• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Doubles GOAT ?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 2 of 10 < 1 2 34 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-29-2013, 10:07 AM   #21
pc1
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7,145
Default

Guys,

I'm not sure if Rosewall is the singles or doubles GOAT but honestly if he isn't, he isn't that far off.

Lots of great doubles players like McEnroe, Rosewall, Emerson, Newcombe, Hewitt just over the last few decades.
pc1 is offline   Reply With Quote
pc1
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pc1
Old 01-29-2013, 10:36 AM   #22
BobbyOne
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pc1 View Post
Guys,

I'm not sure if Rosewall is the singles or doubles GOAT but honestly if he isn't, he isn't that far off.

Lots of great doubles players like McEnroe, Rosewall, Emerson, Newcombe, Hewitt just over the last few decades.
Thanks, pc1 for this support. Rosewall's number of 24 doubles majors is really impressive. He should be ranked as a GOAT candidate. He won those titles with 7 partners: Hoad, Stolle, Gonzalez, Laver, Ralston, Anderson and Davidson. At Wembley Muscles won seven doubles titles.

Last edited by BobbyOne : 01-29-2013 at 10:38 AM.
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
BobbyOne
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BobbyOne
Old 01-29-2013, 01:01 PM   #23
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolbo View Post
+ Haarhuis (54 doubles titles) / Eltingh (44 doubles titles)
that is right.I forgot them.

A great doubles team was also Hlasek-Forget.

On clay, I´d also mention Gildemeister/Gomez and Bertolucci/Panatta and later on, Casal/sanchez

There were guys that succeded with many different partners, but never changed side.Rosewall,Emerson,Stolle,Okker,Fibak,Edmondson ,Jarryd,Fitzegerald,Witskedt,Forget...
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70´s and 80´s" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 01-29-2013, 01:03 PM   #24
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyOne View Post
kiki, Yes, the Aussies were awesome in doubles. I even omitted Rosewall/Stolle, Alexander/Dent and Case/Masters.
Loved Rosewall-Stolle.The short guy with the genious brains and the lanky, adaptable, big server and tall Stolle.Great contrast.

The two teams I really would have love to see are Bromwich-Quist and Mc Gregor-Sedgman.

Mervyn Rose and Lewis Hoad were also great with different teammates.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70´s and 80´s" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 01-29-2013, 01:17 PM   #25
donnayblack99
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: On the court
Posts: 41
Default

Bryan Bros are now the undisputed GOAT... 13 Majors. Nuff said.
__________________
Volkl PB 10 w/ Cyclone 18g@50 lbs. 5.5 NTRP... NCAA DIV 1 Singles
donnayblack99 is offline   Reply With Quote
donnayblack99
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by donnayblack99
Old 01-29-2013, 01:51 PM   #26
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,476
Default

what about ladies?

Many remember the great teams like Navy and Shriver/King, Casals and King/Evert, Stove and Turnbull, Jordan and Smith.I recall also Hingis and Kurnikova as well as the Williamses, the last two great teams.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70´s and 80´s" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 01-29-2013, 03:07 PM   #27
hoodjem
Legend
 
hoodjem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 9,957
Default

Don't forget the Woodies.
__________________
The smart man thinks he knows a lot; the wise man is aware that he knows little.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote
hoodjem
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by hoodjem
Old 01-29-2013, 03:20 PM   #28
BobbyOne
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by donnayblack99 View Post
Bryan Bros are now the undisputed GOAT... 13 Majors. Nuff said.
Not enough said: Hoad/Rosewall have 15 majors...
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
BobbyOne
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BobbyOne
Old 01-29-2013, 03:23 PM   #29
Dan Lobb
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyOne View Post
Not enough said: Hoad/Rosewall have 15 majors...
And Hoad/Rosewall only played a few years together.
Hoad spent a lot of time paired with Hartwig, Fraser, Anderson and in 1959 was awsesome with Trabert.
Dan Lobb is online now   Reply With Quote
Dan Lobb
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Dan Lobb
Old 01-29-2013, 03:23 PM   #30
BobbyOne
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,292
Default

A little correction of one of my posts: Rosewall won doubles majors with eight partners. I forgot Sedgman...
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
BobbyOne
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BobbyOne
Old 01-29-2013, 04:29 PM   #31
BobbyOne
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
Loved Rosewall-Stolle.The short guy with the genious brains and the lanky, adaptable, big server and tall Stolle.Great contrast.

The two teams I really would have love to see are Bromwich-Quist and Mc Gregor-Sedgman.

Mervyn Rose and Lewis Hoad were also great with different teammates.
kiki, Yes, Stolle was adaptable: He made a great duo with Hewitt, then with Emerson, then with Laver in 1967 as a pro and at last with Rosewall. Four great doubles.

Rose played with Hartwig and Don Candy, Hoad played of course with Rosewall, also with Hartwig and Trabert.

Interesting: Hoad won the French Pro doubles seven times in a row.

Last edited by BobbyOne : 01-29-2013 at 05:25 PM.
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
BobbyOne
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BobbyOne
Old 01-29-2013, 05:50 PM   #32
Dan Lobb
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyOne View Post
kiki, Yes, Stolle was adaptable: He made a great duo with Hewitt, then with Emerson, then with Laver in 1967 as a pro and at last with Rosewall. Four great doubles.

Rose played with Hartwig and Don Candy, Hoad played of course with Rosewall, also with Hartwig and Trabert.

Interesting: Hoad won the French Pro doubles seven times in a row.
Hoad had good results on clay.
In 1972, in the Italian Open doubles final, Hoad and Frew McMillan led Nastase/Tiriac two sets to love, but eventually lost the match, uncompleted by darkness.
Dan Lobb is online now   Reply With Quote
Dan Lobb
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Dan Lobb
Old 01-29-2013, 06:13 PM   #33
BobbyOne
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Lobb View Post
Hoad had good results on clay.
In 1972, in the Italian Open doubles final, Hoad and Frew McMillan led Nastase/Tiriac two sets to love, but eventually lost the match, uncompleted by darkness.
Dan, Please explain how they lost a match which was uncompleted. No irony intended.

Last edited by BobbyOne : 01-29-2013 at 06:19 PM.
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
BobbyOne
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BobbyOne
Old 01-29-2013, 07:40 PM   #34
pc1
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7,145
Default

Actually when you think about it Rosewall has the perfect strokes for doubles. His serve was fine but not overpowering but in doubles he could serve and come in with abandon because he's covering half the court. His volley was very strong, among the best in history. He had a super return. His overhead was top notch. He was consistent and almost never off. And like all top doubles players, he knew how to play the angles.

I think McEnroe is clearly the best since the late 1970's and perhaps of all time along with a few others.
pc1 is offline   Reply With Quote
pc1
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pc1
Old 01-29-2013, 07:43 PM   #35
BTURNER
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: OREGON
Posts: 2,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
what about ladies?

Many remember the great teams like Navy and Shriver/King, Casals and King/Evert, Stove and Turnbull, Jordan and Smith.I recall also Hingis and Kurnikova as well as the Williamses, the last two great teams.
Lets replace Evert with Gigi Fernandez who won twice as many doubles titles at 69, and

Wiki ...Fernández won a non-calendar year doubles Grand Slam with 17 Grand Slam women's doubles title – six French Open, five US Open, four Wimbledon, and two Australian Open winning at least one Grand Slam title every year from 1988–1997, except 1989, and for three straight years winning three of the four Grand Slam doubles titles in the same year (1992–1994). She won 14 of her 17 Grand Slam titles partnering Natasha Zvereva; their partnership is the second most successful doubles pair in Grand Slam history after Martina Navratilova and Pam Shriver in the Open era.[4]...

Evert won....drumrole please....3.
BTURNER is offline   Reply With Quote
BTURNER
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BTURNER
Old 01-29-2013, 10:03 PM   #36
Dan Lobb
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyOne View Post
Dan, Please explain how they lost a match which was uncompleted. No irony intended.
Hoad and McMillan were upset about the strange on-court antics of Nastase and Tiriac, who managed to disrupt the progress of the match.
At 5 to 3 in the fifth set, darkness was beginning to interfere with the match, so the umpire halted play and declared the Rumanians the winners.
Yes, very strange.
But, the match was in Italy, and the Rumanians were like the home players, the crowd favourites.
Dan Lobb is online now   Reply With Quote
Dan Lobb
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Dan Lobb
Old 01-29-2013, 10:05 PM   #37
Dan Lobb
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pc1 View Post
Actually when you think about it Rosewall has the perfect strokes for doubles. His serve was fine but not overpowering but in doubles he could serve and come in with abandon because he's covering half the court. His volley was very strong, among the best in history. He had a super return. His overhead was top notch. He was consistent and almost never off. And like all top doubles players, he knew how to play the angles.

I think McEnroe is clearly the best since the late 1970's and perhaps of all time along with a few others.
Frew McMillan, like Laver, rated Hoad's volleys as the best ever, with the minimum of motion, maximum power, sharp angles.
Dan Lobb is online now   Reply With Quote
Dan Lobb
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Dan Lobb
Old 01-29-2013, 10:06 PM   #38
TMF
G.O.A.T.
 
TMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyOne View Post
robow7, We cannot compare a Newcombe-Roche team with Bryan-Bryan because, as you say, nowadays the best players don't play doubles anymore.
The best single players doesn't necessary means they will also be the best players in double. While the Bryan brothers aren't that good in single, but no top singles are going to beat them. It's not just about skills, but good team player, good chemistry, communication. If you insinuating today's double are weak(sigh), you're wrong.
__________________
NadalAgassi: I think Serena's final slam tally will be something from 18-27. My best guess is 24 or 25 though; Nole(2010) will never win Wimbledon
TMF is online now   Reply With Quote
TMF
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TMF
Old 01-29-2013, 10:09 PM   #39
Dan Lobb
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TMF View Post
The best single players doesn't necessary means they will also be the best players in double. While the Bryan brothers aren't that good in single, but no top singles are going to beat them. It's not just about skills, but good team player, good chemistry, communication. If you insinuating today's double are weak(sigh), you're wrong.
Team play, chemistry, communication? Sounds like you are referring to Hoad/Rosewall, who won 15 major doubles titles, more than the Bryans.
Dan Lobb is online now   Reply With Quote
Dan Lobb
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Dan Lobb
Old 01-29-2013, 10:14 PM   #40
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Lobb View Post
Hoad had good results on clay.
In 1972, in the Italian Open doubles final, Hoad and Frew McMillan led Nastase/Tiriac two sets to love, but eventually lost the match, uncompleted by darkness.
Lew&Frew: fantastic mixture of power&finesse
Same as Hoad&Santana.They beat Laver&Gimeno, great line up
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70´s and 80´s" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Reply
Page 2 of 10 < 1 2 34 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Doubles GOAT ?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:00 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse