• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Strings
Reload this Page Anyone else like their racquet setups boardy?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 4 of 4 « First < 23 4
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2012, 08:48 AM   #61
Logic Dude
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlm View Post
Okay but the date this was taken says January 2012. I am using gamma power play kevlar at 58 lbs. in the mains with yonex poly tour spin crosses at 63 lbs. right now. So I would not be much higher than what a lot of pro players string at. Also I could care less what the pro's string at that means nothing to me, I go by what works not what some pro uses.

Which again I will point out means nothing to amateur players unless you change your string every half hour like they do. So many here say I am using similar tensions of what the pro's use, well ya you are for a half hour or so but not 2 hours later let alone days.

But I am still experimenting with different set ups, I just put in a set of head sonic pro 16 gauge at 68 lbs. and am going for a hit with it today.

I have already tried this at the same tension with the 17 gauge and it was pretty good, but still did not maintain the control that the kevlar set up I am using as my go to string. Just trying to find a poly set up that will match it.
You say you don't care what the pros use, yet you insist on using them as justification for high tensions.

Can I ask for the logic in that?
Logic Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Logic Dude
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Logic Dude
Old 12-08-2012, 09:19 AM   #62
jason586
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 149
Default

I also like a boardy feel in a racquet. My favorite feel to date was my i.prestige MP 18x20 with full poly at about 55lbs, but the weight was too much over time as mine was nearly 13oz with dampener, leather, and overgrip.

I read most the TT posts on the Iontec strings and read that you thought Iontec Hexa 1.25 was too soft even after you went up to 52 lbs.
*Did you use it in a full bed or hybrid?
*Did you ever try higher than 52 lbs?
*Did you try raising the tension on the crosses to firm up the Hexa 1.25 stringbed?
*The most recent poly used is Genesis Black Magic - How would you compare BM to Hexa 1.25 and which feels softer/less crisp?
*I read that you felt you lost some feel as well with the Iontec Hexa - I have been playing with a leather grip (no overgrip), so maybe that will help with some of the the lack of feel?
*My Vantage 95" is an open pattern 16x19, but it is the firmer 70 flex. So maybe the 1.25 Hexa would play firm in it since it is a firm racquet?
__________________
RACQUETS: Vantage 95 (Strung: 11.6 oz, 3HL, 67ra, 16x19, 27")
CURRENT STRING: Genesis BM 16 @ 54lbs Mains / OGSM (white) 17 @ 58lbs Crosses
jason586 is offline   Reply With Quote
jason586
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jason586
Old 12-08-2012, 03:22 PM   #63
tlm
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logic Dude View Post
You say you don't care what the pros use, yet you insist on using them as justification for high tensions.

Can I ask for the logic in that?
I don't care what tension they use, but if you notice PP said that no high level players use that high of tension so I showed that there are many that do.
tlm is offline   Reply With Quote
tlm
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tlm
Old 12-08-2012, 03:26 PM   #64
Power Player
G.O.A.T.
 
Power Player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,548
Default

I saw 1 that strung full poly at 68 and he hits harder than most of the world's population.
__________________
🐐ing
Power Player is offline   Reply With Quote
Power Player
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Power Player
Old 12-08-2012, 03:48 PM   #65
tlm
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Player View Post
I saw 1 that strung full poly at 68 and he hits harder than most of the world's population.
You missed Melzer he uses 75 lbs. If I used a 18 main pattern like you do I don't think I would be much over the high 50's. It has been a long time since I tried a 18x20. But what you were saying about the lower trajectory and better control you get with the tight pattern makes me wonder how that would work for me I will have to demo one.

By the way just got back from hitting with head sonic pro at 68 lbs. and it played pretty good, not harsh at all. But still not as good of control as my kevlar hybrid, but definitely more comfortable.
tlm is offline   Reply With Quote
tlm
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tlm
Old 12-08-2012, 03:52 PM   #66
pheonix6579
Semi-Pro
 
pheonix6579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 754
Send a message via AIM to pheonix6579
Default

Didn't Blake use poly @70?
__________________
4x Ozone Pro Tour. BHBR 54/52. Gamma Supreme OG. #64 RB...with only short term flings with KPS88, PB8 315, PDR, CAPed YT Radical, Rebel 95....
pheonix6579 is offline   Reply With Quote
pheonix6579
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pheonix6579
Old 12-08-2012, 04:22 PM   #67
Power Player
G.O.A.T.
 
Power Player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlm View Post
You missed Melzer he uses 75 lbs. If I used a 18 main pattern like you do I don't think I would be much over the high 50's. It has been a long time since I tried a 18x20. But what you were saying about the lower trajectory and better control you get with the tight pattern makes me wonder how that would work for me I will have to demo one.

By the way just got back from hitting with head sonic pro at 68 lbs. and it played pretty good, not harsh at all. But still not as good of control as my kevlar hybrid, but definitely more comfortable.
I think Melzer is using a multi, not a full poly..but regardless, I like the 18x20 a lot and the pattern itself contributes a lot to much better ball feel.
__________________
🐐ing
Power Player is offline   Reply With Quote
Power Player
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Power Player
Old 12-08-2012, 04:34 PM   #68
tlm
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Player View Post
I think Melzer is using a multi, not a full poly..but regardless, I like the 18x20 a lot and the pattern itself contributes a lot to much better ball feel.
What racket are you using? How much spin did you lose when you switched to the 18x20?
tlm is offline   Reply With Quote
tlm
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tlm
Old 12-08-2012, 04:49 PM   #69
Power Player
G.O.A.T.
 
Power Player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,548
Default

Blade 98. I lost no spin because I generate that with head speed. The trajectory is just lower and I prefer the control. I like a nice swingweight, light static and tight pattern. I feel like it is an extremely powerful combo for a natural spin hitter that wants to still drive through the ball.
__________________
🐐ing
Power Player is offline   Reply With Quote
Power Player
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Power Player
Old 12-08-2012, 06:20 PM   #70
tlm
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Player View Post
Blade 98. I lost no spin because I generate that with head speed. The trajectory is just lower and I prefer the control. I like a nice swingweight, light static and tight pattern. I feel like it is an extremely powerful combo for a natural spin hitter that wants to still drive through the ball.
I will have to try one, that is one of the reasons I like kevlar it hits a lower trajectory. Maybe I can get that with a 18x20 without having to use a harsh string like kevlar or high tension poly.
tlm is offline   Reply With Quote
tlm
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tlm
Old 12-13-2012, 05:44 AM   #71
Povl Carstensen
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,133
Default

I am liking my 18/20 rackets at the moment around 50 (and the Fischer Vac Pro 16/20). It motivates you to hit through the ball instead of brushing (which I think 16/19 and lower tensions makes you do more). I think Andreas Seppi is a good example of this through the ball hitting. Wonder what his setup is.
__________________
K90, Gosen OG Micro 16, 23 kg.

Last edited by Povl Carstensen : 12-13-2012 at 05:52 AM.
Povl Carstensen is offline   Reply With Quote
Povl Carstensen
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Povl Carstensen
Old 12-13-2012, 06:08 AM   #72
Power Player
G.O.A.T.
 
Power Player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Povl Carstensen View Post
I am liking my 18/20 rackets at the moment around 50 (and the Fischer Vac Pro 16/20). It motivates you to hit through the ball instead of brushing (which I think 16/19 and lower tensions makes you do more). I think Andreas Seppi is a good example of this through the ball hitting. Wonder what his setup is.
Really agree with this. I can hit with a lot of spin so whenever I start brushing the ball, I can get caught into a trap of overspinning.

I think that is the main reason I love the 18x20, tight patterns as well.

I have settled back on 4g mains and OGSM crosses at 50/52. It is simply the best setup I have used for this racquet by a mile.
__________________
🐐ing
Power Player is offline   Reply With Quote
Power Player
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Power Player
Old 12-13-2012, 06:21 AM   #73
Povl Carstensen
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,133
Default

To be more precise, what I am looking for is perhaps not boardy, but pocketing without being mushy. So I have abandoned my K and BLX 90's for a while.
__________________
K90, Gosen OG Micro 16, 23 kg.
Povl Carstensen is offline   Reply With Quote
Povl Carstensen
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Povl Carstensen
Old 12-13-2012, 08:35 AM   #74
3fees
Professional
 
3fees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,026
Post

I have several 18x20, I like soft setups,one is syn gut mains 16/poly crosses 17, currently using 55/51, the string bed is more firmer(boardier) than using 18 ga Lux ace and Gen. Hexonic 18L in mains and crosses at about the same tension, one thing I have noticed is I can swing easier to get the ball placed with power using the hybrid setup and it costs are minimal,,I think i try a hybrid setup with syn gut/lux ace and see if I can improve the present hybrid.

From these playtests, I can understand why Pro's are using thicker gauge.



For Rod "The Rocket" Laver fans whom dont know, his strings were textured nylon-these cost an arm and a leg in the day, i seen these strings come out on eray 5 sets for about two weeks out of australia, some time ago..

Last edited by 3fees : 12-13-2012 at 09:14 AM.
3fees is online now   Reply With Quote
3fees
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by 3fees
Old 12-13-2012, 01:55 PM   #75
Povl Carstensen
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,133
Default

Yes, thicker strings somehow put more meat, more beef behind the ball, imo. Which is positive for through the ball hitting.
__________________
K90, Gosen OG Micro 16, 23 kg.

Last edited by Povl Carstensen : 12-14-2012 at 02:08 AM.
Povl Carstensen is offline   Reply With Quote
Povl Carstensen
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Povl Carstensen
Old 01-12-2013, 02:22 AM   #76
Relinquis
Hall Of Fame
 
Relinquis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On the courts; hard & clay ...
Posts: 4,324
Default

Have any of you had success with Multis or Natural Gut strung at high tensions (upper limit of recommended range)?

I'm trying to avoid poly as I don't want to put stress on my joints.
__________________
Disclaimer: I'm NOT a coach...
Real tennis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDqnkLJ9BtM
Relinquis is offline   Reply With Quote
Relinquis
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Relinquis
Old 01-12-2013, 10:13 AM   #77
NLBwell
Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,476
Default

I played ProBlend for many many years. I like a very stiff stringbed with an open string pattern. It allows me to get spin when I want and yet control my harder flatter shots.
Full Alu Rough works well for me. Also, Alu Rough with AlphaGut2000. Both in the mid 50s.
I've tried gut/poly low 60s/high 50s - 4lb differential between mains and crosses. I put in stringsavers around the outer 3 or 4 strings of the stringbed as the poly loosens up (I've got ~65 of them in now) to keep a stiff controllable stringbed. I'm using these rackets during the winter for arm comfort.

Last edited by NLBwell : 01-12-2013 at 10:15 AM.
NLBwell is offline   Reply With Quote
NLBwell
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NLBwell
Old 01-12-2013, 04:05 PM   #78
rdis10093
Hall Of Fame
 
rdis10093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: states
Posts: 2,768
Default

I love it, but my arm hates it
__________________
rdis 93 with lux adrenaline rough/syn gut @ 58/56
rdis10093 is offline   Reply With Quote
rdis10093
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by rdis10093
Old 01-12-2013, 06:09 PM   #79
theyhatethecans
New User
 
theyhatethecans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 79
Default

Big fan of boardy. Springy es no bueno.
theyhatethecans is offline   Reply With Quote
theyhatethecans
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by theyhatethecans
Old 01-12-2013, 06:27 PM   #80
martini1
Hall Of Fame
 
martini1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Player View Post
Finally came to a realization after some solid racquet and string experimentation - I love a boardy racquet setup. It is almost used sometimes as a bad word, but to me it is sublime. When you hit through the ball, the feel on the sweetspot is absolute bliss, and the control gives me a ton of confidence in a pressure situation.

What I notice is with softer setups, I have to brush more and use more spin to control the ball. With a tighter, boardy setup I can hit through the ball more and not overspin the ball. I also am able to hybrid my poly mains with a syn gut and therefore have a tighter tension which helps me do this even more.

The final equation is the 18x20 pattern. The tight pattern definitely feels better to me. I firmly believe open patterns are more launchy and lose ball feel. More strings = more feel for me.

What about spin you say? This is a setup for players that can hit with spin already and want to be able to come through the ball more. An 18x20 pattern makes you work a little harder for spin, but the result is a very penetrating ball that does not sit up, and instead kicks forward - speeding the ball up off the bounce. A lot of players dont see this ball as much so that is a nice bonus. a little less weight on the racquet can help generate this.

Anyway, the point of this thread is to find the best boardy control setup out there. Here is mine so far: 4G 17 and OGSM 16 at 52/54. I really would like to find a cheaper replacement for the 4g, but so far nothing has come close. I have tried Cyberflash/OGSM (too soft..not enough feel - but a solid budget option) Cyclone/NVY (too springy - Nvy is an amazing cross but not for a boardy setup).

Cost advantage of 4g is it holds tension for a long time. You can play this setup for close to 2 weeks. The control level is off the charts as well.

My next setup to challenge : Tour bite 17 and Wilson Stamina - 52/54.
I demoed the Head speed 18x20 with some multi full bed and I got nothing going with that stick. I think with 18x20 and "feel", you need natural gut in the formula.
martini1 is offline   Reply With Quote
martini1
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by martini1
Reply
Page 4 of 4 « First < 23 4

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Strings
Reload this Page Anyone else like their racquet setups boardy?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:25 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse