Djokovic: best player for the last two years!

[djokovic2008]

Originally Posted by tennis_pro

Federer lost 1 set in 2010 and he faced Ferrer, Soderling, Murray, Djokovic and Nadal, in fact he won the first 9 sets before Nadal leveled the final at 1 set all.

Lol comparing years makes you sound bitter just soak in djokers win.

[Hitman]

Djokovic has been amazing these past two years, and I glad he retained the number one ranking for the year.. Well deserved in a year, when the big four truly shone above the others.

[Sabratha]

Djokovic is the best player of 2011 and 2012, that's the honest truth right there.

[kishnabe]

I agree he was defintly the best for 2011 and marginaly in 2012.

2013....would be interesting if he can keep it up. Not many have been the dominant player for three years.

[Mike Sams]

Going to be very difficult for anybody to beat an in-form Djokovic at the AO. The one with the best chance based on form is Andy Murray. I don't think Federer will be able to get through Djokovic on the slow AO surface which favours pushers, grinders and defensive specialists. He hasn't had much luck in their 2 previous meetings on that surface.

[Love_No1e]

I think 2012 was the year the top 3 against Djokovic upped their game. They had to since he was the man to beat after 2011. And yet he still came out on top which should give him a LOT of confidence. Just hope he starts the year in form like he has been doing for the past 2 years and I hope he can perform at the big stages consistently once again like 2011 and to a lesser extent 2012.

[mbm0912]

Year of the Djoker

[jokinla]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

There can now be no doubt he has been the best for the last two years and won this tournament without losing a match. Fed said he could not have played any better which is true he was good but congrats to djoker the best in the world.

He might have been the most consistent, but a 30+ year old Fed still spanked him 6-0!

[Gonzo_style]

Originally Posted by kishnabe

I agree he was defintly the best for 2011 and marginaly in 2012.

2655 ATP points

Originally Posted by jokinla

He might have been the most consistent, but a 30+ year old Fed still spanked him 6-0!

OK I'm tired of this "30+ year old" *****! Prime Fed, MonoFed, baby Djoker, God mode Djoker!

H2H says 16-13 for Federer, without this nonsense above!

[Feather]

Originally Posted by zagor

Congrats to Novak, even if it doesn't compare to his 2011, he still had a terrific year and will be the main favourite for AO in my book.

Regarding you LOLville, we'll talk again when Nadal turns 31

Who is LOLville here? OP? But wasn't LOL ville a Nadal fan? This guy is a Djokovic fanatic

[Feather]

On the topic

Congrats to Novak Djokovic, he deserved to be number one in 2012

[zagor]

Originally Posted by Feather

Who is LOLville here? OP?

I suspect so, yes.

Originally Posted by Feather

But wasn't LOL ville a Nadal fan?

Yes but so is the OP.

Originally Posted by Feather

This guy is a Djokovic fanatic

Absolutely not, the whole point of this thread was not to praise Novak but rather this part:

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

There can now be no doubt he has been the best for the last two years and won this tournament without losing a match. Fed said he could not have played any better which is true he was good but congrats to djoker the best in the world.

As I said, he'll get what's coming to him once Nadal gets into 29+ age territory.

[Feather]

Originally Posted by zagor

I suspect so, yes.



Yes but so is the OP.



Absolutely not, the whole point of this thread was not to praise Novak but rather this part:
.

I see your point. You, my friend, have a good observation

[zagor]

Originally Posted by Feather

I see your point. You, my friend, have a good observation

Maybe, or maybe I'm wrong, who knows? Either way it's not that important

[tennis_pro]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Lol comparing years makes you sound bitter just soak in djokers win.

Well you said "Djokovic didn't lose a match at the WTF this year" which makes it sound like some ultrahuman achievement, Federer won the WTF a gazillion times without losing a match and often lost only a set in the entire tournament.

[Gonzo_style]

Originally Posted by DropShotArtist

Let's face it, Djoker got pretty lucky on some bad UE's by Fed at crucial points. Could have gone the other way just as easily.

Pointless post, their matches were always tight! Djoker also missed some easy FHs on SP in first set.

[NadalAgassi]

Originally Posted by jokinla

He might have been the most consistent, but a 30+ year old Fed still spanked him 6-0!

Federer has lost multiple 6-2 sets at the U.S Open to broken backed 35 year old Agassi. Try harder next time.

[jokinla]

Originally Posted by NadalAgassi

Federer has lost multiple 6-2 sets at the U.S Open to broken backed 35 year old Agassi. Try harder next time.

You're talking about matches that Federer won, against a guy he beat the last 8 times they played, and about a guy who retired years ago, who has nothing to do with Djokovic and the last two years of Djokovic's career, so perhaps you should try harder, better yet, stay remotely on topic.

[kragster]

Originally Posted by zagor

I suspect so, yes.



Yes but so is the OP.



Absolutely not, the whole point of this thread was not to praise Novak but rather this part:



As I said, he'll get what's coming to him once Nadal gets into 29+ age territory.

I think you are both right and wrong. It is quite possible to be a Rafa fan, Djoker fan and Fed hater, all in one .

[tennis_pro]

Originally Posted by NadalAgassi

Federer has lost multiple 6-2 sets at the U.S Open to broken backed 35 year old Agassi. Try harder next time.

Federer ain't American and Agassi at 33-35 could still play darn well, especially on US hard courts.