|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great NW
Posts: 5,608
|
Yet another reason I prefer spontaneous poaches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
New User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 28
|
So, as I expected, we met the #2 seeds in the finals. We had a very definite game plan incorporating a lot of the advice on this thread. We changed up the pace with some hard shots hit right at the net person mixed in with lob returns and drop shot returns so we effectively neutralized the net person and the server couldn't groove on the first volley. We were able to consistently get into position to control the net, and once at the net, we seemed to have the opportunity to finish the point easily on high volleys. We were able to get a lot of return errors with lots of movement from the net player looking to cut off the easy crosscourt. High first serve percentages were key as we were broken several times on the service games that didn't happen. So my final post-game analysis: 1. Get the first serve in with good placement. 2. Server's partner helps out as much as possible with poaches. 3. Be patient to set up the point so both partners can be at the net. 4. Look for opportunities to close the net and finish the point. 5. Be effective with variety on the returns of serve. We pretty much dictated play so we did not have to resort to other formations than playing both at the net. But thank-you to everyone who contributed their ideas! |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The High Country of Colorado
Posts: 5,245
|
You left out a "detail" in your report. Did you win?
- KK
__________________
Join PUT-OFF: Players Unwilling To Overlook Foot Faults .. .. .. .. .. The MAN -- Monster At Net .. .. .. .. .. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
New User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 28
|
Yup! Final score: 6-2, 6-3. Oh yeah, one service game went to four deuces because the ad court player was loving her crosscourt return. So we switched to the Australian formation and she dumped the DTL return into the bottom of the net and I thought "Thanks KK!".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,132
|
Quote:
Congrats to Tennissiz! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The High Country of Colorado
Posts: 5,245
|
Quote:
Wa-hoo! Congratulations. (papa & dmastous seems like some sneaky opponents, with their fake signals and distractors.) I believe Dubs is even more psychological than Singles. This is part of the evidence. - KK
__________________
Join PUT-OFF: Players Unwilling To Overlook Foot Faults .. .. .. .. .. The MAN -- Monster At Net .. .. .. .. .. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 100
|
Quote:
I have read all advice here regarding your problems, and the one that is most sound is from FIVE-0. One thing I would like to ask is how much spin do you put in your serve? If you put some or lots of sidespin on the serve, I highly doubt your opponents can rip returns low and with lots of pace (as you have mentioned) as frequent as he/she would like to. Assuming you have spin in your serve and still have the problem, then you and your partner need to learn how to catch low and fast volley, especially catching low and fast approach shots for the server. Most people are not efficient at low-and-heavy-ball volleys b/c their volley strokes aren't to firm and compact (like a short punch) but either too swingy or wristy. |
|
|
|
|
| BigbangerNYC |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BigbangerNYC |
|
|
#48 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 624
|
When she was coming into net did you try the lob then or after she was at net? Lobbing a person whos moving into the net can be a good tactic since it is almost always a more difficult overhead because they have to change their direction from moving forward to backward instantly.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|