotional and physical wreck after her father was diagnosed with stomach cancer that year.

And Hingis lost 2 out of her 3 matches against a post-prime Graf. Plus she never had to play Graf in 1997 and her dominance coincided with Graf's long absence from the tour.

I assumed that Hingis would have won more WTA titles that Henin, but checking the stats they both won 43 titles, so Hingis didn't even have the edge there. Hingis was a great player but more of a interim and 'filler' world no. 1 keeping the seat warm in-between the Graf and Williams sister eras.
30yrs old Seles.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 11-03-2012, 07:37 PM   #132
Gizo
Professional
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,055
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
30yrs old Seles.
The Seles of 2001-2002 was better than the Seles of 1997. The Seles of 1997 wasn't even close to being fully dedicated to her tennis, and understandably so given what was happening with her father. That year saw her in her worst physical and mental condition on the court. In 2002 she did well at all the majors, beating Venus at the Australian Open, giving Henin a huge scare at Wimbledon and beating Hingis at the US Open.

Really so many things fell in place for Hingis to dominate in 1997. A superb year but a huge of amount of luck in facing largely post-prime, pre-prime or emotionally wrecked competition. 2011 is one of the few years can I think of where the competition was worse than that.

To her credit she was able to hang around and remain a contender when a genuinely strong era emerged, but still she began to fall more into the background and was increasingly overshadowed at the big events.
Gizo is offline   Reply With Quote
Gizo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Gizo
Old 11-03-2012, 09:15 PM   #133
3fees
Professional
 
3fees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,015
Default

The one that wears the longest skirt.
3fees is offline   Reply With Quote
3fees
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by 3fees
Old 11-03-2012, 10:17 PM   #134
BTURNER
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: OREGON
Posts: 2,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3fees View Post
The one that wears the longest skirt.


There ya go! The winner - Dorothea Lambert Chambers
Wimbledon Singles champion: 1903, 1904, 1906, 1910, 1911, 1913, 1914
Singles runner-up: 1905, 1907, 1919, 1920
1903 Wimbledon Ethel Thomson Larcombe 4–6, 6–4, 6–2
1904 Wimbledon (2) Charlotte Cooper Sterry 6–0, 6–3
1906 Wimbledon (3) May Sutton Bundy 6–3, 9–7
1910 Wimbledon (4) Dora Boothby 6–2, 6–2
1911 Wimbledon (5) Dora Boothby 6–0, 6–0 The only such double bagel major final until 1988 Graf-Zvereva
1913 Wimbledon (6) Winifred Slocock McNair 6–0, 6–4
1914 Wimbledon (7) Ethel Thomson Larcombe 7–5, 6–4
Runner-up
1905 Wimbledon May Sutton Bundy 6–3, 6–4
1907 Wimbledon May Sutton Bundy 6–1, 6–4
1919 Wimbledon Suzanne Lenglen 10–8, 4–6, 9–7 longest women's final up to that time 44 games. Chambers was 40 year's old.
1920 Wimbledon Suzanne Lenglen 6–3, 6–0

a couple of years that were her titles for the taking, she was pregnant or recuperating from birth.

Yes she did have some success on red clay events. And here's a truly a relative point of distinction vs Mlle Lenglen. Lenglen's doubles partner of choice over the years was Elizabeth Ryan. Those two never lost a match together. They did however loose exactly two sets in all the matches they did play. Chambers was was part of the team that took those two sets. Larcombe and McCane were the partners. http://www.tennisforum.com/showthrea...=194278&page=2 Oh and she did beat Suzanne in straight sets. the frenchwoman was 14 years old. Evidently when she was 46 years old she traveled accross the pond to play the US championships and wightman Cup. she reached reached the quarters.http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/...mbert-Chambers

Last edited by BTURNER : 11-03-2012 at 11:05 PM.
BTURNER is offline   Reply With Quote
BTURNER
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BTURNER
Old 11-04-2012, 08:31 AM   #135
Amelie Mauresmo
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 419
Default

I think Martina Navratilova is the greatest of all time and not Steffi Graf. The Monica Seles stabbing really helped Steffi Graf and Arantxa Sanchez Vicario to win more slams when Seles was off the WTA Tour. Martina is the best because she did so well in singles and doubles.
Serena is definitely up there people seem to forget Serena is an incredible doubles player too she's won all the four grand slams and double Olympic gold medalist with Venus.
I think Serena might need to win the French Open ONE MORE TIME to help her legacy. I wish Serena had won the French Open this year.
Amelie Mauresmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Amelie Mauresmo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Amelie Mauresmo
Old 11-04-2012, 08:35 AM   #136
NadalAgassi
Legend
 
NadalAgassi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,577
Default

Nobody knows for sure what would have happened if Seles were not stabbed. However it is entirely possible Graf would have ended up with a record of say 7 Wimbledons, 4 French Opens, 4 Wimbledons, and 4 U.S Opens, and if she did most would still regard her as best ever, atleast until Serena. Seles was not going to win every Australian, French, and U.S Open for 6 years in a row, sorry but that is crazy to imagine, and she obviously was never going to beat Graf at Wimbledon either. Given that Seles managed 0 slams the last 7+ years of her career (an extremely weak showing even considering her various issues) even giving Seles a projected 6 or 7 slams from 93-January 96 would seem generous, and even that would leave Graf with probably around 4 or 5 of the 7 she won that period, having marginal impact on her totals.

I dont think Navratilova is better in singles. Graf on clay is way better than Navratiova, on hard courts they are closely matched on fast but Graf is way better on slower ones, Navratilova is very lucky the Australian Open was not on rebound ace in her day or she might have won only say once there considering she could only win it 3 times on slower grass, and that a 34 year old Evert walloped her on its first year on the court. Navratilova is only slightly better on grass and carpet. Graf is definitely a superior all surface player to Martina. However Martina probably should rank ahead because of her doubles career, just like Court should for the same reason. Evert should rank ahead of Graf for her longevity and consistency records. So I do still agree Graf is overrated and should not be rated the GOAT like she is by most people.
__________________
TMF on Jan. 2011- Serena is washed up for good, TMF in Oct. 2009- Nadal has won his final slam, TMF in 2011- Woz will beat Serena at U.S Open

Last edited by NadalAgassi : 11-04-2012 at 08:42 AM.
NadalAgassi is offline   Reply With Quote
NadalAgassi
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NadalAgassi
Old 11-04-2012, 01:59 PM   #137
BTURNER
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: OREGON
Posts: 2,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amelie Mauresmo View Post
I think Martina Navratilova is the greatest of all time and not Steffi Graf. The Monica Seles stabbing really helped Steffi Graf and Arantxa Sanchez Vicario to win more slams when Seles was off the WTA Tour. Martina is the best because she did so well in singles and doubles.
Serena is definitely up there people seem to forget Serena is an incredible doubles player too she's won all the four grand slams and double Olympic gold medalist with Venus.
I think Serena might need to win the French Open ONE MORE TIME to help her legacy. I wish Serena had won the French Open this year.
You know both Evert and Martina benefited in their major and tourney counts from the dual injuries of Tracy Austin and Hana Mandlikova which ended Austins career and severly hampered Hana's growth as a competitor. We don't even need to ask how much Jaeger might have been a threat. A generation of competition withered to nothing . If Austin grabs an open or two and Mandlikova wins a couple of grass majors either at wimbledon or australia in the 80's, they come from Martina or Evert, more likely Martina. Is the fact that Seles injury was an intentional act of criminal conduct that distinquishable when the outcome is the same? Fortune and misfortune plays a role in every champion's career. Not just Graf's.

Last edited by BTURNER : 11-04-2012 at 02:09 PM.
BTURNER is offline   Reply With Quote
BTURNER
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BTURNER
Old 11-04-2012, 11:43 PM   #138
DMan
Professional
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NadalAgassi View Post
Nobody knows for sure what would have happened if Seles were not stabbed. However it is entirely possible Graf would have ended up with a record of say 7 Wimbledons, 4 French Opens, 4 Wimbledons, and 4 U.S Opens, and if she did most would still regard her as best ever, atleast until Serena. Seles was not going to win every Australian, French, and U.S Open for 6 years in a row, sorry but that is crazy to imagine, and she obviously was never going to beat Graf at Wimbledon either. Given that Seles managed 0 slams the last 7+ years of her career (an extremely weak showing even considering her various issues) even giving Seles a projected 6 or 7 slams from 93-January 96 would seem generous, and even that would leave Graf with probably around 4 or 5 of the 7 she won that period, having marginal impact on her totals.
You don't say. I mean you DON'T say ? ! ? Because that's not what I've read from you before.

And scandalous! How could you possibly state Mons was not going to win every Australian, French, and US Opens for 6 years! She was Mons. She was born, therefore she wins! Have you truly lost your mind?!
DMan is offline   Reply With Quote
DMan
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by DMan
Old 11-05-2012, 09:43 AM   #139
TMF
G.O.A.T.
 
TMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13,590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NadalAgassi View Post
Nobody knows for sure what would have happened if Seles were not stabbed. However it is entirely possible Graf would have ended up with a record of say 7 Wimbledons, 4 French Opens, 4 Wimbledons, and 4 U.S Opens, and if she did most would still regard her as best ever, atleast until Serena. Seles was not going to win every Australian, French, and U.S Open for 6 years in a row, sorry but that is crazy to imagine, and she obviously was never going to beat Graf at Wimbledon either. Given that Seles managed 0 slams the last 7+ years of her career (an extremely weak showing even considering her various issues) even giving Seles a projected 6 or 7 slams from 93-January 96 would seem generous, and even that would leave Graf with probably around 4 or 5 of the 7 she won that period, having marginal impact on her totals.
Could you stop including Serena. She's not in the goat conversation(not yet). However, she is in the top 10.
__________________
NadalAgassi: I think Serena's final slam tally will be something from 18-27. My best guess is 24 or 25 though; Nole(2010) will never win Wimbledon
TMF is offline   Reply With Quote
TMF
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TMF
Old 12-26-2012, 10:54 AM   #140
chatt_town
Professional
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,114
Default

No doubt she is clearly a top 5 player. I think Martina was the only one better because she excelled so much and in all 3 different phases(singles, doubles and mixed) and she did it for so long.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TMF View Post
Could you stop including Serena. She's not in the goat conversation(not yet). However, she is in the top 10.
chatt_town is offline   Reply With Quote
chatt_town
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by chatt_town
Reply
Page 7 of 13 « First < 56 7 89 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Top 10 women players of all time at this point- where would you place Serena

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:58 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse