|
|
#41 | ||
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,076
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
bugeyed must be choosing his words or he does not want to admit the truth but you seem to understand where I am going with this. Do you know how a lockout tension works? Or would you like me to tell you?
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,076
|
what's clear is that don't understand how and why the diabolo works. since the diabolo and gripper are both fixed to the tension head which triggers the lockout to lock once the tension head reaches the reference tension. the lockout doesn't care what's holding the tension (the diabolo or the gripper). think of the diabolo as hand 1 and the gripper as hand 2. both are fixed to the tension head. the lockout could care less if hand 1 or hand 2 is holding the 60#s of tension or if both are supporting the 60#s. it's going to lockout when the head reaches 60#s. as the tension head pulls, the string wrapped around the diabolo grips tighter and tighter around the spool meaning that the string gripper doesn't need to clamp as hard on the string to prevent it from slipping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
So am I. I said there was no difference. If there was a difference why could the scale detect it? You guys said there was.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
Quote:
Here is how the diablo works and what it is for. If you wrap the string around the diablo the angle of the string going into the gripper never changes. Whether there is no tension or 70 lbs of tension the angle stays the same. That means the string on the leading edge of the gripper stays in the same place instead of sliding up or down in the gripper and damaging the string. But it make a little more of a difference in a lockout stringer. When using a lockout the gripper assembly pivots on the front bottom edge of the gripper assembly. The string resists the tension from the pulling force and rocks the gripper assembly up. A catch slide over a braking pin and locks out the tensioner. if you do not wrap the string around the diablo the string will actually be above the diablo (on my machine) increasing the angle going into the gripper. But more importantly the string is pulling the gripper assembly up from a greater radius and you will have less tension because it takes less force to lock it out. EDIT: If the diablo removes any force from the string pulling on the gripper assembly (assume 50%) it would result in the tension in the racket being doubled because it would take two time the force to lift the gripper assembly required for lockout.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' Last edited by Irvin : 11-09-2012 at 10:31 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
As a matter of fact this is what i said|
Quote:
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tx
Posts: 537
|
Quote:
Cheers, kev
__________________
I just think that things should work the way I expect them to. Pure Storm GT primarily Last edited by bugeyed : 11-09-2012 at 10:54 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
Quote:
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' Last edited by Irvin : 11-09-2012 at 11:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tx
Posts: 537
|
My statements regarding lessened tension at the linear gripper are based on the Babolat machines & not lock out machines. On the CP machines, the gripper & diabolo relationship never changes. The "pull" is measured as the whole assembly moves. If Irvin is basing all of his argument on a lock out mechanism, that is a different issue, although his early statement that "I believe I seen a Babolat video that said it relieves the pressure on the gripper. Can't understand that but who am i to argue", would indicate that he was talking about the Babolat configuration as well.
Cheers, kev
__________________
I just think that things should work the way I expect them to. Pure Storm GT primarily |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,076
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tx
Posts: 537
|
Quote:
Edit: Yep, Irvin said, "The diablo on Gamma is fixed it can not move only the gripper rocks to lockout." There is the disconnect! I think. I'm so tired of this now!!! Cheers, kev
__________________
I just think that things should work the way I expect them to. Pure Storm GT primarily Last edited by bugeyed : 11-09-2012 at 11:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
I was talking about the Babolat configuration. I makes not difference if you have an electronic or lockout the diablo can not and does not lessen the stress on the string in the gripper. If you take a Babolat machine and run the string straight through the gripper and not around the diablo it will not make a difference.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
Quote:
EDIT: And that is the whole point of my argument that it works the same on an electronic (like a Babolat) as it does on a lockout (like my Gamma 6004.) It is just easier tonshow how the force on a lockout gripper has to be the same whether you go throu the diabloor not.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' Last edited by Irvin : 11-09-2012 at 11:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 525
|
^ This may sound like a stupid question but can you get a diablo to fit a neos 1500?
|
|
|
|
| Roger Wawrinka |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Roger Wawrinka |
|
|
#56 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
Probably but it will not take any stress of the gripper.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tx
Posts: 537
|
Yes it will! Lessens the crushing of delicate strings. Or has this been covered before? It's like Deja vu all over again!
P.S. I gotta go to the store, so good luck all! Hope you can figure it all out. Cheers, kev
__________________
I just think that things should work the way I expect them to. Pure Storm GT primarily |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 1,887
|
The diablo, er diabolo, on my 6004 does NOT move with the pivoting gripper mechanism, it is fixed to the tension head which does NOT rock/lock with lockout. Not sure what we are arguing here, just noting a fact.
As such, the gripper must place the same amount of grip whether the diabolo is used or not. it DOES, however, help out with the string angle going into the gripper. Again, just stating a fact. I use it unless it is inconvenient, which is only occasionally, like when i start my mains.....even then i COULD use it, just don't........or if i'm short on string at the end of M/X. Also, tension seems to pull the same, with or without. I have checked out of curiosity, just got the machine and thus a diablO last summer. I had never owned a machine with one (a diabOLO) before, only used them a couple times. Carry on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
|
Thanks tbuggle. But I'm sure if you look real close you will notice the pivot point on the lower front of the gripper is fixed in position to the diablo. That distance never changes. As the whole assembly moves back and forth they move together. The only thing that rocks is the gripper assembly about the pivot.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Other than answer the OP's question I decided not to get involved with the "discussion", until now.
A majority of top end machines have diabolos on them. There must be a reason why they're included. When the Babolat Sensor was released there was wonder why a diabolo wasn't included, and this is part of the reason it was included on the Star 5. At the French Open last year all the stringers were asked what they thought should be on their new machine, and a diabolo was one of the requirements that stringers wanted. What a diabolo can also help with is the gripping point on the string. If you want to move the gripping point to a different point due it falling on a position where it could be at a critical point i.e. a bend, wrapping the string around the diabolo once or twice will help. Try and do that with a Sensor and it's a harder process to do as you'll have to let the tension head travel a bit before allowing to grip the string. So, I believe the diabolo reduces the stress on the string, and the companies that make the machines seem to think that the inclusion of it is a good idea. And that is good for me. Regards Paul
__________________
Head IG Prestige MP; USRSA MRT, Wimbledon stringing team since '04; Babolat stringing team '10-'13. Twitter - @therqtstringer |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|