Djokovic: best player for the last two years!

[djokovic2008]

Originally Posted by zagor

I suspect so, yes.



Yes but so is the OP.



Absolutely not, the whole point of this thread was not to praise Novak but rather this part:



As I said, he'll get what's coming to him once Nadal gets into 29+ age territory.

Zagor is one of the most clueless posters on here anyone with half a brain can see I'm a djoker fanatic and proud of it. Nadal has my respect and so does fed to a lesser extent. I'll see you come AO 13 PAL.

[djokovic2008]

Originally Posted by Feather

I see your point. You, my friend, have a good observation

Look heather stay out of it I have had dealings with you in the past and won every argument as you seem new to tennis, I'm guessing you got into it around wimbledon 2012 right? typical.

[djokovic2008]

Originally Posted by jokinla

He might have been the most consistent, but a 30+ year old Fed still spanked him 6-0!

Oh Jokinla, what fitting name as you regulary come out with posts like this, your average fanboy with no tennis logic. I'm sure you'll go missing come the final of the AO just like the rest of the *******s always do.

[tennis_pro]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Zagor is one of the most clueless posters on here anyone with half a brain can see I'm a djoker fanatic and proud of it. Nadal has my respect and so does fed to a lesser extent. I'll see you come AO 13 PAL.

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Look heather stay out of it I have had dealings with you in the past and won every argument as you seem new to tennis, I'm guessing you got into it around wimbledon 2012 right? typical.

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Oh Jokinla, what fitting name as you regulary come out with posts like this, your average fanboy with no tennis logic. I'm sure you'll go missing come the final of the AO just like the rest of the *******s always do.

You'll sure have a lot of friends with such attitude.

[djokovic2008]

Originally Posted by tennis_pro

You'll sure have a lot of friends with such attitude.

I have friends in real life this is a forum please do not get fiction mixed up with reality.

[zagor]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Zagor is one of the most clueless posters on here...

If you say so.

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

...anyone with half a brain can see I'm a djoker fanatic and proud of it.

No.

You're a:

1) Fed hater



-big gap-



2) Nadal fan


The fact that you root for Novak when he plays Fed doesn't make you a Novak fan because in your case Novak shares that distinction with the whole ATP tour.

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Nadal has my respect and so does fed to a lesser extent.

Nadal has your worship and Fed has your hatred (don't think it's too strong of a word in your case).

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

I'll see you come AO 13 PAL.

Indeed, try not to crap your pants if Nadal has to face Murray or Novak at AO.

Also, you better hope Nadal wins a slam in 2013 otherwise a thread about "equation" might be coming your way.

[djokovic2008]

Originally Posted by zagor

If you say so.




No.

You're a:

1) Fed hater



-big gap-



2) Nadal fan


The fact that you root for Novak when he plays Fed doesn't make you a Novak fan because in your case Novak shares that distinction with the whole ATP tour.



Nadal has your worship and Fed has your hatred (don't think it's too strong of a word in your case).



Indeed, try not to crap your pants if Nadal has to face Murray or Novak at AO.

Also, you better hope Nadal wins a slam in 2013 otherwise a thread about "equation" might be coming your way.

The only one I will be rooting for is Novak the great but nice try.

[jokinla]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Oh Jokinla, what fitting name as you regulary come out with posts like this, your average fanboy with no tennis logic. I'm sure you'll go missing come the final of the AO just like the rest of the *******s always do.

Not surprisingly you're the one lacking logic if you refute the 6-0 spanking Fed gave him, sucks doesn't it. As for the AO, isn't that the tournament that nobody has won more in the Open era than Fed, yeah that's right, I won't go missing, but I'm sure you hope Fed goes missing, you don't want him taking #1 away from your hero again, must suck to know your idol in his prime, can't keep a 31 year old Fed down.

[hoodjem]

Originally Posted by Gonzo_style

I'm tired of this "30+ year old" *****! Prime Fed, MonoFed, baby Djoker, God mode Djoker!

H2H says 16-13 for Federer, without this nonsense above!

How do you really feel?

[timnz]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

There can now be no doubt he has been the best for the last two years and won this tournament without losing a match. Fed said he could not have played any better which is true he was good but congrats to djoker the best in the world.

He has been the year end best, but not the best for the whole of the two years. Federer for instance was number 1 for 4 months of this year.

[Gonzo_style]

Originally Posted by hoodjem

How do you really feel?

Sorry, about what?

[zam88]

he's played in what.. 7 of the last 9 major finals and won 4 of those..

he's been very good.

At what's crazy is that Federer had Djokavic 2011/2012 type of seasons for the better part of 5 years.. 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009... i mean all were 2-3 slam seasons.

If Djokavic wants to get anywhere near Federer level.. he has to have another 2011 in 2013 AND 14

[Gonzo_style]

Originally Posted by zam88

he's played in what.. 7 of the last 9 major finals and won 4 of those..

he's been very good.

At what's crazy is that Federer had Djokavic 2011/2012 type of seasons for the better part of 5 years.. 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009... i mean all were 2-3 slam seasons.

If Djokavic wants to get anywhere near Federer level.. he has to have another 2011 in 2013 AND 14

Novak Djokovic

[djokovic2008]

Originally Posted by zam88

he's played in what.. 7 of the last 9 major finals and won 4 of those..
he's been very good.

At what's crazy is that Federer had Djokavic 2011/2012 type of seasons for the better part of 5 years.. 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009... i mean all were 2-3 slam seasons.

If Djokavic wants to get anywhere near Federer level.. he has to have another 2011 in 2013 AND 14

And who were his opponents compared to feds? I'm sure you would agree playing Nadal and murray and fed is tougher than playing blake davy roddick you get my point.

[jokinla]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

And who were his opponents compared to feds? I'm sure you would agree playing Nadal and murray and fed is tougher than playing blake davy roddick you get my point.

Neither Blake nor Davydenko have ever played in the final of a major.

[zam88]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

And who were his opponents compared to feds? I'm sure you would agree playing Nadal and murray and fed is tougher than playing blake davy roddick you get my point.

Roddick would've been a 5 slam winner and considered an all-time great if Federer had never been born.

Maybe he would've even been better than that because his spirit wouldn't have been crushed

[1477aces]

roddick was clearly better. He had a better head to head, and if he hadn't gotten terribly unlucky with the rain delays in 04, he would have been world no. 1. The momentum from that match was huge, I bet fed wouldn't have reached 10 grand slams if he had lost that, and roddick would have at least 5 grand slams. Don't forget, had he won, he wouldn't have fired brad gilbert. As for djokovic, that pusher wouldn't have had a chance in hell against roddick, prime james blake, davydenko, marat safin, nalbandian, etc. Heck he probably would have lost el aynaiou. imagining djokovic trying to push on fast grass or on the old u.s open surface would be hilarious. Heck, even old man agassi could probably have beat "prime" pusher djokovic. Back in those days, people could hit the crap out of the ball randomly, like rosol did except even better and far more of them doing it far more frequently. A pusher like djokovic would have no chance except on clay.

[NadalAgassi]

Originally Posted by zam88

Roddick would've been a 5 slam winner and considered an all-time great if Federer had never been born.

Which already says enough about the quality of the field in the Federer era, lol!

[Povl Carstensen]

Which allready says that the field would have been called strong and competitive had Federer not been around.

[djokovic2008]

Originally Posted by 1477aces

roddick was clearly better. He had a better head to head, and if he hadn't gotten terribly unlucky with the rain delays in 04, he would have been world no. 1. The momentum from that match was huge, I bet fed wouldn't have reached 10 grand slams if he had lost that, and roddick would have at least 5 grand slams. Don't forget, had he won, he wouldn't have fired brad gilbert. As for djokovic, that pusher wouldn't have had a chance in hell against roddick, prime james blake, davydenko, marat safin, nalbandian, etc. Heck he probably would have lost el aynaiou. imagining djokovic trying to push on fast grass or on the old u.s open surface would be hilarious. Heck, even old man agassi could probably have beat "prime" pusher djokovic. Back in those days, people could hit the crap out of the ball randomly, like rosol did except even better and far more of them doing it far more frequently. A pusher like djokovic would have no chance except on clay.

Seriously have you been smoking CRACK, the reason he only has one slam is because of fed as fed smacked him about in slams right, But djoker has beat fed in slams and what was the h2h vs roddick and djoker from 2011 onwards?
PLEASE your embarrassing yourself.