|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 138
|
Had the opportunity to hit with the new Wilson Blades today and compared them with my current Donnay P1 16/19. I could only demo 2 at a time so I had the Blade 93 and 98 18x20. Next week I will try the 98 16x19.
Some background: Donnay: Strung with KB Proline II 16g, originally at 56 but down to about 52 by now. Was going to restring last night but wasn't able to. Stock with overgrip weighing in at 11.8. Blade 93: Strung at shop with NXT and probably Lux4G. I was first person to use it so it felt pretty tight, probably high 50s. 11.9 with tourna grip Blade 98: Same strings, felt a little looser, prob around 55 or so. 11.1 with tourna grip. Me: Mid 40s 4.5. Classic strokes with good technique. Aggressive baseliner with OK volleys, OHBH with probably a little more RHS on that side. Played 3 10pt TBs and several games of 11s with a very strong 4.5/low 5.0 partner. Thoughts: Blade 93: Demanding stick, too much racquet for me at my age. Obviously the strings play a big factor, but I found it a little unforgiving and difficult to generate pace. I hit better off my bh side because I swing a little faster with that stroke. On the FH I kept dumping the ball into the net and I really had to change my swing and almost just try to hit every ball as hard as I could, but obviously my consistency suffered and I just couldn't find a groove on that side. Serves were OK, good spin but lacking pace. Solid volleying racquet but only if I hit the sweetspot. Lots of control and was able to place balls almost anywhere with confidence as you might expect. Subjectively felt a little heavier than 11.9 and found it more difficult to swing towards the end of the hitting session. Blade 98 18x20: Really, really liked this racquet. It was everything I had hoped the P1 18x20 would be, I tried that stick but it just didn't click for me. On groundstrokes, I immediately found a groove on both sides, was hitting with good depth and pace without any adjustments to my strokes. Good consistent response off the strings and no shock with a very plush feel. When I first picked up the racquets and started dry swinging, the 98 felt a bit flimsy but even though it's quite a bit lighter its more even balanced than the P1 so upon actual hitting it felt much more stable than expected. Volleys were more consistent, didn't have to hit dead center on the strings every time like the 93. The P1 is a great serving racquet for me, but the 98 18x20 was very close in terms of power and spin. Thoughts: I like the P1 because as an older player, I can get a little more free power out of it and the foam filling really makes it a comfortable stick for me. My only gripes with it are that it's just a tad heavy and the power can be a little tough to tame sometimes. It plays great for me with fresh strings (full bed of KB PLII 16 at about 56-57) but when the tension drops I can get really inconsistent. Higher tension are tougher on the arm, and hybrids also feel just too powerful. I used a YT Prestige MP before and liked the control of the 18x20 but it didn't seem to have that putaway power I was looking for. I had hoped the P1 18x20 would provide that balance of control and power, but after an extensive test I just couldn't connect with it. So far I really like the Blade 98 because despite the lighter weight, it still has good stability and almost as much pop as the P1. I'm going to play some dubs with all 3 racquets tomorrow, weather permitting so will report back after that. Also going to take the Blade 98 16x19 for a spin next week and compare with the P1 and Blade 98 18x20. EDIT: Let me just add that the pj on the 93 is just awesome...the matte black with dark gray graphics looks really sharp in person...the 98 is nice too but the gloss black with chrome graphics isn't quite as striking IMO. If there was ever a racquet I would buy just based on looks alone it would be the Blade 93...lol Last edited by Yaz : 12-28-2012 at 04:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 705
|
I've played with both the new Blade 16x19 and the P1 16x19, and my arm hurt after playing with the Wilson, trying to hit with the same pace as my BLX Blade 98; the P1 was just a bit heavy after hitting for 2+ hours at a time, which I frequently do. I wish I would have kept my P1, but I will next try the new Steam (both versions).
__________________
"I filed it under H, for toy." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 322
|
If you like the P1 but want a little more control, I would suggest the YTK IG Prestige Pro. A little more controlled power than the P1, a tad heavier but more headlight makes them swing about the same. I'm probably a little slower coming around with the P1. I mainly play doubles, so the YTK IG PP is my choice. Both are incredible serving racquets. The P1 definitely has a more muted feel. I do not use a dampener on either racquet and us full poly @ 52#.
Quote:
__________________
Yonex RDis 100MP, 200MP, 300MP, VCore 100S. Pro's Pro Strings. Klippermate stringer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,713
|
Quote:
__________________
Check out my blog: http://austintennis.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 395
|
Hey Yaz!!
When you do have a chance to play with the 18 x 20, could you give more details regarding the control area!! and power level. hhhmmm maybe comfort as well comparing to the P1's. cheers mate.
__________________
Donnay Pro One 16 x 19, 340g, Black polys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 877
|
Reviews are right on the money. I demo'd the P1 18x20. Loved the solid feel but it was more sluggish than I like. I ended up buying a new Blade 18x20. Added some weight to the handle to make it more HL and it is great.
And I'm also tempted to buy a Blade 93 just for the paint job...... |
|
|
|
| sundaypunch |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by sundaypunch |
|
|
#8 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
I didn't find the B98 16/19 to have much more power than the 18/20, but I was a bit more erratic with it. I found more control and consistent response from the 18/20 with about 95%+ same power level. Compared with the P1 I felt all three were equally comfortable, with maybe just a slight edge to the Donnay. This could be due to the strings however, since the P1 was strung with kirschbaum PL2, a relatively soft poly at about 55 and the B98 demos were strung tighter with 4G/NXT hybrid. P1 was clearly the most powerful of the 3. B98 18/20 was the most controllable and predictable. In terms of spin potential I found the P1 to have the most, followed by B98 16/19 and then B98 18/20, but not by a huge margin. So for now I will be sticking to my P1s...I just love the comfortable pace and spin I'm able to generate with it. Going to play with tensions to try to maximize control. I really liked the B98 18/20 and was tempted to switch, but didn't feel like it would make a huge difference in my game like the P1 did. I may pick up a lightly used one some time down the road and try a few different string setups to see if I can optimize the feel. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,555
|
I bought the Blade 93 shortly after it was released and I thought it was pretty good. I strung it at mid tension with luxilon alu power and it had a little bit too much control for my taste. I knew what I was getting into with a mid size frame but it had too much control compared to my main racquet the babolat aero pro drive that I just play better overall with. I can hit some really nice drop shots with the Blade and the paintjob looks nice but I don't play my best with it. A lot of my shots land short, and it has this weird floating effect where the ball moves kind of slow through the air, similar to the pro staff 85. I prefer the fast, hard drop trajectory where the ball explodes through the air as with the apdc much more. As I said before, I knew what I was getting into with this racquet so I shouldn't have been surprised.
Last edited by quest01 : 01-09-2013 at 05:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,555
|
Quote:
If you have any arm or shoulder issue, I would recommend avoiding poly strings on both racquets. The only racquet I was able to get away with using poly is the Prince EXO3 Tour which is one of softest racquets I have ever hit with that isn't a Head Pro Stock. |
|
|
|
|
| parasailing |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by parasailing |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
I agree about the drop shots though, I hit the best (and only) lunging forehand first volley angled drop shot of my life playing dubs with it - heard my opponent say "what the...?" afterwards...lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,555
|
Quote:
Last edited by quest01 : 01-13-2013 at 05:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 930
|
I'm considering a switch to the 2013 Blade 18x20 from the P1 16x19.
Hitting with the P1 is sublime - great power, plow through and feel is second to none. As much as I didn't find the weigh too much at first, I had a losing percentage in league play form Sept-Dec and found myself lacking energy at the end of matches. I also find the power a little hard to control. If my footwork gets sloppy (late) or contact point is off a little, the ball sails. During the 1st outings with the Blade, the lower static weight and increased control of 18x20 are obvious. Mishits result in more shock transfer and some elbow discomfort after matches. I'm hitting heavier balls with the Blade, which surprised me; this is probably due to higher racquet head speed. It's fairly easy to switch from one to the other as the SWs are similar. I've had 2 great wins with the Blade so far and bought a 2nd. I'm hoping that, as I get more used to it, the discomfort will subside, as my hitting will adjust to the Blade.
__________________
Dunlop F 3.0 Tour 18x20 (6gm lead and leather); I think.. VS Team @54 - Lux 4G @50 will work |
|
|
|
| neverstopplaying |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by neverstopplaying |
|
|
#14 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 8,275
|
Quote:
You can't really go wrong with either. I think the largest distinction between the two is the balance difference.
__________________
Wilson Black Blade 104 - NXT Tour / Copoly at 55/51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
I found the same thing with the Blades, but I chalked it up to the demo strings which felt like they were strung in the high 50s. Are you going to adjust your tensions further to see if that softens up some of the shock? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 930
|
Quote:
I've got a 2nd Blade coming in today, and yes I will probably go even lower, as the power is very controllable. I may try VS team (50), with either 4G or Beast (46) in the crosses. Like many of us, I've hit with a lot of racquets. There's no way the Blade will ever be as smooth as a P1, but any discomfort may go away as I get more used to hitting with the Blade.
__________________
Dunlop F 3.0 Tour 18x20 (6gm lead and leather); I think.. VS Team @54 - Lux 4G @50 will work |
|
|
|
|
| neverstopplaying |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by neverstopplaying |
|
|
#17 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,326
|
Hi neverstoppedplaying,
Just wanted to throw this factiod out there since you mentioned arm discomfort. 4G is one of the very best polys for tension maintenance, but also one of the stiffest polys on the market. In fact it ranks #8 stiffest (273 lbs per in.) out of 239 polys tested. I see that you have it crossed with gut mains, but man... there are literally hundreds of better choices out there for arm sensitive peeps like you and me. I can help you narrow the field if you are interested in other options. http://twu.tennis-warehouse.com/lear...r/reporter.php Jack
__________________
(9) Donnay Pro One, 16x19 | 12.4oz, -12Pts, ~330sw Mains: Babolat Tonic Gut, X's: Red WC Mosquito Bite | 54/50 lbs. Last edited by ChicagoJack : 01-14-2013 at 11:38 PM. |
|
|
|
| ChicagoJack |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ChicagoJack |
|
|
#18 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 930
|
Quote:
I think Donnay would probably make a better Blade, but I can also look for other racquet options with similar specs - a leaded Rebel team, Radical, etc. I'm new to the feel of the 18x20 Blade and am enjoying the results.
__________________
Dunlop F 3.0 Tour 18x20 (6gm lead and leather); I think.. VS Team @54 - Lux 4G @50 will work |
|
|
|
|
| neverstopplaying |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by neverstopplaying |
|
|
#19 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
i want to string my p1 with 17g cyclone full bed. do you have any experience with this combo and what tension would you recommend for that string? thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|