|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
New User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2
|
I have noticed that the weight in the 16x19 and the 18x20 new Wilson Blade 98 are quite different. Is that an error in the information or the weight in those two rackets are actually THAT DIFFERENT??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
|
I don't know about the blades, but I don't think it's that unusual. Look at the IG speeds (18x20 v 16x19): different lengths, different stiffness, different beam widths, different weights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 483
|
TW's specs are an average of several racquets. the difference in weight is probably due to the less than stellar quality control of wilson's frames. i think officially, they are supposed to weigh the same
|
|
|
|
| eleventeenth street |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by eleventeenth street |
|
|
#4 |
|
New User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
|
Wilson QC is that bad?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 483
|
|
|
|
|
| eleventeenth street |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by eleventeenth street |
|
|
#6 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 265
|
It's been talk a few times, probably grommet and strings make the small difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,205
|
I just received my Blade 98 (16x19) unstrung it weighed 10.7 ounces; strung 11.2 (just like TW says); and changing the grip to a pro hybrid it is 11.4 before the over grip. So my racket was spot on. It is an L5 (4 5/
I string 1 piece and with most Blade frames the mains end at the bottom of the racket and you string the crosses from bottom to top. With the new Blade the mains ends at the top and crosses go down the racket. Not bad to string, but a little different than the BLX 98 (18x20) and the six.one 95 series. So far the racket swings nice, have a match today. I have been using the Blade 98 (18x20) series for a couple of years, and find them easy on the joints with good power and control. Last edited by barry : 12-06-2012 at 02:02 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,562
|
Barry, great info thanks!
Few questions - It looks like the Pro Hybrid adds no extra weight..is this correct? I definitely want to switch back to a pro hybrid. I string 2 piece. Safe to assume nothing has changed there if so?
__________________
🐐ing |
|
|
|
| Power Player |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Power Player |
|
|
#9 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: On the court
Posts: 41
|
Just ordered mine today! Should be getting 3 "Darth Vaders" in the mail next week. All strung with Big Hitter Black 17g @ 53 lbs.
This stick will be the new PS 85. It has immense plow thru, power, yet plush on the arm like a VOLK PB 10or Becker DC London Tour. An instant classic. I hear from my Wilson contact that this will be Pete's new stick. He was playing with a Babolat PST 95 but wanted more weight... Wilson supposedly changed their BLX design with him in mind. Pete played in Philly last month and was using a blacked out 93 sq inch, tight patterned, Blade-look a like stick. I'm looking for pics to back this claim up...
__________________
Volkl PB 10 w/ Cyclone 18g@50 lbs. 5.5 NTRP... NCAA DIV 1 Singles |
|
|
|
| donnayblack99 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by donnayblack99 |
|
|
#10 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,562
|
wow..that is really awesome if so. Pete back to Wilson - as it should be.
__________________
🐐ing |
|
|
|
| Power Player |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Power Player |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DcMdVa
Posts: 3,651
|
Quote:
Pete was/is playing with a blacked out PureStorm, with a 98sq.in. head size, a 16x20 pattern and weighted exactly like his old ps85s, balanced even as well. The PstLtd is indeed a 95, 18x20, but it's not the frame Pete was/is rockin'. Just can't see Pete switchin' to an 18x20 pattern at this point. The Blade98, 16x19, maybe.
__________________
Tommy Haasian GOATmode* * = FedK (tm) |
|
|
|
|
| klementine79 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by klementine79 |
|
|
#12 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 393
|
Waiting for some feedback on the new Blade 16X19. The specs look great, but was somewhat surprised by the relatively cool response from the play testers. Do you think people will like the higher SW of this racquet(for plow) or do you think it will be too much, as people seemed to complain about with the Head YT/Ig Radical Pro?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,562
|
I honestly think the Blade is meant to be an 18x20. The 16x19 was made by Wilson probably since it is so popular they could make two versions and some people asked for a 16x19 pattern. It is still a relatively light stick and as a result, the spin with an 18x20 pattern is very high due to racquet head speed.
It trumps the Radical Pro by far for me. Far easier to swing and it's just a lighter stick in general. The YT Rad Pro really grabbed me when I first got it, but the SW was 345 (my blades are 331) and bugged my shoulder.
__________________
🐐ing |
|
|
|
| Power Player |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Power Player |
|
|
#14 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 183
|
For someone coming from Babolat Aero Storm Tour, would the Blades swing weight make up for the slightly dropped regular weight?
__________________
Vamos. |
|
|
|
| thecrusher956 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by thecrusher956 |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,205
|
Quote:
Skip 7 & 9 on the old BLX blade 98 (18x20). The 16x19 skip 8t and 8h. The string is more open at the throat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,205
|
Quote:
We played on clay today (2 ½ hours) and the courts were wet so difficult to compare ground strokes. This weekend plan a full workout practice session on hard courts. The racket is one of the better looking Wilson frames, Black and Silver. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 393
|
Thanks PP and Barry. Much appreciated. Interesting that the SW difference of 331 to 345 was so significant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 125
|
Has anyone tried the new 98 versus the H22 or H19? I am curious mainly because the new Blade 98 18x20 looks to get good marks on TW for arm friendliness, and the H22 has caused some people with arm issues some tenderness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 776
|
My son hit with the 16x19 version and he likes it. The problem is that we are gun shy because he broke all of his blade 98 rackets near the grip.
__________________
Wilson 6.1 95 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
New User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 5
|
Can anyone compare the Prince Rebel 98 to the new Blade 98 16x19? I like the Rebel after demo but haven't had the chance to hit the new blade yet. I'm a 3.5-4.0 player, mostly flat hitter trying to gain some spin. Ive had some elbow issues so i like the feel of the Rebel. Should I wait to demo the new blade before I take the plunge?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|