|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: ? | |||
| Yes |
|
11 | 39.29% |
| No |
|
16 | 57.14% |
| Maybe |
|
0 | 0% |
| I don't know. |
|
0 | 0% |
| Can you repeat the question? |
|
4 | 14.29% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,496
|
Quote:
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70´s and 80´s" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13,623
|
No way a 40+ years old can compete against the modern pro. Sampras can compete on the senior tour. Unless if he was playing in the 60s when it wasn't that competitive, then it's doable since Pancho can still compete despite well past his prime.
__________________
NadalAgassi: I think Serena's final slam tally will be something from 18-27. My best guess is 24 or 25 though; Nole(2010) will never win Wimbledon |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,369
|
Could be very sad if he did.
He went out a winner - best to stay that way. Remember what happened to Borg. |
|
|
|
| Paul Murphy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Paul Murphy |
|
|
#24 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 932
|
No, he gave enough to the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
New User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 42
|
no
he achieved what he set out to achieve and had nothing left to prove to himself he has said this himself many times wimbledon offered him a wildcard in 2007, and he rightly refused there is still the seniors tour, as well as other invitational tournaments and exhibitions that being said, sampras still has the serve. check out his matches at blackrock championships versus mcenroe still lethal |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 156
|
It would be just like when Michael Jordan came out of retirement and played for the Wizards. Except Sampras would have no younger teammates to rely on. He would win some matches sure. But his legacy would be altered a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |||
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,271
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Right, because Federer was really playing his top level tennis in those matches, and not keeping it close for the entertainment. |
|||
|
|
|
| woodrow1029 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by woodrow1029 |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|