|
|
#1 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 80
|
hi guys,
for years i've used ashaway crossfire 17, which is a 17g kevlar main with syn gut 16g. for the last couple years i've heard of all these different poly stings that claim to have tons of spin. i've finally decided to try a few of them out (hurricane pro tour 17, sspp 17g, tcs 16g, and few others and have yet to find anything that can really compare to the spin, durability, and tension maintenance of crossfire. i know that kevlar isn't great for your arm, but can anyone suggest to me a poly that has the spin potential (or close to it) of a kevlar hybrid setup? or does kevlar stand alone in the spin department. thanks, TF |
|
|
|
| tennisfreak73 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennisfreak73 |
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Coming from the Forten Thin Blend combo, I found Pro Line X to be the best, with the kevlar setup I would do 48/50, kevlar being lower, and with the X, I have it at 54/56, break it in, and let the tension drop off to around 48/50, and I get something similar, but more spin, a bit less power and similar control. The feel will be a bit different, but this setup is the closest I have gotten.
__________________
2012 Babolat Pure Drive Roddick Plus 2012 Babolat Pure Drive Roddick Standard |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 80
|
hey lanevo,
thanks for the info, however, i wasn't wondering about a hybrid setup with kevlar and a poly, rather just a poly that could stand up to the spin potential of a kevlar hybrid setup, similar to that of crossfire 17. in other words, i'm wondering if there is a poly that can give as much spin as kevlar. after reading my post again, i should have been more clear. thanks again for the info, it actually answers the question, somewhat. best, TF |
|
|
|
| tennisfreak73 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennisfreak73 |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 Babolat Pure Drive Roddick Plus 2012 Babolat Pure Drive Roddick Standard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,470
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 80
|
that's very interesting, pv. would you say the same in a hybrid poly setup with the poly as the main and syn gut as a cross? or does a full bed and hybrid (syn gut) generate relatively the same amount of spin?
|
|
|
|
| tennisfreak73 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennisfreak73 |
|
|
#7 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
|
Quote:
So us amateur players that use a string job for much longer will not enjoy the magic of poly that only lasts for a hour or two. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 80
|
|
|
|
|
| tennisfreak73 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennisfreak73 |
|
|
#9 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
|
Quote:
I am in the same boat as you I am trying to get away from kevlar, I have found quite a few polys that will produce great spin. But the problem is that after the first hour or so the poly loses its magic and control. And by the next day it will feel a little better and softer but it loses a lot of control. Where kevlar usually plays better the next day and will maintain its control for days. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
|
Exactly there is nothing like fresh poly I love it but not for long. Kevlar to me remains very consistent even though it loses tension quickly it does not become a trampoline like poly does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 80
|
tlm, I've used Kevlar for years so i know from experience that I get more spin and control from Kevlar, overtime. What I don't like
is the pounding my arm takes after using it for a few days. I'm going to stick with the poly, however it is frustrating, at times, to feel like you've found "the string" only to have a different one the next day. |
|
|
|
| tennisfreak73 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennisfreak73 |
|
|
#12 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 80
|
Tlm, very well said on all I the above!
|
|
|
|
| tennisfreak73 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennisfreak73 |
|
|
#13 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,810
|
Quote:
And as far as power goes, kevlar is about twice as stiff as a firm copoly like Alu Power, which means you'd get about 3 miles per hour more on an average shot with that copoly than you would with kevlar. That is quite a lot, about the same difference as between copoly and natural gut. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
|
Quote:
You may be right about the spin data on kevlar, that came from some other posters that said that it has been proven in labs that poly produces much more spin than kevlar. In my real life hitting experience I have found kevlar to produce as much if not more spin than poly does. I believe it is the added power that poly gives is what makes some think that it is producing more spin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 80
|
|
|
|
|
| tennisfreak73 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennisfreak73 |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,470
|
Quote:
There is already a thread on this topic actually. For a high swing speed, poly will return more energy into the ball in the form of spin than Kevlar. As I mentioned in that thread, Agassi who used Kevlar for many many years said something to the effect that they need to let everyone know about poly or get rid of it because it produces so much spin per stroke. Sampras, upon trying it in retirement, said that it was like cheating due to the shots he could hit. Jim Courier at first didn't like poly BECAUSE it produced too much spin and he couldn't hit flat enough. Regardless, if you feel Kevlar produces more spin, then use Kevlar. The likely reason you are getting the impression of greater spin is because Kevlar lets you swing as hard as you want at the ball, more or less. Poly, on the other hand, has more power, but greater elasticity, so if you have a less spin-generating stroke, then your impression will be that Kevlar is better for spin. I'm not going to argue why an entire industry has shifted if you personally like the spin of Kevlar. Last edited by pvaudio : 11-15-2012 at 04:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
G.O.A.T.
|
I used Ashaway 16/ALU Rough for about 2 1/2 years after switching away from a full bed of ALU Rough due to string breakage.
Currently using BBO/ALU Rough. It took some getting used to, but I like the Jolly Rig II a bit better, maybe? OK, I really like the Kevlar, but it broke all my racquets. But the BBO/ALU is really good too. Just different. And needs to be strung MUCH looser. J
__________________
I'm your huckleberry... |
|
|
|
| J011yroger |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by J011yroger |
|
|
#19 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
|
Quote:
I also string any of these polys at a minimum of 65 lbs. Many here will say I am crazy for using that high of tension but I have no problem with it and anything less makes the control not last as long. Right now I am using gamma powerplay 18 gauge kevlar at 58lbs. with yonex poly tour spin cross at 63lbs. This set up is tremendous but like you I want to get away from kevlar to prevent injuries. If I find a great poly that does what I want I will let you know, but so far I have found some that do exactly what I want but only for the first day. Still searching and maybe I just need 3 rackets instead of 2 and string more often. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
|
Quote:
Again agassi talking about poly has little to do with amateur players because we do not use a fresh string job every half hour. I like poly better than anything for the first hour or so, but it changes a lot after that. So ya if i had at new string job to use as often as I wanted to poly would be unbeatable. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|