Is Djokovic an all-time great? - Page 21

The-Champ · 01-25-2013, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5555

You failed to answer why tennis experts disagree who is greater player between Ivan Lendl and Pancho Gonzales. Tennis experts disagree who is greater between Lendl and Gonzales because they can not agree what should be criteria for greatness. It's logic.

You lost the argument.

According to you one can argue Donald Young is greater than Pete Sampras. Greatness is nothing but opinion.

we get your logic now!!

You are not winning anything, you're just embarrassing yourself.

volleygirl · 01-25-2013, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The-Champ

According to you one can argue Donald Young is greater than Pete Sampras. Greatness is nothing but opinion.

we get your logic now!!

You are not winning anything, you're just embarrassing yourself.

Donald Young wouldnt wear his hat sideways if he wasnt awesome.

TMF · 01-25-2013, 10:36 AM

Is 5555 the all-time greatest poster?

Can someone prove it.

5555 · 01-26-2013, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix1983

Can you prove it's not?

Burden of proof is on person who makes allegation of fact, so he has to prove it's a fact.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jokinla

Is that a fact or your opinion.

Fact.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Povl Carstensen

You outargued yourself long ago.

How do you mean? Explain.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The-Champ

According to you one can argue Donald Young is greater than Pete Sampras. Greatness is nothing but opinion.

we get your logic now!!

You are not winning anything, you're just embarrassing yourself.

According to your logic, it's a fact that Ivan Lendl is greater player
than Pancho Gonzales (or vice versa). Stop embarrassing yourself.

Yes, I won.

5555 · 01-28-2013, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix1983

Djokovic is not an all-time great. This is a fact.

I'm going to ask you just one more time: can you prove it's a fact? If you do not provide proof you will lose the argument.

Wilander Fan · 01-28-2013, 07:18 AM

I would say yes now. He is on the second tier with Edberg/Becker/Wilander. Not there with Lendl/Samprass/Connors/Agassi/....and not there with Fed.

tennis_pro · 01-28-2013, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5555

I'm going to ask you just one more time: can you prove it's a fact? If you do not provide proof you will lose the argument.

Can you prove that Donald Young is NOT the GOAT? If you don't have any evidence, then you lost the arguement.

Phoenix1983 · 01-28-2013, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5555

I'm going to ask you just one more time: can you prove it's a fact? If you do not provide proof you will lose the argument.

Define 'proof'. Or 'fact' for that matter.

For all you know, you could be living in a 'Matrix'-style fantasy world and nothing could be real.

Cup8489 · 01-28-2013, 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix1983

Define 'proof'. Or 'fact' for that matter.

For all you know, you could be living in a 'Matrix'-style fantasy world and nothing could be real.

He's in a fantasy world, all right.

TMF · 01-28-2013, 08:30 AM

Well 5555 is going to comeback and say you can't prove his Matrix world is real or fantasy.

You lost the argument.

Cup8489 · 01-28-2013, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMF

Well 5555 is going to comeback and say you can't prove his Matrix world is real or fantasy.

You lost the argument.

You can't lose an argument to someone who can't MAKE an argument.

Povl Carstensen · 01-28-2013, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5555

How do you mean? Explain.

I posted examples of your selfcontradictory statements. You do the math, and if you are not able to, too bad for you. Either way, you are the loser big time.

jokinla · 01-28-2013, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cup8489

He's in a fantasy world, all right.

BAHAHAHAHA, Cup 1, 5555 ZERO!!!!!!! Fact.

5555 · 01-29-2013, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tennis_pro

Can you prove that Donald Young is NOT the GOAT? If you don't have any evidence, then you lost the arguement.

Why I must prove that Young is the GOAT?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix1983

Define 'proof'. Or 'fact' for that matter.

For all you know, you could be living in a 'Matrix'-style fantasy world and nothing could be real.

definition of "proof" http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dic...kiePolicy=true
definition of "fact" http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dic...kiePolicy=true

Can you prove it's a fact that Djokovic is not an all-time great?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Povl Carstensen

I posted examples of your selfcontradictory statements. You do the math, and if you are not able to, too bad for you.

Can you provide reasoning as to why the posts are contradictory? Yes or no?

Quote:

Either way, you are the looser big time.

If you, in your next reply, provide reasoning as to why the are posts contradictory, and then I fail to refute your argument, I will be the looser. As of now, that's not the case.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jokinla

BAHAHAHAHA, Cup 1, 5555 ZERO!!!!!!! Fact.

Can you prove it's a fact?

chatt_town · 01-29-2013, 07:03 AM

Barring injury...he's certainly headed that way. I'm thinking in the next two years, he will have at least 10 and he will be what...27. I also think he will easily pass Nadal by the time his career is over. Nadal is done for the most part. He might have one more French left but I don't know about that.

QUOTE=5555;7031744]"Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic, Roddick's chief rivals, may very well be the greatest three players to ever play tennis"
Andre Agassi
http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/men-...ourt-champions

"At the moment Andy is probably playing against three of the top eight players in the history of the game".
Tim Henman
http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/wimb...s-7876173.html

"1. Federer
2. Borg
3. Sampras
4. McEnroe
5. Nadal
6. Djokovic
7. Agassi
8. Connors
9. Lendl
10. Edberg "
Rod Laver's TOP 10 at Open Era
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/archives...654969?page=12

"Novak has been phenomenal, winning the Australian Open, Wimbledon and the US Open and getting to the semis at Roland Garros. That puts him right up there alongside the best who have ever played."
Pat Cash
http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/879710-...-says-pat-cash

"This guy surely now has a genuine claim to be labelled as one of the all-time greats."
Jonathan Overend
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/tennis/16781690

"It's obviously great any time you beat the world No. 1. I just tried to do some of the same things I did in Australia. I was very close there against one of the greatest players ever.."
Andy Murray
http://www.espn.co.uk/tennis/sport/story/139046.html#[/quote]

tennis_pro · 01-29-2013, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5555

Why I must prove that Young is the GOAT?

Because I think that he is. Prove me he's not. And....

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5555

If you do not provide proof you will lose the argument.

Povl Carstensen · 01-29-2013, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5555

Can you provide reasoning as to why the posts are contradictory? Yes or no?
If you, in your next reply, provide reasoning as to why the are posts contradictory, and then I fail to refute your argument, I will be the looser. As of now, that's not the case.[/b]?

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5555

You agree with The-Champ that criteria for greatness is not a matter of opinion?

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5555

Opinion can be false

If an opinion can be false, it is not really a matter of opinion. You're outta here a long time ago. Stop wasting peoples time.

kalyan4fedever · 01-29-2013, 07:36 AM

Djoker is a mega pusher who is lucky that he is winning in this slow courts and is indeed playing in the weakest era with fed out of his prime, rafa struggling with injuries and murray being a choker. If he is playing in 90's courts or in prime fed period he would be having 0 slams..Rack up man rack up till your luck runs out.

TennisCJC · 01-29-2013, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wilander Fan

I would say yes now. He is on the second tier with Edberg/Becker/Wilander. Not there with Lendl/Samprass/Connors/Agassi/....and not there with Fed.

Sounds about right.

Gonzo_style · 01-29-2013, 08:42 AM

Fact:

Novak Djokovic AO 2013 Champion

01-25-2013, 10:36 AM	#403
TMF G.O.A.T. Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 13,951	Is 5555 the all-time greatest poster? Can someone prove it. __________________ NadalAgassi: I think Serena's final slam tally will be something from 18-27. My best guess is 24 or 25 though; Nole(2010) will never win Wimbledon

01-28-2013, 08:30 AM	#410
TMF G.O.A.T. Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 13,951	Well 5555 is going to comeback and say you can't prove his Matrix world is real or fantasy. You lost the argument. __________________ NadalAgassi: I think Serena's final slam tally will be something from 18-27. My best guess is 24 or 25 though; Nole(2010) will never win Wimbledon

01-29-2013, 07:36 AM	#418
kalyan4fedever Hall Of Fame Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 1,694	Djoker is a mega pusher who is lucky that he is winning in this slow courts and is indeed playing in the weakest era with fed out of his prime, rafa struggling with injuries and murray being a choker. If he is playing in 90's courts or in prime fed period he would be having 0 slams..Rack up man rack up till your luck runs out. __________________ Aham brahmAsmi

01-29-2013, 08:42 AM	#420
Gonzo_style Hall Of Fame Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 2,345	Fact: Novak Djokovic AO 2013 Champion __________________ "You are not special. You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake. You're the same decaying organic matter as everything else." - Durden

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode