|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hotel CA
Posts: 4,181
|
Not sure if the Wilson pro staff classic 85 with the all black paint job is a prototype ?
Its pictured with the Edberg pro staff original paint job and an early chicago pro staff and the stock pro staff classic. Many other pictures in the same folder can be viewed. Anyone know the story or have seen those stealth rackets before ? http://s920.beta.photobucket.com/use...ml?sort=3&o=22 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 214
|
Very interesting frame. Very rare IMO. I don't recall ever seeing a retail version of this 85. Looks similar to the custom Graf Prostaff 85 and the Edberg Classic 85 (non SV version) that Equijet showed us in the past.
Perhaps Equijet can chime in? Do you have the specs on this frame? Looks to be 22 mm in width and 18 x 20 string pattern. Is it standard length (i.e., 27 inches)? Any idea the static weight? Nonetheless, unique frame you have there. Thanks for sharing with us. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hotel CA
Posts: 4,181
|
Quote:
Look forward to reading Equijet opinions ... This picture shows it over the retail classic: http://s920.beta.photobucket.com/use...ml?sort=3&o=13 This picture show the beam width comparisons: http://s920.beta.photobucket.com/use...ml?sort=3&o=17 Last edited by joe sch : 12-20-2012 at 06:14 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Switzerland, Zürich Area
Posts: 232
|
Quote:
__________________
"Why should I be unpleasant when I can just as well be nice?" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
Yes, I think Equijet might be able to provide some insight into the frame as he owns the Edberg Classic PS 6.1 85 and the Graf PS 7.0 85. I'm just speculating here but some specs look to be: -85 square inches head size -18 x 20 string pattern -22 mm beam width -27 inches length Love to get the measurements on your prototype when you get back. Enjoy your vacation! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hotel CA
Posts: 4,181
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hotel CA
Posts: 4,181
|
Quote:
http://s920.beta.photobucket.com/use...e-104.jpg.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
New User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 41
|
Interesting.... I may have seen those racquets some where in other forums but still interesting....
Quite sure it means most of pros back then loved the 85 size than 95 since it has more control.... I started to play tennis with ps 85 anyways and I thought the racquet was superb~!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 90
|
Hi
I have another type proto type pro staff, 88face, build for some top Wilson player. http://twitpic.com/b03afk Thanks nycoara |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 27
|
To add another paint scheme to the mix:
This is the opposite of Stefan Edberg's Pro Staff Original with the Pro Staff Classic paint scheme: ![]() It is a Pro Staff Classic with a paint scheme similar to that of the Pro Staff Original. ![]() As you can see, it has a classic beam, is 95sqin, and has a 16x18 string pattern. I have two of these, and the strung specs (of the other one) are: 341.5g, 30.0cm, 298kgcm2 ProStringing
__________________
ERSA Pro Tour Stringer & Master Racket Technician 4x Head Radical Tour 630 XL; 353.5g, 30.8cm, 351kg/cm² (unstrung) |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 518
|
376gr unstrung? Mercy!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|