|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#401 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
the truth is that safin was a notorious headcase, who was sublime when he actually bothered to focus. johansson played superb that whole tournament, and was not a fluke he took his chances, unlike the players you mentioned (tsonga being compared with those three? gave me a good laugh!) you should re-watch FO 09, it was significantly faster. the courts were drier, and the balls used flew faster in the air. all this benefited federer he beat del potro in the semi-final because del potro ran out of stream/stamina. what goes around comes around, and del potro took his chances later that year at the us open since then he's had a little bit of a match up problem with federer lendl and wilander are better clay court players than federer in the respective eras they played in borg and vilas, better on the red stuff than federer, no doubt it's hard enough comparing the 80s to the 00s. early 70s i think is too far back. it's open era, yes, but compare 1972 to 1982, totally different game look at federer's early years, that is a glimpse of how he would have played in the 90s with the exception of hamburg (the low bounce saving federer from having his backhand exposed), i don't see much clay prowess federer is a fast court player, first and foremost yet the homogenized, slower surfaces benefited him due to him changing his game or did he change for the surfaces? that's another debate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#402 | ||||
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: India
Posts: 11,459
|
Quote:
tsonga when on was/is ridiculously brilliant ...(watch his AO semi-final vs nadal in 2008 or the last 4 sets vs fed @ wimbledon 2011 or even set 1.5 to sets 4 of RG vs djoker 2012 ) Quote:
and federer beat delpo because he raised his level and delpo couldn't possibly keep up that level of hitting for that long ......regardless, the courts being faster there was actually a problem for federer in that case .... Quote:
borg, absolutely ...... vilas, hell no ... I'd say fairly comparable ... it wasn't just borg he was losing to @ RG, he lost to solomon twice, noah once and got crushed by pecci Quote:
yeah, 3 consecutive finals @ monte carlo ( 2006-2008 ) and a win, 4 finals and 2 semis @ RG ; that epic match @ rome vs nadal in 2006; no claycourt prowess apart from what he did @ hamburg can't move well there, doesn't have enough patience in rallies, groundstrokes not consistent enough ......... oh wait ..... that's not federer, that's someone else ... guess who ? berasategui managed to make a RG final in the 90s with a BH that wasn't remotely anywhere comparable to federer's ....... yet people talk about fed's BH being a liability on clay ?
__________________
Becker,Edberg and Sampras would baggel him ( federer ) on fast indoor or grass more often than not. - the one and only kiki Last edited by abmk : 01-04-2013 at 06:43 AM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#403 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,650
|
So with Nadal out early, are you saying that it was not possible for the 2009 Roland Garros to have a worthy winner? Should the tournament have been stopped after Nadals loss?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#404 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 716
|
Sampras was a juggernaut...but not GOAT. Then again its almost impossible to compare gut era with poly era...its like two different epochs.
|
|
|
|
| Tennis Dunce |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Tennis Dunce |
|
|
#405 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 716
|
double post
Last edited by Tennis Dunce : 01-04-2013 at 04:36 PM. |
|
|
|
| Tennis Dunce |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Tennis Dunce |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|