• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > General Pro Player Discussion
Reload this Page Murray has a good chance to become #1 next year
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 1 of 6 1 23 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2012, 12:55 PM   #1
papertank
Professional
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 813
Default Murray has a good chance to become #1 next year

Murray had a pretty bad first half of the year this year. Besides the semis of the AO and the Miami final, he did hardly anything. Bad showing at IW, awful clay season. On the other hand, he did very well in the second half of the year. He has a perfect window of opportunity to take the #1 ranking, at least for a few weeks, in the first half of next year. If he can win either the AO or Wimbledon, he will have points for 2 slams as well as the Olympic gold. Combine that with better showings at the first few Masters and there is hardly any way he can't be #1.
__________________
Federer in 2
papertank is offline   Reply With Quote
papertank
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by papertank
Old 12-02-2012, 12:55 PM   #2
Sabratha
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,475
Default

I'm sure he will achieve the #1 ranking next year some time, probably during May, I'd say.
Sabratha is online now   Reply With Quote
Sabratha
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Sabratha
Old 12-02-2012, 01:00 PM   #3
tennis_pro
G.O.A.T.
 
tennis_pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,644
Default

Murray won't be ranked first even if he ties his career-best results in most of the tournaments. Why? Cause at best he'll be even with Djokovic on hard courts (talking about ranking points here/results) but fall behind on clay.

Or let's give it a second look. Murray is currently at 8000 points, Djokovic at almost 13000 which is a 5.000 difference. How on earth is Murray going to make up so much ground?
__________________
"By the Nalbandian logic, I could beat Federer when I'm "in form". Nalbandian is only a threat to linesmen." - pvaudio
tennis_pro is offline   Reply With Quote
tennis_pro
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tennis_pro
Old 12-02-2012, 01:03 PM   #4
Clarky21
G.O.A.T.
 
Clarky21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 10,386
Default

I doubt it. I think Cvac is going to pick up a lot of the points he dropped this year again. Especially during clay season.
__________________
"Hopefully the Church of Fed will have mercy on my soul". - Namelessone
"We are in the Fed warehouse(known as Nadal haters united)". - Namelessone

Last edited by Clarky21 : 12-02-2012 at 01:30 PM.
Clarky21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Clarky21
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Clarky21
Old 12-02-2012, 01:04 PM   #5
The Bawss
Hall Of Fame
 
The Bawss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lyon, France.
Posts: 2,714
Default

Oh my god the crazy started early for next season.
The Bawss is online now   Reply With Quote
The Bawss
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by The Bawss
Old 12-02-2012, 01:06 PM   #6
batz
G.O.A.T.
 
batz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_pro View Post
Murray won't be ranked first even if he ties his career-best results in most of the tournaments. Why? Cause at best he'll be even with Djokovic on hard courts (talking about ranking points here/results) but fall behind on clay.

Or let's give it a second look. Murray is currently at 8000 points, Djokovic at almost 13000 which is a 5.000 difference. How on earth is Murray going to make up so much ground?
There's the concept of 'swing' mate. Let's say Murray wins the AO (he won't IMO but let's imagine he does), beating Noel in the semis. That 5000 point gap is down to 2600 - and we're only in January. Let's say Murray then wins IW - the gap is down to 1400.

Not saying it's going to happen - but it's not like it couldn't happen.
__________________
"If Murray were always good, he would not be so good." MixieP - Philosopher
batz is online now   Reply With Quote
batz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by batz
Old 12-02-2012, 01:09 PM   #7
NadalAgassi
Legend
 
NadalAgassi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_pro View Post
Murray won't be ranked first even if he ties his career-best results in most of the tournaments. Why? Cause at best he'll be even with Djokovic on hard courts (talking about ranking points here/results) but fall behind on clay.

Or let's give it a second look. Murray is currently at 8000 points, Djokovic at almost 13000 which is a 5.000 difference. How on earth is Murray going to make up so much ground?
Murray can outperform Djokovic on grass, and arguably should. For Murray to end the year #1 i think he would have to win both Wimbledon and the U.S Open though (either that or the Australian and one of Wimbledon or the U.S Open), have a 2011 like clay season, and play consistenty and keep winning throughout the year. Otherwise it will be Djokovic.

Nadal has a chance if he is able to come back quickly enough to have great results on hard courts from January-March which seems unlikely. His case he probably has to win both the French and Wimbledon to have a chance (either that or the French and a hard court slam but that being less likely), since poor results post U.S Open are predictable.

Djokovic is the most likely year end #1 but I cant believe he is a mortal lock. He isnt that dominant.
__________________
TMF on Jan. 2011- Serena is washed up for good, TMF in Oct. 2009- Nadal has won his final slam, TMF in 2011- Woz will beat Serena at U.S Open
NadalAgassi is offline   Reply With Quote
NadalAgassi
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NadalAgassi
Old 12-02-2012, 01:10 PM   #8
cork_screw
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,965
Default

Murray has solved Djokovic and Fed, but I would like to see what happens when he runs into the spanish bull in the semis or the finals. If he can beat him just half of the time he encounters him in slam or big masters events, I will say that murray will be #1. But it might not happen this year. Let's see how the bull's knees are, so far that's his achilies heel and it's the only thing that is defeating him at the moment.
cork_screw is offline   Reply With Quote
cork_screw
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by cork_screw
Old 12-02-2012, 01:11 PM   #9
RF20Lennon
Hall Of Fame
 
RF20Lennon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,570
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cork_screw View Post
Murray has solved Djokovic and Fed, but I would like to see what happens when he runs into the spanish bull in the semis or the finals.
I LOL'ed he's solved them so easily that he cant win a final despite holding 5 MP's and loses 7-6 6-2 to the other
__________________
Intellectuals solve problems, Geniuses prevent them
RAFA2005RG- "If he (Rafa) lost Roland Garros it would be like death."
RF20Lennon is offline   Reply With Quote
RF20Lennon
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by RF20Lennon
Old 12-02-2012, 01:13 PM   #10
tennis_pro
G.O.A.T.
 
tennis_pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by batz View Post
There's the concept of 'swing' mate. Let's say Murray wins the AO (he won't IMO but let's imagine he does), beating Noel in the semis. That 5000 point gap is down to 2600 - and we're only in January. Let's say Murray then wins IW - the gap is down to 1400.

Not saying it's going to happen - but it's not like it couldn't happen.
Theoretically I could be ranked no 1 by June 2013 if I won everything till then while the top 10 are plagued with injuries.

Now let me flip flop your post - what if Djokovic defended his AO crown, then regained his Dubai and Indian Wells titles while Murray, say, loses a heartbreaking AO final to Novak and his confidence bar reaches 0 %. Instead of a 5000 point difference we could see something like a 7.000-8000 gap.

During all those years stranger things have happened, f.e. looking at the rankings in May 2009 I would never have guessed that Fed was going to regain the no 1 spot in less than 2 months. And vice versa in mid 2010. But both Fed and Nads have proved over the years that they can sustain GOAT level long enough to be ranked no 1 while Murray plays in patches.
__________________
"By the Nalbandian logic, I could beat Federer when I'm "in form". Nalbandian is only a threat to linesmen." - pvaudio
tennis_pro is offline   Reply With Quote
tennis_pro
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tennis_pro
Old 12-02-2012, 01:14 PM   #11
NadalAgassi
Legend
 
NadalAgassi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,577
Default

I still see Murray as the underdog to Nadal in any non indoor match, Djokovic in any non grass match, and Federer in any major event (anything bigger than Masters match) for the time being. He is making progress but hasnt really gained the upper hand in any of those matchups yet. That could change in 2013 depending on how much he keeps progressing.
__________________
TMF on Jan. 2011- Serena is washed up for good, TMF in Oct. 2009- Nadal has won his final slam, TMF in 2011- Woz will beat Serena at U.S Open
NadalAgassi is offline   Reply With Quote
NadalAgassi
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NadalAgassi
Old 12-02-2012, 01:14 PM   #12
Sabratha
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,475
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_pro View Post
Murray won't be ranked first even if he ties his career-best results in most of the tournaments. Why? Cause at best he'll be even with Djokovic on hard courts (talking about ranking points here/results) but fall behind on clay.

Or let's give it a second look. Murray is currently at 8000 points, Djokovic at almost 13000 which is a 5.000 difference. How on earth is Murray going to make up so much ground?
Djokovic loses in the QF of the Australian Open, Murray wins.
Djokovic - 11,280
Murray - 9,280

Murray wins Dubai.
Djokovic - 11,280
Murray - 9,480

Murray wins Indian Wells while Djokovic makes the SF.
Djokovic - 11,280
Murray - 10,470

Murray makes the QF of Rome while Djokovic withdraws.
Djokovic - 10,680
Murray - 10,660

Murray makes the SF at Roland Garros while Djokovic loses in the SF.
Murray - 11,020
Djokovic - 9,840.
Sabratha is online now   Reply With Quote
Sabratha
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Sabratha
Old 12-02-2012, 01:18 PM   #13
tennis_pro
G.O.A.T.
 
tennis_pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
Djokovic loses in the QF of the Australian Open, Murray wins.
Djokovic - 11,280
Murray - 9,280
Loses to whom? Is it Berdych? Tsonga? Or maybe Tipsarevic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
Murray wins Dubai.
Djokovic - 11,280
Murray - 9,480
Djokovic is not playing? I'd think if Djokovic lost in the QF in AO he would love to make it up with a couple of wins in Dubai or whichever tournament he plays next.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
Murray wins Indian Wells while Djokovic makes the SF.
Djokovic - 11,280
Murray - 10,470
Murray has never won there. Isner for another upset?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
Murray makes the QF of Rome while Djokovic withdraws.
Djokovic - 10,680
Murray - 10,660
Novak withdraws again? This is starting to sound like wishful thinking.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
Murray makes the SF at Roland Garros while Djokovic loses in the SF.
Murray - 11,020
Djokovic - 9,840.
What's the difference between "makes the SF" and "loses in the SF"? So you assume that Murray will reach his first FO final next year?
__________________
"By the Nalbandian logic, I could beat Federer when I'm "in form". Nalbandian is only a threat to linesmen." - pvaudio
tennis_pro is offline   Reply With Quote
tennis_pro
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tennis_pro
Old 12-02-2012, 01:21 PM   #14
tennis_pro
G.O.A.T.
 
tennis_pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NadalAgassi View Post
I still see Murray as the underdog to Nadal in any non indoor match, Djokovic in any non grass match, and Federer in any major event (anything bigger than Masters match) for the time being. He is making progress but hasnt really gained the upper hand in any of those matchups yet. That could change in 2013 depending on how much he keeps progressing.
I agree. But damn, the guy hits 26 years old in May. How much longer is he going to progress? Until he's 35?
__________________
"By the Nalbandian logic, I could beat Federer when I'm "in form". Nalbandian is only a threat to linesmen." - pvaudio
tennis_pro is offline   Reply With Quote
tennis_pro
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tennis_pro
Old 12-02-2012, 01:25 PM   #15
batz
G.O.A.T.
 
batz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_pro View Post
Theoretically I could be ranked no 1 by June 2013 if I won everything till then while the top 10 are plagued with injuries.

Now let me flip flop your post - what if Djokovic defended his AO crown, then regained his Dubai and Indian Wells titles while Murray, say, loses a heartbreaking AO final to Novak and his confidence bar reaches 0 %. Instead of a 5000 point difference we could see something like a 7.000-8000 gap.

During all those years stranger things have happened, f.e. looking at the rankings in May 2009 I would never have guessed that Fed was going to regain the no 1 spot in less than 2 months. And vice versa in mid 2010. But both Fed and Nads have proved over the years that they can sustain GOAT level long enough to be ranked no 1 while Murray plays in patches.
Theoretically you couldn't, because you don't have the ranking and wouldn't get the wildcards. That aside, I don't see how Murray winning AO and IW is comparable to you winning every tournament until next June and the rest of the top 10 being injured.

You asked how a 5000 point gap could be reduced and I showed you. You now seem to be arguing about a point I haven't made - that Murray will make number 1 next year. I have no idea whether he will or not - but I agree he will need to be more consistent outside of the slams if he is to do so.

He needs to combine his 09/10 non slam consistency with his 11/12 slam consistency - if that happens; then he has a genuine shot.
__________________
"If Murray were always good, he would not be so good." MixieP - Philosopher

Last edited by batz : 12-02-2012 at 01:28 PM.
batz is online now   Reply With Quote
batz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by batz
Old 12-02-2012, 01:28 PM   #16
6-1 6-3 6-0
Hall Of Fame
 
6-1 6-3 6-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,134
Default

Meanwhile, Nadal will be snatching all the slams...
6-1 6-3 6-0 is offline   Reply With Quote
6-1 6-3 6-0
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by 6-1 6-3 6-0
Old 12-02-2012, 01:37 PM   #17
Towser83
Legend
 
Towser83's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
Djokovic loses in the QF of the Australian Open, Murray wins.
Djokovic - 11,280
Murray - 9,280

Murray wins Dubai.
Djokovic - 11,280
Murray - 9,480

Murray wins Indian Wells while Djokovic makes the SF.
Djokovic - 11,280
Murray - 10,470

Murray makes the QF of Rome while Djokovic withdraws.
Djokovic - 10,680
Murray - 10,660

Murray makes the SF at Roland Garros while Djokovic loses in the SF.
Murray - 11,020
Djokovic - 9,840.
This all seems like quite a stretch. Especially love the "Withdraws from Rome" part. I mean it could happen but it's still odds against it.

The big thing for Murray is, like with Federer last year, can Murray avoid a 2 an rivallry? If he is going up against Novak then he could be out of luck. But if Nadalor Federer can rob Novak of some titles, Murray could edge a 3 way split. Let's say he wins Wimledon and is holding 2 slams, well if Djokovic defends Australia and adds RG then Murray might still be chasing number one. However if the other 2 slams are split between Djokovic and Nadal/Federer or Djokovic fails to win a slam, then Murray's chances improve a lot.
__________________
Federer, Djokovic, Delpo fan (also like Nalbandian, Dimitrov, Tsonga)
Towser83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Towser83
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Towser83
Old 12-02-2012, 01:38 PM   #18
Sabratha
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,475
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_pro View Post
Loses to whom? Is it Berdych? Tsonga? Or maybe Tipsarevic?
Del Potro could pull through.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_pro View Post
Djokovic is not playing? I'd think if Djokovic lost in the QF in AO he would love to make it up with a couple of wins in Dubai or whichever tournament he plays next.
He may need an impartial break to regroup his thoughts.



Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_pro View Post
Murray has never won there. Isner for another upset?
If Murray wins the AO, don't you think he will actually try to win the forthcoming tournaments?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_pro View Post
Novak withdraws again? This is starting to sound like wishful thinking.
Djokovic withdraws a lot, ya know?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_pro View Post
What's the difference between "makes the SF" and "loses in the SF"? So you assume that Murray will reach his first FO final next year?
They're going to both lose in the SF.
Sabratha is online now   Reply With Quote
Sabratha
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Sabratha
Old 12-02-2012, 01:45 PM   #19
jaggy
Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 6,693
Default

He only wins when its windy
jaggy is offline   Reply With Quote
jaggy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jaggy
Old 12-02-2012, 01:46 PM   #20
tennis_pro
G.O.A.T.
 
tennis_pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
Del Potro could pull through.
What if Del Potro isn't drawn with Djokovic in one quarter?

First, Del Potro has to land in Djokovic's section. Then at the same time Del Potro has to show up in GOATmode while Djokovic in CRAPmode and even there I would favor Novak to win in 5.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
He may need an impartial break to regroup his thoughts.
Lawl. The toughest player mentally on tour will need a break to regroup his thoughts? Really? Unless you mean that one of Djokovic's family members is going to die next year...other than that - not happening.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
If Murray wins the AO, don't you think he will actually try to win the forthcoming tournaments?
Pretty much like everyone else...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
Djokovic withdraws a lot, ya know?
Djokovic would have to break a leg to not show up in Rome.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabratha View Post
They're going to both lose in the SF.
If this means that Federer beats Murray in the SF while Nadal beats Djokovic in the SF, I take it!
__________________
"By the Nalbandian logic, I could beat Federer when I'm "in form". Nalbandian is only a threat to linesmen." - pvaudio
tennis_pro is offline   Reply With Quote
tennis_pro
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tennis_pro
Reply
Page 1 of 6 1 23 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > General Pro Player Discussion
Reload this Page Murray has a good chance to become #1 next year

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:18 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse