Does Nadal's 2010 USO feel empty?

[nikdom]

He didn't have to beat Roger who won there so many times.

[smoledman]

No - because Nadal was never blocked by Federer from winning US Opens.

[augustobt]

Yes, it feels empty because he won against Novak 1.0 and have the weakest draw ever.

[nikdom]

Oh come on guys, as long as we are entertaining stupid threads, please support this one too. Let's aim for 10 pages.

[tusharlovesrafa]

Originally Posted by nikdom

Oh come on guys, as long as we are entertaining stupid threads, please support this one too. Let's aim for 10 pages.

No one cares about your thread anyway..

[nikdom]

Originally Posted by tusharlovesrafa

No one cares about your thread anyway..

Thanks. Now can you make a few more non sensical posts here in your awesome English? It'll really help the "discussion" we seem to be having on this forum these days.

[tusharlovesrafa]

Originally Posted by nikdom

Thanks. Now can you make a few more non sensical posts here in your awesome English? It'll really help the "discussion" we seem to be having on this forum these days.

Who cares about English on these threads.It's just about posting some meaningful facts and telling the world that Fed played in a weak era.

[nikdom]

Originally Posted by tusharlovesrafa

Who cares about English on these threads.It's just about posting some meaningful facts and telling the world that Fed played in a weak era.

Right, right. Can you please elaborate on the weak Fed era theory? Haven't heard that one before.

How can Fed era be weak when he had to play a doped up Nadal? I thought the whole point of doping was to get strong, no?

[tusharlovesrafa]

Originally Posted by nikdom

Right, right. Can you please elaborate on the weak Fed era theory? Haven't heard that one before.

How can Fed era be weak when he had to play a doped up Nadal? I thought the whole point of doping was to get strong, no?

Right there,do you have any conclusive evidence to prove that Rafa doped?

[Dark Magician]

Originally Posted by nikdom

He didn't have to beat Roger who won there so many times.

Neither does any other FO, coz as we have come to know Fed is a mug compared to Nadal. He is 2-8 in GS and 10-18 total which means Nadal hasnt faced anyone good enough in FO. Isnt that hollow too. (sorry couldnt resist )

[nikdom]

Originally Posted by tusharlovesrafa

Right there,do you have any conclusive evidence to prove that Rafa doped?

Why is he serving a ban then?

[tusharlovesrafa]

Originally Posted by nikdom

Why is he serving a ban then?

Do u have any evidence to prove that he is serving a silent ban?

[nikdom]

Originally Posted by tusharlovesrafa

Do u have any evidence to prove that he is serving the silent ban?

Do you have any conclusive evidence that he is injured?

[Magnus]

Absolutley. Nadal had the weakest draw to the final I've ever seen. He basically played one match and that was the final.

[Monsieur_DeLarge]

Originally Posted by tusharlovesrafa

Right there,do you have any conclusive evidence to prove that Rafa doped?

Originally Posted by tusharlovesrafa

Rafael Nadal will make a stunning comeback (because a Mumbai astrologer with a ****poor record of predicting things correctly said so)

"O would some power the giftie gie us to see ourselves as others see us..."


Regards,
MDL

[tusharlovesrafa]

Originally Posted by nikdom

Do you have any conclusive evidence that he is injured?

Innocent until proven guilty..If you go by that logic,how do u have know fed has won 17 grand slams? What if aliens from outer space used nano technology to give us an illusion of fed winning so many titles?

[nikdom]

Originally Posted by tusharlovesrafa

Innocent until proven guilty..If you go by that logic,how do u have know fed has won 17 grand slams?What if aliens from outer space used nano technology to give us an illusion of fed winning so many titles?

I asked how you are sure he's injured? What's that got to do with innocence and guilt, unless you're admitting he is lying.

No one saw him get injured. In fact he played well against Rosol and lost, running around until the very end. Since then he has been enjoying life, fishing, golfing, even practicing tennis, but somehow pulls out of AO with a 'stomach bug' 4 weeks prior?

[Monsieur_DeLarge]

Originally Posted by nikdom

...

I admire your persistence; continuing a conversation with someone whose idea of debating is "Roger Federer is GOAT because aliens are hypnotising us".

Let it die, nikdom. The AO's on now, we don't need this stuff any more.


Regards,
MDL

[nikdom]

Originally Posted by Monsieur_DeLarge

I admire your persistence; continuing a conversation with someone whose idea of debating is "Roger Federer is GOAT because aliens are hypnotising us".

Let it die, nikdom. The AO's on now, we don't need this stuff any more.


Regards,
MDL

Thanks MDL, but I can't sleep and they're showing a boring Venus match on TV. Waiting for the Djoko Harrison match. Tushar is keeping me entertained.

[tusharlovesrafa]

Originally Posted by nikdom

I asked how you are sure he's injured? What's that got to do with innocence and guilt, unless you're admitting he is lying.

No one saw him get injured. In fact he played well against Rosol and lost, running around until the very end. Since then he has been enjoying life, fishing, golfing, even practicing tennis, but somehow pulls out of AO with a 'stomach bug' 4 weeks prior?

How do you *see* someone getting injured? I accept he lost to Rosol face and square,but that doesn't change the face that nadal was injured.

PS:Just ate my lunch,Lentils,chapatis and Rice,nothing better than that..