• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Strings
Reload this Page Ball Pocketing, Dwell Time, Spin Potential
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 4 of 4 « First < 23 4
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2013, 03:38 AM   #61
mxmx
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlm View Post
Okay Jack fair enough, I just get hooked on the great spin I get with a kevlar main and poly cross. But more than that this set up plays so much more consistent than a full poly job does.

I love poly when it is fresh, but it come nowhere near kevlar when it comes to maintaining pinpoint control with its built in restricted flight even after a few hours of use. I hit a high trajectory with a lot of top spin and when the poly starts to lose some tension I have a harder time with shots going long.

And even though I know kevlar loses tension quickly it does not lose its control anywhere near as quick as poly does. I am still experimenting with different poly set ups and hoping to find one that works. Because I would like to get away from the kevlar its stiffness can be hard on the arm. But like I mentioned its unmatched control and pinpoint accuracy is addicting.

By the way what club do you play out of, I play in the suburbs out of Park Forest and Homewood.
TLM
Great thread people....what I was looking for...

My question would be: When kevlar loses its tension, does it increase in power?
My experience of kevlar is that the older it gets, the rougher and looser the actual strings get, and the spin increases. Power, I am not sure. To me poly is great on flat shots, but not as great as kevlar with spin. Could anyone concur?
mxmx is offline   Reply With Quote
mxmx
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by mxmx
Old 01-24-2013, 05:59 AM   #62
tennisnut123
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pvaudio View Post
It's very odd. It's like it's braided almost. It's kinda lumpy rather than rough.

Yeah, its definitely a strange feel...It's almost like they took alu power, and just cut small crevices into the string, somewhat like little spiral notches.
tennisnut123 is offline   Reply With Quote
tennisnut123
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tennisnut123
Old 01-24-2013, 07:03 AM   #63
tennisnut123
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 90
Default

A lot of this is way over my head lol...But, for a While i was using the Kblade 98...Strung with Wilson Nat gut @ 56 lbs mains/Tec Black code @ 54 lbs cross. I had tried doing the same tension with the wilson nat gut mains and lux alu rough cross, but felt like the ball had a trampoline effect when making contact, and that same effect never happened with the black code. I used this hybrid for a few years and still like it to this day, but switched to all black code. Could you help me understand some possible reasons why i would have liked the black code hybrid more, based off of the information that you've provided previously? I currently string rackets for two different places and I string quite a bit, but still learning about the science of it all...so i find this quite interesting. Thanks Audio or whoever can enlighten me on this.
tennisnut123 is offline   Reply With Quote
tennisnut123
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tennisnut123
Old 01-25-2013, 12:30 AM   #64
mxmx
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennisnut123 View Post
A lot of this is way over my head lol...But, for a While i was using the Kblade 98...Strung with Wilson Nat gut @ 56 lbs mains/Tec Black code @ 54 lbs cross. I had tried doing the same tension with the wilson nat gut mains and lux alu rough cross, but felt like the ball had a trampoline effect when making contact, and that same effect never happened with the black code. I used this hybrid for a few years and still like it to this day, but switched to all black code. Could you help me understand some possible reasons why i would have liked the black code hybrid more, based off of the information that you've provided previously? I currently string rackets for two different places and I string quite a bit, but still learning about the science of it all...so i find this quite interesting. Thanks Audio or whoever can enlighten me on this.
For me on the kblade 98, the most success I had stringwise, was the thinner babolat pro hurricane (white)....second place was the pro hurricane tour (yellow)
I am not sure why though....the blade was also the lightest on strings compared to all my other rackets.
mxmx is offline   Reply With Quote
mxmx
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by mxmx
Reply
Page 4 of 4 « First < 23 4

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Strings
Reload this Page Ball Pocketing, Dwell Time, Spin Potential

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse