|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 877
|
Quote:
Aside from that, high school tennis is not going to be the pinnacle for many if you limit varsity to six players. It will drive people away from the sport for the reasons I mentioned above. |
|
|
|
| sundaypunch |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by sundaypunch |
|
|
#42 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 143
|
"But this is not the reason they have these sports in high school. "
Most players get cut from high school teams, so what is the reason they have high school sports?
__________________
Director/Head-Coach Southern California Tennis Academy |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 877
|
|
|
|
| sundaypunch |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by sundaypunch |
|
|
#44 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 143
|
Yes. Quality will bring prestige, and prestige will bring more players to high school tennis. It will bring in more fans as well.
__________________
Director/Head-Coach Southern California Tennis Academy |
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 315
|
Decreasing the amount of varsity players will have only one effect in high school: less interest in the sport.
High school is only four years long. Not much time to practice to get to the top 6 in the school. If any kid knows that much, he/she will never join tennis because he/she knows that they will never get to play. No one in high school cares about the quality of a tennis match. The average student passing by can't always tell what is a good match and what isn't. If they can't play, they won't bother to sign up or try out. The fact that there are 12 varsity slots creates more interest, because there are more opportunities to play at all.
__________________
I am an unpredictable player. Even I surprise myself with some of the shots I make. |
|
|
| InspectorRacquet |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by InspectorRacquet |
|
|
#46 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 143
|
Having more varsity spots kills the quality of the sport, and that like of quality hurts tennis' reputation amongst other athletes.
Preparing for a varsity sport doesn't start in high school. It starts in elementary school. It is hard enough to have 6 good players, and 12 is impossible unless you are a private school and recruiting the entire city. If more players was the answer than golf would have bigger teams instead of the qualitative number they currently have-5. Golf knows how to market itself! Every golfer on varsity can flat out play. Varsity tennis?...not so much!
__________________
Director/Head-Coach Southern California Tennis Academy |
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 877
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| sundaypunch |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by sundaypunch |
|
|
#48 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 315
|
Quote:
1) Having more varsity spots does not kill the quality of the sport. I don't know how it does or how it ever will. It may affect the reputation (the "if you can make varsity..." stance) amongst other athletes, but athletes definitely aren't going to give up their high school sport for tennis. 2) Preparing for a varsity sport doesn't start in elementary school. No one starts a sport in elementary school thinking "I need to start training now if I'm going to make varsity in high school." That only comes into effect if the player is very good in middle school. Otherwise, most only think to train starting freshman year - but definitely not elementary school.
__________________
I am an unpredictable player. Even I surprise myself with some of the shots I make. |
|
|
|
| InspectorRacquet |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by InspectorRacquet |
|
|
#49 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,129
|
Sadly in today's world there are some parents who have their kid specialize in a sport early. Many schools in sports like basketball or baseball (there are others) don't have enough roster room to accept all the kids who try out. Not saying specializing so young is right. Just stating the obvious about participation levels vs. roster spots in H.S.
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
New User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 30
|
Limiting varsity spots will definitely not help the game whatsoever. The town next to where I live, South Brunswick, had a huge dilemma because of this last season. Their varsity team has been division champs for the past 3 years because none of their starters left. This coming season, it will be the same deal leaving no spots for any players on JV to move up. When the players on JV realized this, 3/4's of the team quit. There is no motivation to play especially when you realize you're not going to get a starting spot on Varsity. Why waste time making varsity and be benched the whole season when you could spend your time elsewhere to improve your game like playing tournaments?
__________________
2009 Babolat Pure Storm Ltd. GT 52/49 Topspin Cyberflash 16 / Gosen OG Sheep 17 |
|
|
| crazygamer2091 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by crazygamer2091 |
|
|
#51 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
__________________
Director/Head-Coach Southern California Tennis Academy |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 143
|
Hopefully I am just ahead of the curve. Without great matchups, you don't have great team tennis. Tennis is not deep enough to have so many spots, then the teams are out of balance. Balancing the depth will make it turn into a good team sport. Now all of the best kids go the same school. With 6 spots this won't happen nearly as much.
__________________
Director/Head-Coach Southern California Tennis Academy |
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: At Large
Posts: 2,147
|
I went to a private high school that was absolutely loaded with tennis players. Tennis had absolutely nothing with my decision to go there, nor any of my teammates. We went there for the quality of the academics and the culture/tradition/reputation of the school, it just so happened we had the best of the best tennis players in the area all in one place. Not just tennis players, but other sports too.
The only time I have ever known of players choosing a high school specifically for sports is in the case of sports like hockey or lacrosse where not every school has a team. |
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 218
|
...I agree with Mitch. Not that I claim expert credentials or anything. I do believe high school tennis is under utilized as a means of creating and supporting "more better, players." Keep pushing Mitch.
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
Frankly, I feel like you're being rather stubborn. You proposed an idea and almost everyone is against it. I think it's time you backed down a bit and take a closer look at what we've all been saying Mitch instead of downplaying it and continuing to try to prove your point to no prevail. Have a nice day.
__________________
2009 Babolat Pure Storm Ltd. GT 52/49 Topspin Cyberflash 16 / Gosen OG Sheep 17 |
|
|
|
| crazygamer2091 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by crazygamer2091 |
|
|
#56 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 256
|
This is actually a pretty good idea, it would be a lot more competitive, that's for sure.
|
|
|
| barringer97 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by barringer97 |
|
|
#57 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 877
|
This I have no problem with. I just think that his method for "improving" HS tennis would have the opposite effect of what he suggests.
|
|
|
| sundaypunch |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by sundaypunch |
|
|
#58 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
__________________
Director/Head-Coach Southern California Tennis Academy |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: At Large
Posts: 2,147
|
Sorry but I don't see tennis as a compelling reason for a family to move to another town/district (to attend a different public school), and for some families private school just isn't an option. So I don't see how this will spread out the talent among schools, if anything it would just reduce access to the sport.
Tennis is an expensive sport. The private schools and the public schools in wealthy neighborhoods will always have a bigger pool of players to draw from. Last edited by goran_ace : 11-15-2012 at 03:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,038
|
Quote:
Kidding. Just a sad bit of satire on division I college tennis today, haha. Best of luck w HS tennis. I played it. Loved it, even though most matches were a joke. The ones that were great, were great, and I wouldn't trade it for anything. Of course that was back in the 80s when life was simpler. |
|
|
|
| slice bh compliment |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by slice bh compliment |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|