Other than playing NADAL, FED has never done so much running!

[djokovic2008]

No wonder instead of looking 31 vs Murray he looked 41. Fed has never been used to being jerked left to right except when playing nadal and we all know how that ends up. Now with Murray and djoker fed has to do this more regulary on a hardcourt clay and grass and he cannot handle it even if he was 23. At FO12 djoker beat him straight sets then in the Olympics after fed looked more refreshed he had no gas vs Murray and YES he wanted to win. It's one thing schooling tomic raonic and tsonga but against a fit nadal Murray and djoker unless grass on a hot day it's all she wrote.

[tennisaddict]

Butt hurt..

17 > 1.

17 > 6.

17 > 11.

If you knew the game decently, you will know 6 years age difference is huge at the top level. There is no shame in losing in 5 sets at age 31 to a world No 3. Stop whining Baby.

[djokovic2008]

Originally Posted by tennisaddict

Butt hurt..

17 > 1.

17 > 6.

17 > 11.

If you knew the game decently, you will know 6 years age difference is huge at the top level. There is no shame in losing in 5 sets at age 31 to a world No 3. Stop whining Baby.

Lol stop whining about six years it's pathetic and know one buys it, how insecure with the slam count lol.

[NatF]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Lol stop whining about six years it's pathetic and know one buys it, how insecure with the slam count lol.

You clearly know nothing about modern tennis if you think 6 years at the top level is nothing.

[Cup8489]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Lol stop whining about six years it's pathetic and know one buys it, how insecure with the slam count lol.

Actually many experts mention it fairly often. I know it sucks to know that Djokovic isn't as good as Federer; I know it bothers you, but try to undestand that's just the way things are.

[zagor]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

No wonder instead of looking 31 vs Murray he looked 41. Fed has never been used to being jerked left to right except when playing nadal and we all know how that ends up. Now with Murray and djoker fed has to do this more regulary on a hardcourt clay and grass and he cannot handle it even if he was 23. At FO12 djoker beat him straight sets then in the Olympics after fed looked more refreshed he had no gas vs Murray and YES he wanted to win. It's one thing schooling tomic raonic and tsonga but against a fit nadal Murray and djoker unless grass on a hot day it's all she wrote.

Eh, that's speculation (also it's couldn't have handled it BTW), Fed isn't 23 (in fact he's almost a decade older) so we'll never know, I mean you can be sure of it JV but it's impossible to prove and you're hardly the most unbiased source now.

We'll see how Nadal will do at 31-32 and compare, should be very interesting.

[tennisaddict]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Lol stop whining about six years it's pathetic and know one buys it, how insecure with the slam count lol.

what is insecurity there ? It is a fact.

Open a thread about Federer being made to run around when Novak or Murray get to 17. Till such time , go and suck your pacifier.

[zagor]

Originally Posted by Cup8489

Actually many experts mention it fairly often. I know it sucks to know that Djokovic isn't as good as Federer; I know it bothers you, but try to undestand that's just the way things are.

For the last time, he's not a Novak fan.

[TMF]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Lol stop whining about six years it's pathetic and know one buys it, how insecure with the slam count lol.

6 years is a lot for tennis. This is not golf.

[djokovic2008]

Looks like the bait attracted a few fish, I'm gonna love when Murray and djoker hit 31 and still in great condition making your excuses look even more pathetic.

[djokovic2008]

Originally Posted by zagor

For the last time, he's not a Novak fan.

Oh zagor don't you owe me an apology, as I predicted djoker to win AO 13 and you were in doubt and told me to wait and see remember ?

[kishnabe]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Lol stop whining about six years it's pathetic and know one buys it, how insecure with the slam count lol.

When Djokovic is 30....I doubt he would be in the top 100....so stop crying that your boy isn't a versatile efficient player. Pretty pathetic that Djokovic, Murray and Nadal struggle with a 30+ year old......tennis era is getting weaker.

Djokovic is just a transition era.....

[zagor]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Oh zagor don't you owe me an apology, as I predicted djoker to win AO 13 and you were in doubt and told me to wait and see remember ?

Eh? What on earth are you talking about? I always maintained that Novak is the 1st favourite for AO with Murray being a close second.

[zagor]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Looks like the bait attracted a few fish, I'm gonna love when Murray and djoker hit 31 and still in great condition making your excuses look even more pathetic.

No, not Murray or Novak but Rafa, you may have fooled others here but you don't fool me.

[zagor]

Originally Posted by kishnabe

When Djokovic is 30....I doubt he would be in the top 100....so stop crying that your boy isn't a versatile efficient player. Pretty pathetic that Djokovic, Murray and Nadal struggle with a 30+ year old......tennis era is getting weaker.

Djokovic is just a transition era.....

No, it's not pathetic, Fed also struggled (relatively speaking) with 34 and 35 year old Agassi.

Fed is not as good as he once was but he's still a very tough player to beat when playing well.

That said, I don't think Novak will age as well as Fed did.

[TMF]

posters having an alternative username is bad enough already, but being a fake fanbase is just as bad.

I wonder if MTF have the same problem at this magnitude.

[Gonzo_style]

Originally Posted by kishnabe

When Djokovic is 30....I doubt he would be in the top 100.....

you need to check your head

[kishnabe]

Originally Posted by zagor

No, it's not pathetic, Fed also struggled (relatively speaking) with 34 and 35 year old Agassi.

Fed is not as good as he once was but he's still a very tough player to beat when playing well.

That said, I don't think Novak will age as well as Fed did.

Agassi seemed like he was on peds....unbelieble stockness in his 30's, and was far more physically fit than his 20 year old counterpart. More mature as well.

Federer was better in his 20's......you can't say that about Agassi.

If Agassi was mentally mature, worked harder like in his 30's when he was 20.....he would own Sampras and everyone else.....would have whooped even prime Federer.

[tennis_pro]

Originally Posted by djokovic2008

Lol stop whining about six years it's pathetic and know one buys it, how insecure with the slam count lol.

We'll talk in 2019 if Djokovic doesn't retire by then of course.

[President]

Originally Posted by zagor

No, it's not pathetic, Fed also struggled (relatively speaking) with 34 and 35 year old Agassi.

Fed is not as good as he once was but he's still a very tough player to beat when playing well.

That said, I don't think Novak will age as well as Fed did.

It's possible that he will age better IMO just because of Federer's mono...Roger declined prematurely and was a lot worse at 26-28 IMO than he should have been and I think its due to that damn disease. It's quite possible Djokovic will be better (relatively speaking) at that age than Roger was even if he shouldn't be according to playing style.