• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Wilson new Blade 98
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 1 of 4 1 23 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2012, 11:07 AM   #1
P4p4r4zzo
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2
Default Wilson new Blade 98

I have noticed that the weight in the 16x19 and the 18x20 new Wilson Blade 98 are quite different. Is that an error in the information or the weight in those two rackets are actually THAT DIFFERENT??
P4p4r4zzo is offline   Reply With Quote
P4p4r4zzo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by P4p4r4zzo
Old 12-03-2012, 11:30 AM   #2
vetinari
New User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
Default

I don't know about the blades, but I don't think it's that unusual. Look at the IG speeds (18x20 v 16x19): different lengths, different stiffness, different beam widths, different weights.
vetinari is offline   Reply With Quote
vetinari
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by vetinari
Old 12-03-2012, 12:28 PM   #3
eleventeenth street
Semi-Pro
 
eleventeenth street's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 483
Default

TW's specs are an average of several racquets. the difference in weight is probably due to the less than stellar quality control of wilson's frames. i think officially, they are supposed to weigh the same
eleventeenth street is offline   Reply With Quote
eleventeenth street
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by eleventeenth street
Old 12-03-2012, 02:11 PM   #4
vetinari
New User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
Default

Wilson QC is that bad?
vetinari is offline   Reply With Quote
vetinari
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by vetinari
Old 12-03-2012, 02:31 PM   #5
eleventeenth street
Semi-Pro
 
eleventeenth street's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vetinari View Post
Wilson QC is that bad?
wilson is probably the worst in terms of quality control
eleventeenth street is offline   Reply With Quote
eleventeenth street
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by eleventeenth street
Old 12-03-2012, 02:41 PM   #6
hersito
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 265
Default

It's been talk a few times, probably grommet and strings make the small difference.
hersito is offline   Reply With Quote
hersito
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by hersito
Old 12-06-2012, 01:55 AM   #7
barry
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,205
Default

I just received my Blade 98 (16x19) unstrung it weighed 10.7 ounces; strung 11.2 (just like TW says); and changing the grip to a pro hybrid it is 11.4 before the over grip. So my racket was spot on. It is an L5 (4 5/ and only complaint was the grip shipped with the racket was soft and mushy. I like either leather or the older Pro Hybrid grips (more feedback).

I string 1 piece and with most Blade frames the mains end at the bottom of the racket and you string the crosses from bottom to top. With the new Blade the mains ends at the top and crosses go down the racket. Not bad to string, but a little different than the BLX 98 (18x20) and the six.one 95 series.

So far the racket swings nice, have a match today. I have been using the Blade 98 (18x20) series for a couple of years, and find them easy on the joints with good power and control.

Last edited by barry : 12-06-2012 at 02:02 AM.
barry is offline   Reply With Quote
barry
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by barry
Old 12-06-2012, 05:30 AM   #8
Power Player
G.O.A.T.
 
Power Player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,562
Default

Barry, great info thanks!

Few questions -

It looks like the Pro Hybrid adds no extra weight..is this correct? I definitely want to switch back to a pro hybrid.

I string 2 piece. Safe to assume nothing has changed there if so?
__________________
🐐ing
Power Player is offline   Reply With Quote
Power Player
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Power Player
Old 12-06-2012, 10:08 AM   #9
donnayblack99
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: On the court
Posts: 41
Default Blade 93 (2013)

Just ordered mine today! Should be getting 3 "Darth Vaders" in the mail next week. All strung with Big Hitter Black 17g @ 53 lbs.

This stick will be the new PS 85. It has immense plow thru, power, yet plush on the arm like a VOLK PB 10or Becker DC London Tour. An instant classic. I hear from my Wilson contact that this will be Pete's new stick. He was playing with a Babolat PST 95 but wanted more weight... Wilson supposedly changed their BLX design with him in mind. Pete played in Philly last month and was using a blacked out 93 sq inch, tight patterned, Blade-look a like stick.

I'm looking for pics to back this claim up...
__________________
Volkl PB 10 w/ Cyclone 18g@50 lbs. 5.5 NTRP... NCAA DIV 1 Singles
donnayblack99 is offline   Reply With Quote
donnayblack99
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by donnayblack99
Old 12-06-2012, 10:19 AM   #10
Power Player
G.O.A.T.
 
Power Player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,562
Default

wow..that is really awesome if so. Pete back to Wilson - as it should be.
__________________
🐐ing
Power Player is offline   Reply With Quote
Power Player
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Power Player
Old 12-06-2012, 11:15 AM   #11
klementine79
Hall Of Fame
 
klementine79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DcMdVa
Posts: 3,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by donnayblack99 View Post
Just ordered mine today! Should be getting 3 "Darth Vaders" in the mail next week. All strung with Big Hitter Black 17g @ 53 lbs.

This stick will be the new PS 85. It has immense plow thru, power, yet plush on the arm like a VOLK PB 10or Becker DC London Tour. An instant classic. I hear from my Wilson contact that this will be Pete's new stick. He was playing with a Babolat PST 95 but wanted more weight... Wilson supposedly changed their BLX design with him in mind. Pete played in Philly last month and was using a blacked out 93 sq inch, tight patterned, Blade-look a like stick.

I'm looking for pics to back this claim up...
Pics would be nice. Can't find any.

Pete was/is playing with a blacked out PureStorm, with a 98sq.in. head size, a 16x20 pattern and weighted exactly like his old ps85s, balanced even as well. The PstLtd is indeed a 95, 18x20, but it's not the frame Pete was/is rockin'.

Just can't see Pete switchin' to an 18x20 pattern at this point. The Blade98, 16x19, maybe.
__________________
Tommy Haasian GOATmode*
* = FedK (tm)
klementine79 is offline   Reply With Quote
klementine79
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by klementine79
Old 12-06-2012, 01:16 PM   #12
YesTennis
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 393
Default

Waiting for some feedback on the new Blade 16X19. The specs look great, but was somewhat surprised by the relatively cool response from the play testers. Do you think people will like the higher SW of this racquet(for plow) or do you think it will be too much, as people seemed to complain about with the Head YT/Ig Radical Pro?
YesTennis is offline   Reply With Quote
YesTennis
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by YesTennis
Old 12-06-2012, 01:29 PM   #13
Power Player
G.O.A.T.
 
Power Player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,562
Default

I honestly think the Blade is meant to be an 18x20. The 16x19 was made by Wilson probably since it is so popular they could make two versions and some people asked for a 16x19 pattern. It is still a relatively light stick and as a result, the spin with an 18x20 pattern is very high due to racquet head speed.

It trumps the Radical Pro by far for me. Far easier to swing and it's just a lighter stick in general. The YT Rad Pro really grabbed me when I first got it, but the SW was 345 (my blades are 331) and bugged my shoulder.
__________________
🐐ing
Power Player is offline   Reply With Quote
Power Player
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Power Player
Old 12-06-2012, 01:59 PM   #14
thecrusher956
Rookie
 
thecrusher956's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 183
Default

For someone coming from Babolat Aero Storm Tour, would the Blades swing weight make up for the slightly dropped regular weight?
__________________
Vamos.
thecrusher956 is offline   Reply With Quote
thecrusher956
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by thecrusher956
Old 12-06-2012, 02:19 PM   #15
barry
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Player View Post
Barry, great info thanks!

Few questions -

It looks like the Pro Hybrid adds no extra weight..is this correct? I definitely want to switch back to a pro hybrid.

I string 2 piece. Safe to assume nothing has changed there if so?
The pro hybrid added .2 of an ounce, but 11.4 is the same as the old BLX 98 (18x20)
Skip 7 & 9 on the old BLX blade 98 (18x20). The 16x19 skip 8t and 8h. The string is more open at the throat.
barry is offline   Reply With Quote
barry
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by barry
Old 12-06-2012, 02:28 PM   #16
barry
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YesTennis View Post
Waiting for some feedback on the new Blade 16X19. The specs look great, but was somewhat surprised by the relatively cool response from the play testers. Do you think people will like the higher SW of this racquet(for plow) or do you think it will be too much, as people seemed to complain about with the Head YT/Ig Radical Pro?
I have been playing with the Blade 98 (18 x 20) for the last couple of year. I can honestly say the (16x19) has a lot more pop. Serves were much better with the new model, gained about 10 MPH. Only disappointment with the racket was volleying did not seem as sharp. Will give it a few more matches before deciding. Also the (16x19) seems a little stiffer, but no vibrations.
We played on clay today (2 ½ hours) and the courts were wet so difficult to compare ground strokes. This weekend plan a full workout practice session on hard courts.
The racket is one of the better looking Wilson frames, Black and Silver.
barry is offline   Reply With Quote
barry
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by barry
Old 12-06-2012, 02:35 PM   #17
YesTennis
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 393
Default

Thanks PP and Barry. Much appreciated. Interesting that the SW difference of 331 to 345 was so significant.
YesTennis is offline   Reply With Quote
YesTennis
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by YesTennis
Old 12-06-2012, 05:39 PM   #18
tlimster
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 125
Default Compare new Blades against H22 or H19

Has anyone tried the new 98 versus the H22 or H19? I am curious mainly because the new Blade 98 18x20 looks to get good marks on TW for arm friendliness, and the H22 has caused some people with arm issues some tenderness.
tlimster is offline   Reply With Quote
tlimster
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tlimster
Old 12-08-2012, 02:02 PM   #19
gplracer
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 776
Default

My son hit with the 16x19 version and he likes it. The problem is that we are gun shy because he broke all of his blade 98 rackets near the grip.
__________________
Wilson 6.1 95
gplracer is offline   Reply With Quote
gplracer
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by gplracer
Old 12-09-2012, 08:06 AM   #20
ALC
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 5
Default

Can anyone compare the Prince Rebel 98 to the new Blade 98 16x19? I like the Rebel after demo but haven't had the chance to hit the new blade yet. I'm a 3.5-4.0 player, mostly flat hitter trying to gain some spin. Ive had some elbow issues so i like the feel of the Rebel. Should I wait to demo the new blade before I take the plunge?
ALC is offline   Reply With Quote
ALC
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ALC
Reply
Page 1 of 4 1 23 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Wilson new Blade 98

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse