|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 268
|
I want to buy a Wimbledon VEM 15 racquet (labelled 88 sq.in.). At first i thought it was midsize, but after reading this post (http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showt...ight=Wimbledon), i doubted if it was midplus.
BTW, dose anyone know something about this racquet compared to HM-88?Their shape almost looks identical. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 268
|
i finally bought this racquet and find its headsize falls between 90 and 95 square inches. perhaps 93, i guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, hook 'em, Texas
Posts: 2,033
|
Like the liberty taken with the Prince '90' and '110' and the early Black Ace having '98' on it, the Wimbledon 88 and 98 made reference to the series rather than an absolute measurement of the head size, I reckon.
We sold a ton of the HM series back in the late '80s. I played the Eclipse Expert 88 in '91 or so...great racket. I do wonder what the VEM 15 designation refers to. I'm not familiar with that model. Easy for me to say; but, how about some pics ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 268
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() Last edited by Roadway : 01-25-2013 at 07:41 AM. Reason: delete unclear image |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 268
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 268
|
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,509
|
Yes, I believe those "88" Wimbledons are actually a bit larger.
And that VEM 15 is from the same mold as the more common white HM88.
__________________
Psalm 100:4 |
|
|
|
| retrowagen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by retrowagen |
|
|
#8 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 268
|
Quote:
BTW, the Graphite Edges from you are so perfect. I replaced the grommets and stringed it at 60 lbs with multis. They play very well. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 562
|
what about the all pro oversize? What's the head size? 107, 110?
__________________
In the end, the only thing a new racquet will do for you is make you suck in a different way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 1,934
|
Quote:
i played the all-pro and they eventually started replacing cracked frames with the GK-98. pretty much the same. initially the all pro was 80/20 then switched to 90/10. I can't recall the composition of the GK-98. edit: as i recall.....this was mid-late 80's, my HS tennis years. The All-Pro was a cheap answer to the POG. I think the All-Pro may have been a tad smaller. They also made a Boron Pro, competing with the Prince Boron at half the price. Then abit later they started into the midsize market, Flack and Seguso, etc. These were made by PK, as i recall. They were nice frames at a decent price point.
__________________
I got some rackets, and I got a stringer. Last edited by tbuggle : 01-30-2013 at 09:20 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,509
|
Quote:
__________________
Psalm 100:4 |
|
|
|
|
| retrowagen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by retrowagen |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 1,934
|
Quote:
10 char
__________________
I got some rackets, and I got a stringer. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|