|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 161
|
It is always said that a loop takeback is better than a straight takeback due to creation of momentum and racquet head speed, also the power. But if i'm not totally blind, after turning the hip and torso, most of the looped forehands take a break and the racquet goes back again before it goes for the ball. Not sure if i can explain it but look at that video of rafa hitting;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inQvbT8uEGk After the racquet drops, he moves his torso and first the racquets stops the motion, then it goes back with the lag that body turn creates, and lastly go forward to hit the ball. That means all the momentum that created with a loop takeback is destroyed just before hitting the ball and a loop takeback has no difference compared to a straight one in the words of power and racquet head speed. Can somebody explain me that situation ?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 266
|
It seems the downward momentum of the racquet dropping is not very relevant here. The reason a loop is so commonly used is because it assures a good shoulder turn and good overall coil in prep for the shot. Also, any swing has a point where the racquet changes direction; it's almost like a whip cracking, where you need to quickly move the whip in the direction opposite its motion to create the desired acceleration and RHS. The momentum may have stopped momentarily, but what's more important is Nadal's stored energy, combined with the racquet being in the correct position, makes for a technically sound shot. Again, it forces a good load (the energy from which is later converted to RHS), puts the racquet in a good position, and often helps timing.
Last edited by psv255 : 11-11-2012 at 07:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
Take my musings with a grain of salt (and refer to the more experienced/knowledgeable posters here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Stuck in the Matrix somewhere in Santa Clara CA
Posts: 7,739
|
Quote:
. Last edited by SystemicAnomaly : 11-12-2012 at 11:45 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| SystemicAnomaly |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by SystemicAnomaly |
|
|
#6 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,165
|
RHS. Loop for easier and more RHS.
Straight for more control and precision. Look at your serve, or better, your overhead. Overhead, if you're tentative, you shorten the loop, almost to a high volley stroke. If you're confident, full loop like a serve. Think of this. Your serve would be more precise if you laid your wrist back, held a JayBerger early trophy, and hit the ball. It would have less power. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|