|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: how many slams | |||
| less than 17 |
|
7 | 10.00% |
| 17 |
|
5 | 7.14% |
| 17-19 |
|
10 | 14.29% |
| 20-22 |
|
11 | 15.71% |
| 23-25 |
|
12 | 17.14% |
| 26+ |
|
25 | 35.71% |
| Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | ||||
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: India
Posts: 11,468
|
Quote:
Quote:
of course fed wouldn't win, but if playing decent, he could certainly make it much more competitive ... Quote:
3-1 in 5 best 5 AOs ... I'm sure a feverish nadal or nadal @ his 6th best AO or nadal at 29+ would love to play someone like a younger , fitter, better version of himself or djoker in absolute top form or murray in absolute top form, bwahaha oh wait, he couldn't even handle murray @ AO 2010 , when playing well .... not to forget getting absolutely demolished by tsonga in AO 2008, two and half years after he won his first slam ...getting demolished by gonzo in AO 2007 a year and half after he won his first slam ... your boy nadal is 4-5 vs top 10 opponents at the AO federer is 13-7 vs top 10 opponents oops ! Quote:
and given his injuries and style of play, nadal's not going to stay at a high level close to how fed is now ... desperation to having to retort to trying to incite me because you were getting owned big time ...
__________________
Becker,Edberg and Sampras would baggel him ( federer ) on fast indoor or grass more often than not. - the one and only kiki Last edited by abmk : 02-02-2013 at 06:44 PM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|