• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Mid-sized racket for 16yo?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2013, 01:14 PM   #1
TheFieryFurnace2012
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Default Mid-sized racket for 16yo?

Hey!
I'm almost 17 and have been playing tennis for 4 years now (3 years in competition), for the last 2 years I have used the head speed mp 16/19 but now I am looking for a new racket. Next week I am supposed to be getting the new blade 98 18/20 but looking at the 93 version it just looks like a better racket for a player like me who wants the most control possible. Problem is I have never used a racket under 100 sq. inch and over 325 grams.
Any suggestions?
Thanks, appreciate it.
TheFieryFurnace2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
TheFieryFurnace2012
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TheFieryFurnace2012
Old 01-02-2013, 01:17 PM   #2
MikeHitsHard93
Hall Of Fame
 
MikeHitsHard93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,816
Default

Demo it before you make any purchase. That's my advice.
__________________
~Wilson BLX Pro Open~
MikeHitsHard93 is online now   Reply With Quote
MikeHitsHard93
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by MikeHitsHard93
Old 01-02-2013, 01:17 PM   #3
dyldore
Rookie
 
dyldore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: so cal
Posts: 128
Default

If you can, demo them and see which one you like more. You can speculate all you want but it comes down to which one feels better when you actually use it.
__________________
Playing since 2003. Left Handed. Western Forehand. I like to run. :)
Racket: APD. String: Still testing strings.
dyldore is offline   Reply With Quote
dyldore
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dyldore
Old 01-02-2013, 01:22 PM   #4
MikeHitsHard93
Hall Of Fame
 
MikeHitsHard93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dyldore View Post
If you can, demo them and see which one you like more. You can speculate all you want but it comes down to which one feels better when you actually use it.
Yup it makes a big difference coming from 100 to 93 when your reaching for shots or hitting volleys
__________________
~Wilson BLX Pro Open~
MikeHitsHard93 is online now   Reply With Quote
MikeHitsHard93
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by MikeHitsHard93
Old 01-02-2013, 01:25 PM   #5
Say Chi Sin Lo
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,606
Default

I'd recommend you to try other frames as well if you want "the most control possible":

Dunlop 100g series (whatever the current model is)
Head Prestige Mid (whatever the current model is)
Wilson Pro Staff 6.0 85
Wilson Pro Staff 6.1 90 BLX
Volkl Power Bridge 10 Mid

Don't worry about the weight of these frames. They should be like feather to you, or you can easily build up the strength to handle these frames.
Say Chi Sin Lo is offline   Reply With Quote
Say Chi Sin Lo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo
Old 01-02-2013, 01:26 PM   #6
TheFieryFurnace2012
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Default

Thanks, that's why 98 seems like the better option and then I can gradually move on down from there. 7 sq. inch seems like too big a jump. Anyone here used the new blade 98? Looks like a much better upgrade from the speed mp, anyone else used it?
TheFieryFurnace2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
TheFieryFurnace2012
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TheFieryFurnace2012
Old 01-02-2013, 01:29 PM   #7
TheFieryFurnace2012
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Default

Thanks Sin Lo, although I was pretty vague with the description. I am all about control but little power/spin doesn't hurt eh? Looking around the blade 98 seems like a really good all round racket, also it's wilson..they're pretty good right?
TheFieryFurnace2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
TheFieryFurnace2012
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TheFieryFurnace2012
Old 01-02-2013, 01:34 PM   #8
Say Chi Sin Lo
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFieryFurnace2012 View Post
Thanks Sin Lo, although I was pretty vague with the description. I am all about control but little power/spin doesn't hurt eh? Looking around the blade 98 seems like a really good all round racket, also it's wilson..they're pretty good right?
Well, just because it's a Wilson, doesn't mean it's a great frame. As a matter of fact, there isn't a single "great" frame out there. There are however, frames that are "more suitable" for so and so player. So it's up to you to see which frames will work with you.

If you hit the sweetspot consistently on a small demanding frame like the Prestige Mid (actually a ~89sq in frame) and the Pro Staff, there's plenty of power!
Say Chi Sin Lo is offline   Reply With Quote
Say Chi Sin Lo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo
Old 01-02-2013, 01:34 PM   #9
db10s
Hall Of Fame
 
db10s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: S. FL
Posts: 1,974
Default

Use a 95. Any of the Dunlop 200s.

Or if you are set on a true mid, the Dunlop 100
__________________
Dunlop D-Squad Member... So I'm biased towards Dunlop.
Biomimetic Max 200G x3 and a few others...
db10s is offline   Reply With Quote
db10s
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by db10s
Old 01-02-2013, 01:41 PM   #10
TheFieryFurnace2012
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Default

Don't get me wrong, I am not looking for the perfect racket (like it exists) but the 98 will be a pretty big improvement from a speed mp
TheFieryFurnace2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
TheFieryFurnace2012
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TheFieryFurnace2012
Old 01-02-2013, 01:43 PM   #11
Say Chi Sin Lo
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFieryFurnace2012 View Post
Don't get me wrong, I am not looking for the perfect racket (like it exists) but the 98 will be a pretty big improvement from a speed mp
Try it out, but I encourage you to try out some of the true midsize frames too. You might like them.

I made the switch to a midsize (i.Prestige Mid) when I was 17 and have never looked back.

Within a 2 year span from 15-17yrs old, I went from a Prince Precision Response Ti. -> Dunlop Hotmelt 200g -> i.Prestige Mid.

All 12oz+, I just enjoyed the smaller headsize more and more.

Last edited by Say Chi Sin Lo : 01-02-2013 at 01:46 PM.
Say Chi Sin Lo is offline   Reply With Quote
Say Chi Sin Lo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo
Old 01-02-2013, 01:53 PM   #12
TheFieryFurnace2012
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Default

Awesome, thanks man. Will demo both next week!
TheFieryFurnace2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
TheFieryFurnace2012
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TheFieryFurnace2012
Old 01-02-2013, 02:05 PM   #13
xAceofSpadesx
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5
Default

I like my Head Prestige Youtek MP, but to each his own. I've always liked Heads over Wilsons and Babolats.

Word of advice: Try to demo as many variants as possible. Rackets play can play very differently depending on string, tension, and even grips. If you have a coach, he could probably assist you in demo-ing a wide variety of rackets.
xAceofSpadesx is offline   Reply With Quote
xAceofSpadesx
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by xAceofSpadesx
Old 01-02-2013, 02:16 PM   #14
TheFieryFurnace2012
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Default

Yeah i've played with a few prestiges, only for a knock, I liked them but the strings were dead so I couldn't judge it properly. I hate babolats, never work for me, and have used head rackets for years..just looking for something better haha
TheFieryFurnace2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
TheFieryFurnace2012
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TheFieryFurnace2012
Old 01-03-2013, 03:35 AM   #15
quest01
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,556
Default

Yeah the Wilson blade 93 is a great racquet to try out. This is personally the racquet I use and it has a ton of control, probably the most control oriented racquet I've ever used. The blx 90 in my opinion had more power in comparison. You should definitely demo the 93, also the Darth Vader paint job is awesome.
quest01 is offline   Reply With Quote
quest01
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by quest01
Old 01-03-2013, 05:49 AM   #16
max
Hall Of Fame
 
max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Default

I think you should toss in a few midsized ones, too, to demo.

I mean, honestly, if you can put the frame on the ball at 100 inches, the difference is just not worth talking about. . . or exaggerating. You can do it.
__________________
Trustworthy - Loyal - Helpful - Friendly - Courteous - Kind - Obedient - Cheerful - Thrifty - Brave - Clean - Reverent
max is offline   Reply With Quote
max
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by max
Old 01-03-2013, 05:50 AM   #17
max
Hall Of Fame
 
max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Default

. . . isn't "The Fiery Furnace" one of those Lemony Snicket books?
__________________
Trustworthy - Loyal - Helpful - Friendly - Courteous - Kind - Obedient - Cheerful - Thrifty - Brave - Clean - Reverent
max is offline   Reply With Quote
max
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by max
Old 01-03-2013, 06:21 AM   #18
Gee
Professional
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by max View Post
I think you should toss in a few midsized ones, too, to demo.

I mean, honestly, if you can put the frame on the ball at 100 inches, the difference is just not worth talking about. . . or exaggerating. You can do it.
Going from a 100 sq inch frame to a midsize is a huge step in my opinion.

Simply rallying with a midsize frame is a whole other story than playing a match. You need to hit very cleanly with a midsize and that is much more difficult during a match. So it is important to demo racquets during matches as well.

I tell this from my own experience and I started with during the wooden era so I know how a 65 sq inch wooden frame plays. I think I wouldn't be able to play at the same level as with a 95" headsize. I was also intrigued by the feel of the Head Prestige Mid and I tried to switch several times but every time I noticed that it was just too small for my game. My slice serves and backhand were not as penetrating as with a 95" headsize. Volleys are a bit easier as well because of the more forgiveness of a MP.

So I would recommend the OP to switch to a smaller MP (95-98 inch headsize) first. When you feel that is still too big then you might take the step to a midsize. However don't make the mistake to listen to your ego that says something like to you: You should use a midsize then you're a great player!. Look at the ATP players. Most of them don't use a midsize but a headsize between 95-100" because they are able to play their best game with these ones. The racquet must complement your game!
__________________
5.0 level all-court player - Head IG Prestige MP - Head RIP Control 17 @ 24/23 kg.

Last edited by Gee : 01-03-2013 at 06:33 AM.
Gee is offline   Reply With Quote
Gee
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Gee
Old 01-03-2013, 06:32 AM   #19
sundaypunch
Professional
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gee View Post
Going from a 100 sq inch frame to a midsize is a huge step in my opinion.

Simply rallying with a midsize frame is a whole other story than playing a match. You need to hit very cleanly with a midsize and that is much more difficult during a match. So it is important to demo racquets during matches as well.

I tell this from my own experience and I started with during the wooden era so I know how a 65 sq inch wooden frame plays. I think I wouldn't be able to play at the same level as with a 95" headsize. I was also intrigued by the feel of the Head Prestige Mid and I tried to switch several times but every time I noticed that it was just too small for my game. My slice serves and backhand were not as penetrating as with a 95" headsize. Volleys are a bit easier as well because of the more forgiveness of a MP.

So I would recommend the OP to switch to a smaller MP (95-98 inch headsize) first. When you feel that is still too big then you might take the step to a midsize.
I think this is good advice. You will have an easier transition to a mid if you hit somewhat flatter. If you are playing a topspin based game from the baseline you will notice the lack of forgiveness more.

You can demo 4-racquets from TW for $20. If you can play at least a set or two with each you should have a good idea how they will work for you. If you try the Blade 98 and 93, you can also throw in a couple of 95's. A Prestige MP and Babolat Pure Storm LTD would be good choices.
sundaypunch is offline   Reply With Quote
sundaypunch
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by sundaypunch
Old 01-03-2013, 12:53 PM   #20
TheFieryFurnace2012
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Default

Yeah I really want to try the 93 now but I live in the UK and there is only one shop around (under 5 miles) that lets you demo rackets. They won't have the 93 in for a while but they have the 98 in next week which I will demo straight away. Will inform all with results.
Thanks!
TheFieryFurnace2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
TheFieryFurnace2012
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TheFieryFurnace2012
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Mid-sized racket for 16yo?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:00 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse