• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Blade 98 16x19 2013 Short review
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 6 of 8 « First < 45 6 78 >
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2013, 12:53 PM   #101
teocem
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CheekyMullet View Post
A couple of comments on customer reviews section say that the handle is a little short for a DHBH. Care to comment?
I almost always use DHBH, I do not think it is a necessity to have a longer than normal handle for it anyway.
__________________
@Istanbul, Turkey. Wilson Blade 98 18x20 2013; Babolat VS 17 Gut @ 55/53 lbs (25/24 kg)
teocem is offline   Reply With Quote
teocem
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by teocem
Old 01-08-2013, 12:55 PM   #102
mrmo1115
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,812
Send a message via AIM to mrmo1115 Send a message via Yahoo to mrmo1115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CheekyMullet View Post
A couple of comments on customer reviews section say that the handle is a little short for a DHBH. Care to comment?
Handle does seem to be a bit short. I always overgrip it much higher though to solve that issue.
mrmo1115 is offline   Reply With Quote
mrmo1115
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by mrmo1115
Old 01-08-2013, 01:59 PM   #103
realplayer
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teocem View Post
I wonder if I will have a more forgiving stick with a larger sweetspot if I decrease the tension of 18x20. I like the control but it feels too boardy on a day that I am less than my best.
I think lowering the tension with 5 lbs and using a thinner string will solve the problem and the sweetspot definitely gets bigger.
That's what I experienced.
realplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
realplayer
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by realplayer
Old 01-08-2013, 02:05 PM   #104
teocem
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realplayer View Post
I think lowering the tension with 5 lbs and using a thinner string will solve the problem and the sweetspot definitely gets bigger.
That's what I experienced.
There is no gut thinner than I use. Any better suggestions for crosses?
__________________
@Istanbul, Turkey. Wilson Blade 98 18x20 2013; Babolat VS 17 Gut @ 55/53 lbs (25/24 kg)
teocem is offline   Reply With Quote
teocem
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by teocem
Old 01-08-2013, 02:22 PM   #105
realplayer
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teocem View Post
There is no gut thinner than I use. Any better suggestions for crosses?
Try the 18x20 first at 5-8 lbs lower than the 16x19 with the same type of strings and same gauge. Then you have an accurate and fair comparison between them.
After you know the differences between them it is time to think about strings.
At least, this is how I should do it.

Last edited by realplayer : 01-08-2013 at 02:42 PM.
realplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
realplayer
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by realplayer
Old 01-08-2013, 03:29 PM   #106
parasailing
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joun S. View Post
i checked it with my other frame.same length with pro staff 90.i think its not short for dhbh
The length of the racquet is the same as others but the handle is shorter from the butt cap to the throat. I am not sure why they did this hopefully not to save some cost.
parasailing is offline   Reply With Quote
parasailing
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by parasailing
Old 01-08-2013, 10:47 PM   #107
Joun S.
New User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: istanbul
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parasailing View Post
The length of the racquet is the same as others but the handle is shorter from the butt cap to the throat. I am not sure why they did this hopefully not to save some cost.
i mean its hendle length is same as pro staff's handle
__________________
APD 2013 / RPM blast 17 26KG
Joun S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Joun S.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Joun S.
Old 01-08-2013, 11:50 PM   #108
Broly4
Rookie
 
Broly4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 129
Default

It does run short
__________________
Dark horse
Broly4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Broly4
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Broly4
Old 01-09-2013, 01:32 AM   #109
teocem
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realplayer View Post
Try the 18x20 first at 5-8 lbs lower than the 16x19 with the same type of strings and same gauge. Then you have an accurate and fair comparison between them.
After you know the differences between them it is time to think about strings.
At least, this is how I should do it.
5-8 lbs is a lot of difference; I wonder what sort of calculation makes you quote this difference ? Some sort of formula, experience or gut feeling ? Thanks.
__________________
@Istanbul, Turkey. Wilson Blade 98 18x20 2013; Babolat VS 17 Gut @ 55/53 lbs (25/24 kg)
teocem is offline   Reply With Quote
teocem
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by teocem
Old 01-09-2013, 03:44 AM   #110
realplayer
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teocem View Post
5-8 lbs is a lot of difference; I wonder what sort of calculation makes you quote this difference ? Some sort of formula, experience or gut feeling ? Thanks.
It is from own experience and there is also a formula for it.

Check this link: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=359416

Just try it!
realplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
realplayer
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by realplayer
Old 01-09-2013, 04:13 AM   #111
fgs
Hall Of Fame
 
fgs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,036
Default

teocem,

the general rule is somewhere about 2-3kg as also previously stated by some other posters and it has to do mainly with the distance between the strings. if you take a look at two different sticks with a 16 x 19 pattern you will find out that some are spaced wider than others. the wider the spaces the higher the difference in order to obtain the same stringbedstiffness and hence have some comparable results from this point of view.
fgs is offline   Reply With Quote
fgs
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by fgs
Old 01-09-2013, 10:03 AM   #112
teocem
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fgs View Post
teocem,

the general rule is somewhere about 2-3kg as also previously stated by some other posters and it has to do mainly with the distance between the strings. if you take a look at two different sticks with a 16 x 19 pattern you will find out that some are spaced wider than others. the wider the spaces the higher the difference in order to obtain the same stringbedstiffness and hence have some comparable results from this point of view.
If instead of using 26-24 kg, I go down to 24-22 I am afraid that it will cause a tramboline effect!
__________________
@Istanbul, Turkey. Wilson Blade 98 18x20 2013; Babolat VS 17 Gut @ 55/53 lbs (25/24 kg)
teocem is offline   Reply With Quote
teocem
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by teocem
Old 01-09-2013, 10:10 AM   #113
Power Player
G.O.A.T.
 
Power Player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,562
Default

I use a DHBH and never though the handle was short. I have encountered short handles before (old Tfight 320).

I use the 18x20 prior version (same frame). I am loving Dunlop Ice at 50 and OGSM at 53. I can go tighter sometimes to 52/54.

Try this if you want an incredible control setup. Lux 4G also works great at the same tension in the mains.
__________________
🐐ing
Power Player is offline   Reply With Quote
Power Player
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Power Player
Old 01-09-2013, 12:37 PM   #114
fgs
Hall Of Fame
 
fgs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,036
Default

teocem,

if you like 26-24 on the 16mains version than you will also like 24-22 on the 18 mains version - i can assure you you have no trampoline effect (if strung with a poly, at least the mains).
fgs is offline   Reply With Quote
fgs
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by fgs
Old 01-09-2013, 01:04 PM   #115
teocem
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fgs View Post
teocem,

if you like 26-24 on the 16mains version than you will also like 24-22 on the 18 mains version - i can assure you you have no trampoline effect (if strung with a poly, at least the mains).
Babolat VS 17 Gut mains / Luxilon ALU Rough crosses ?
__________________
@Istanbul, Turkey. Wilson Blade 98 18x20 2013; Babolat VS 17 Gut @ 55/53 lbs (25/24 kg)
teocem is offline   Reply With Quote
teocem
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by teocem
Old 01-09-2013, 01:08 PM   #116
fgs
Hall Of Fame
 
fgs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,036
Default

no trampoline for sure!
fgs is offline   Reply With Quote
fgs
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by fgs
Old 01-09-2013, 05:06 PM   #117
skeeter
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 346
Default

Anyone played with gut mains and poly or co-poly crosses on the new Blade yet? I just received the new 18x20 and normally play with gut/poly hybrid on my racquets, so interested if anyone's tried this yet, and any tension recommendations.
skeeter is offline   Reply With Quote
skeeter
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by skeeter
Old 01-09-2013, 06:41 PM   #118
parasailing
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skeeter View Post
Anyone played with gut mains and poly or co-poly crosses on the new Blade yet? I just received the new 18x20 and normally play with gut/poly hybrid on my racquets, so interested if anyone's tried this yet, and any tension recommendations.
Only on the 16x19 version with tension around 55lbs on gut mains and 50lbs on poly cross. My usual setup is 58/52 but the recent 40s degree day temperatures had me drop it by a few lbs to reduce the stiffness.
parasailing is offline   Reply With Quote
parasailing
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by parasailing
Old 01-09-2013, 07:46 PM   #119
mrmo1115
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,812
Send a message via AIM to mrmo1115 Send a message via Yahoo to mrmo1115
Default

^ PS ever play the Donnay 97 Pro One? Specs look pretty enticing.
mrmo1115 is offline   Reply With Quote
mrmo1115
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by mrmo1115
Old 01-09-2013, 08:10 PM   #120
parasailing
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmo1115 View Post
^ PS ever play the Donnay 97 Pro One? Specs look pretty enticing.
Spec looks good but tried it out and not really impressed with Donnay in general. I tried out a lot of their different model racquets and the Pro One was the best of all the Donnays but still no match for the PSTGT.

When I hit with it, my tennis partner told me to stick with the PSTGT and he was using one of the old school Agassi Donnay's . He said I hit a heavier ball with the PSTGT.
parasailing is offline   Reply With Quote
parasailing
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by parasailing
Reply
Page 6 of 8 « First < 45 6 78 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Blade 98 16x19 2013 Short review

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse