USTA Sectional Opens Counting for TRN Rankings - 4/1 - 7/31

[CoachDad]

To me its simple, tennis is one on one and things are aged based from day 1. The 10s, 12s, etc. I think it would be better to have it very transparent and have rankings based on class for college coaches and age for the rest of us.

Come on now, who among us would not check out rankings lists that had the best kids based on ages broken down to quarters? The best 15.25s, the best 15.5s.

Not that it is earth shattering....just cool to see who is the highest ranked for their age. Also fun to track how it correlates as they age. I think a site that did such a thing with documented birth dates would be very popular. The actual birth dates could be kept private by the organization within, rolling over randomly within a 10 day period.

I think it would be more for fun than substance, but popular none the less.

[Tennishacker]

Originally Posted by tball2day

For TR, class serves their audience, which is the college coaches, cause they don't really care about the age.

For parents and players it is frustrating cause older and better junior gets all this press and actually does get benefits when he/she is playing. How would things be different for Fratangelo if he played his age and had progressed where he was "suppose to" versus having an extra year in "high school"? From what I see, it gave him a year to test out the pros before committing to a college like other players his age had to. Nice benefit.

It is annoying for fellow players and parents, I see that. But all you can do is start your player later or move them back prior to high school and be one of them, cause it will always be an issue.

In hind sight, I would of started my kids 1-2 years later. One of my kids graduated at 17, the other turned 18 in March of senior year.

[tball2day]

......................

[CoachDad]

Originally Posted by tball2day

Ya, would like to see age on there for sure, just doesn't sound like it will happen. I still don't get the legal thing since ITF puts them out there.....as long as they play an ITF it can always be had from there, but not the same as if it were on TR. Not trying to start that up again, just sayin...

Yeah, they could use some computer deal so the actual birth date is not posted. Its an ad driven thing. How many tennis parents and players and family members would check out the age based rankings? I think a lot and often.

Again....more for giggles than substance.

[friedalo1]

I will try to play all your tournaments. Too bad my kid is just 12 and 10. Lot of your tournaments are for 14 and over. I played one of your campus jr vs college clinics. It was fun she . she won 3 matchs lost 2.

[Chemist]

Originally Posted by Tennishacker

In hind sight, I would of started my kids 1-2 years later. One of my kids graduated at 17, the other turned 18 in March of senior year.

Once our children start college, they will play players several years older. I believe that a junior who likes to play up would be more successful in college tennis. Starting school a year or two late or repeating 8th grades would surely help boosting her/his TRN ranking that is dependent on the year of graduation. But would anybody honestly believe that this kid is a much better tennis player by repeating the 8th grade?

[Misterbill]

Originally Posted by Chemist

Once our children start college, they will play players several years older. I believe that a junior who likes to play up would be more successful in college tennis. Starting school a year or two late or repeating 8th grades would surely help boosting her/his TRN ranking that is dependent on the year of graduation. But would anybody honestly believe that this kid is a much better tennis player by repeating the 8th grade?

Agreed.

In addition, aren't the vast majority of high school graduates 17 or 18 years old on graduation day?

Or maybe I am wrong and there are a lot of 19 and 20 year old high school graduation day graduates out there? Based on my small slice of experience, I don't think high school is the right place for most 19 or 20 year olds............tennis or no tennis

[chalkflewup]

Originally Posted by Erman

You said"I bet most college coaches believe your ranking. If not, they re missing out. The only time I ve seen it not predict well, is when one player has been hiding ( sandbagging), coming back from injury, or there is a psychological factor between the players."

The system is still getting rigged. There are a couple of 2013 players who decided to repeat or prolong or redo their sophomore/junior year and now jumped up in rankings and stars/chips. Almost like an artificial "gap" year.

Keep in mind that rankings are often the starting point, but still just a tool, not an entrance exam into college. Coaches still want to see a kid hit a ball, preferably in a match with some adversity. At the end of the day, a college coach is more concerned in seeing firsthand a kid's ability to hold serve (singles) and volley (doubles) than a TRN or USTA ranking.

[Chemist]

Originally Posted by chalkflewup

Keep in mind that rankings are often the starting point, but still just a tool, not an entrance exam into college. Coaches still want to see a kid hit a ball, preferably in a match with some adversity. At the end of the day, a college coach is more concerned in seeing firsthand a kid's ability to hold serve (singles) and volley (doubles) than a TRN or USTA ranking.

100% agree! Dartmouth recruited a girl in our section early this year when she was a 3 star. Now her TRN ranking is near top 50 after winning section championship and national open. TRN ranking will get coaches' initial attention. This is actually rather important. The following is a true story - my friend's daughter was attending a full-time tennis academy and she started to write coaches of D1 schools when her TRN ranking was about #100. She got very few positive responses. The coach of a top D1 team did not even bother to answer the email. This coach went to watch a match of a blue chip at one of the super nationals. Guess what, that blue chip was playing my friend's daughter. Even though she lost the match, the coach was impressed enough to offer her (of course the blue chip as well) a spot on the team. She became a top 30 5 star several months later and may play a higher position than the blue chip in the spring. Had a nice conversation with Bryan Shelton, the most humble and nicest tennis person I have ever met - Coach Shelton told me that he likes to recruit a kid who shows improvement year after year since this is the best indication that this recruit would continue to improve in college.

[matchplay]

Originally Posted by chalkflewup

Keep in mind that rankings are often the starting point, but still just a tool, not an entrance exam into college. Coaches still want to see a kid hit a ball, preferably in a match with some adversity. At the end of the day, a college coach is more concerned in seeing firsthand a kid's ability to hold serve (singles) and volley (doubles) than a TRN or USTA ranking.

you are spot on

[tennis5]

Originally Posted by chalkflewup

Keep in mind that rankings are often the starting point, but still just a tool, not an entrance exam into college. Coaches still want to see a kid hit a ball, preferably in a match with some adversity. At the end of the day, a college coach is more concerned in seeing firsthand a kid's ability to hold serve (singles) and volley (doubles) than a TRN or USTA ranking.

While I agree ( and have heard from coaches directly) they like to see a player hit in a match to view many different aspects
of the kids game ( sportsmanship and style), it will be harder for kids to be seen with the upcoming proposed cuts.

[andfor]

^^^That's your opinion. What facts do you have that show coaches will recruit less due to the changes? Coaches know who they want to watch before they go to a tournament. Players are not discovered by coaches stumbling around a tournament and randomly noticing a rondom kid playing on random court.

[tennis5]

Originally Posted by andfor

^^^That's your opinion. What facts do you have that show coaches will recruit less due to the changes? Coaches know who they want to watch before they go to a tournament. Players are not discovered by coaches stumbling around a tournament and randomly noticing a rondom kid playing on random court.

Andfor,

Last time, we communicated through Talk Tennis, you said I was Chalk...

Now, while Chalk is a nice guy, he is a pro USTA guy.

Since, about 99.999999999% of my posts are Anti USTA, I am not sure you could confuse us...


Ok, well I respectfully disagree with your opinion.

My opinion is based on personal experience of what I have witnessed at national tournaments.

And if you are reading this whole thread, you can look 1 post up from my original post on this subject, and Chemist wrote the following:

Originally Posted by Chemist

100% agree! Dartmouth recruited a girl in our section early this year when she was a 3 star.....
.... This coach went to watch a match of a blue chip at one of the super nationals. Guess what, that blue chip was playing my friend's daughter. Even though she lost the match, the coach was impressed enough to offer her (of course the blue chip as well) a spot on the team. She became a top 30 5 star several months later and may play a higher position than the blue chip in the spring.

So, I would say that was a random kid that the coach looked at in that match. The coach did not have that junior on his or her list.

And I am not Chemist either....

[Chemist]

Originally Posted by tennis5

Andfor,

Last time, we communicated through Talk Tennis, you said I was Chalk...

Now, while Chalk is a nice guy, he is a pro USTA guy.

Since, about 99.999999999% of my posts are Anti USTA, I am not sure you could confuse us...


Ok, well I respectfully disagree with your opinion.

My opinion is based on personal experience of what I have witnessed at national tournaments.

And if you are reading this whole thread, you can look 1 post up from my original post on this subject, and Chemist wrote the following:

So, I would say that was a random kid that the coach looked at in that match. The coach did not have that junior on his or her list.

And I am not Chemist either....

I am actually a chemist... Kalamazoo is a great tournament that our kids would have opportunities to talk to college coaches or have a fairly good chance to be seen by coaches (randomly). The tournament scheduled both 16s and 18s matches on the same site. My son, playing 16s, initiated the conversation with two coaches and asked them to watch his match. One did. Two coaches were watching other kids, near the court on which my son played. Even he lost the 3rd set, I believe he left some positive impression with these coaches because they visited his TRN page that evening.

[andfor]

Originally Posted by tennis5

Andfor,

Last time, we communicated through Talk Tennis, you said I was Chalk...

Now, while Chalk is a nice guy, he is a pro USTA guy.

Since, about 99.999999999% of my posts are Anti USTA, I am not sure you could confuse us...


Ok, well I respectfully disagree with your opinion.

My opinion is based on personal experience of what I have witnessed at national tournaments.

And if you are reading this whole thread, you can look 1 post up from my original post on this subject, and Chemist wrote the following:




So, I would say that was a random kid that the coach looked at in that match. The coach did not have that junior on his or her list.

And I am not Chemist either....

In this case, just as I said the coach knew who he was going to watch. And in this case they coach happened to like who his targeted player was playing. So according to you, this will never happen again. I understand where your coming from, but this one-off expample will remain the same under the the new system, one-off, and will still happen.

The USTA while they are very misguided, the sky is not falling and although today is 12/21 the world will not end. College tennis recruiting will continue and on occasion a once unidentified player will be discovered by a college coach who did not know they existed.

[Chemist]

Originally Posted by andfor

In this case, just as I said the coach knew who he was going to watch. And in this case they coach happened to like who his targeted player was playing. So according to you, this will never happen again. I understand where your coming from, but this one-off expample will remain the same under the the new system, one-off, and will still happen.

The USTA while they are very misguided, they sky is not falling and although today is 12/21 the world will not end. College tennis recruiting will continue and on occasion a once unidentified player will be discovered by a college coach who did not know they exist.

The new USTA structure will eliminate Winter National for all age groups and Spring Championship for 18s, and reduce draw size of Clay and Hard Court Championship. These events are attended by many college coaches. Thus unless our kids are highly ranked (in the new system, highly ranked in sections), they would not be able to qualify for super nationals. These missing out may be high 4 stars that many mid major college coaches would like to recruit. On the other hand, I have seen D1 coaches come to our section's 18s events to scout for players. You are right that "the sky will not fall" and college tennis recruiting will continue even if USTA were to eliminate all national events. Our kids just have to work harder on tennis training and on academics. They need also to start to contact coaches early. If a coach is really interested in our kids, they will find a way to watch our kids. In addition, we can always tape an actual match and send DVD to coaches.

[chalkflewup]

Originally Posted by tennis5

Andfor,

Now, while Chalk is a nice guy, he is a pro USTA guy.

Yes, I am a nice guy (compliment accepted). And I am pro USTA but neither of those characterizations should contribute to my post as being labeled as inaccurate or "spot on" as noted here.

And I'm referring to to the use of any junior ranking service like TennisRecruiting.net - not just USTA. Most college coaches don't Wild West it and just show up at K'ZOO and roam.

[andfor]

Originally Posted by Chemist

The new USTA structure will eliminate Winter National for all age groups and Spring Championship for 18s, and reduce draw size of Clay and Hard Court Championship. These events are attended by many college coaches. Thus unless our kids are highly ranked (in the new system, highly ranked in sections), they would not be able to qualify for super nationals. These missing out may be high 4 stars that many mid major college coaches would like to recruit. On the other hand, I have seen D1 coaches come to our section's 18s events to scout for players. You are right that "the sky will not fall" and college tennis recruiting will continue even if USTA were to eliminate all national events. Our kids just have to work harder on tennis training and on academics. They need also to start to contact coaches early. If a coach is really interested in our kids, they will find a way to watch our kids. In addition, we can always tape an actual match and send DVD to coaches.

Right. The need to contact coaches pro actively and start early is essential by most all 4 stars (depending on their schools of choice) and below. I don't see this being any different in the future as it is today.

Major and Mid-Major college coaches looking for the "diamond in the rough" will have to show up more at sectional regional tournaments now is the way I see it. But before they find the player with possible upside potential they have an idea who they are before they go to the courts.

I have a story of my own. I directly know a player who never played above a Level 4 nationals. And due to his proactive reaching out to coaches found one that gave him a tennis full ride this year. That's right a tennis full-ride. Now the scholarship offer may be rare, point is it would not have happened if the player and parents sat back and waited for this coach/program to contact them.

[tball2day]

It sounds like he did good by being proactive and was realistic about his level in choosing a college. I would assume he went in playing #1 or maybe 2 for the team if the scholarship story is true. I saw stats that the freshman boys that actually get full rides is like 3 a year, obviously low and only cause they go to schools where they play at the top. Obviously a lot of people out there exaggerating about their scholarships, cause at any tournament there is someone going on about how they have a full ride here or there. They be embarrassing themselves. (not saying your guy doing this, just in general).