|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,663
|
Quote:
Connors, again, had lower success on first serve (48%) than on second (55%). We see that in a lot of his matches. It was true also when he lost to Newk in Australia. These stats were simply not available at the time, and I wonder what, if anything, Connors would have done if he or someone in his circle had realized that he had matches like this, in which his first serve was not working for him the way it should. On this board we see such numbers and we don't necessarily know the reason that someone's numbers might turn out this way, but I'm sure that experts and analysts of the time would have had some ideas about it. Ashe's numbers look solid: 70% on first serve and 54% on second. Last edited by krosero : 11-24-2012 at 08:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,663
|
Nadal_Power, a couple of other observations about your stats.
Connors made most of his successful returns with his forehand -- just slightly more than he made with his backhand. (And that was true in each of the sets individually -- except the third set.) That might mean that his FH return was better than his BH return, though we can't say that without a breakdown of his return errors by wing. Perhaps Ashe served more often to his FH wing, which would have allowed Connors to amass a large number of successful FH returns. Ashe's return numbers are simpler: a solid majority of his successful returns were backhands. He was known for a great backhand, so no surprise there. However, as above, there's always the possibility that these numbers result from the direction that the server was choosing. That is, Connors may have been serving more often to the BH. In the third set Connors had only 2 chances to break Ashe, while Ashe had 9 chances. Yet Connors took the set, because he converted both his chances, while managing to fight off nearly all the break points he faced. I saw no discrepancies with my stats, except that I have 28 service winners of every kind by Connors. I counted 6 in the opening set: 3 in Jimmy's first service game, two more in his second and one more in his last. Question: do your unforced errors include the double-faults? |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 480
|
I probably should but no, double faults are not in unforced errors
In his second service game of first set Jimmy made only one service winner (3rd point of the game), other 7 services Arthur returned well Yeah, 3rd set was a real steal, Jimmy was again below 50% on his first serve |
|
|
|
| Nadal_Power |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Nadal_Power |
|
|
#44 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,663
|
Quote:
I think double-faults are included in UE totals today, but that has not always been true. I was just curious how you were doing it. So 41 unforced errors by Connors, compared to only 23 by Ashe. Has to be considered one of the keys to the match, glad you did that stat. One other question about your UE, do you ever judge a service return as unforced? Or do you just list all failed returns as service winners? Basically what I'm asking is whether your totals for UE and service winners are entirely separate, or whether there's some overlap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 480
|
Quote:
No, they are just service winners and not UE.. I saw a lot of bad easy returns in this and in 1981. final but I just put them in service winners and not in unforced errors I have stats for 1999. final too, maybe I can post them in thread about that match |
|
|
|
|
| Nadal_Power |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Nadal_Power |
|
|
#46 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,663
|
Quote:
Ashe's serves by contrast were more forcing; and he was coming in behind all of them. So I'm guessing none of Connors' return errors are going to be UE's. '99 final is here: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=185518 You referring to the '81 Wimbledon final? Do you have a complete copy? The BBC copy that everyone has is incomplete, with service faults cut out: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=214455. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 18,939
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,710
|
The 1981 Wimbledon semi is one of the most exhilarating matches ever played at Wimbledon and a true hommage to the greatness of both players
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70´s and 80´s" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 480
|
Quote:
O.k, maybe today I will post stats in that thread.. hope they will be o.k No I don't have it m8 and I read that thread about problems with first serves cut out.. I just done stats with few sources I found, but not all points are recorded and many first serves are out.. its so frustrating Last edited by Nadal_Power : 11-30-2012 at 02:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| Nadal_Power |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Nadal_Power |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|