|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 646
|
According to RSI, NRG17 rates 190 and Forten Sweet 17 rates 194 in stiffness. I am going for max comfort and thought to try some multis but it seems with the such a small difference that NRG at 58 wouldn't be any more comfortable than FS at 50.
Anyone have an opinion on whether these numbers hold true or does the multi still play softer? If the difference is minimal I'll stick with the $3 Forten!! |
|
|
|
| keithfival |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by keithfival |
|
|
#2 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 14,833
|
Only way to know for sure is to try it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,944
|
NRG is a soft string, but it seems to string up fairly tight. Haven't used Forten Sweet in a while, and wouldn't guess as to which of your choices would produce the most power, but as far as stringbed stiffness, I'd bet on the NRG at 58 being the tightest.
|
|
|
|
| Steve Huff |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Steve Huff |
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Desert
Posts: 2,996
|
Forten Sweet does not play as stiff as the numbers would lead you to believe.
It's a good guideline, but high test stiffness does not always mean harsh nor does a low number always mean comfortable. Remember, all RSI tests are done on a single string @62 lbs.
__________________
Neos 1000, Eagnas Combo 810(home),Prince 5000(work) Member USRSA |
|
|
|
| fortun8son |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by fortun8son |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|